The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review
about
A manifesto for reproducible scienceMischievous responding in Internet Gaming Disorder researchOpen research practices: unintended consequences and suggestions for averting them. (Commentary on the Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative)Equivalence Tests: A Practical Primer for t Tests, Correlations, and Meta-AnalysesA Large-Scale Test of the Goldilocks Hypothesis.A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer reviewA Bayesian bird's eye view of 'Replications of important results in social psychology'.Increasing Transparency Through a Multiverse Analysis.A prospective study of the motivational and health dynamics of Internet Gaming Disorder.Inhibition in aging: What is preserved? What declines? A meta-analysis.A weak scientific basis for gaming disorder: Let us err on the side of caution.Striving for transparent and credible research: practical guidelines for behavioral ecologists.Open Science Is Liberating and Can Foster Creativity.Populating the Data Ark: An attempt to retrieve, preserve, and liberate data from the most highly-cited psychology and psychiatry articlesGlobal Data Quality Assessment and the Situated Nature of “Best” Research Practices in BiologyThe state of the art in peer reviewThe abortion and mental health controversy: A comprehensive literature review of common ground agreements, disagreements, actionable recommendations, and research opportunities
P2860
Q28341964-64B2BCAC-A685-4EAE-BD45-790B06A56E9AQ28595551-76D43D57-1FBC-4C37-A432-3106E1DD4DF0Q28603437-F941A474-394B-4D26-A7A7-16265FD88CEAQ30062773-13ECB9EB-D0FF-4638-B463-4EB349657EC0Q30490686-A24D899F-7E67-464C-BAE1-709823B2CD67Q33269085-FA5F87AE-989E-4C4E-A201-F2EB07D6A28AQ37655888-F6A874F3-4D45-489B-BC10-DC4ED05F7058Q39330765-7498EA6D-8E10-4658-8C13-C6DE99F585F8Q42287494-517D6B9A-AC71-4BBF-9FC3-CB827B689C09Q50091905-A9AFDFD0-8B52-4DAF-BE2B-CA22A4EDEA26Q52316323-25E7F7C7-BF97-4BC3-8746-6EA8318C5A26Q53417138-17D6FF4B-366E-481A-990C-FB9885863E92Q55715082-731C9E01-746D-4DAB-882E-B85034099107Q56395229-05D25076-6377-4CBC-85CB-6E280530EFA4Q57265176-EAEBDE34-BEDE-4818-A853-D487DFE7663BQ57554278-27D19B08-6023-489A-87F8-A7E1D310F719Q58599661-2E46EDBD-445B-486B-90B5-25A3235071E1
P2860
The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review
description
2016 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2016 թուականի Յունուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2016 թվականի հունվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2016年の論文
@ja
2016年論文
@yue
2016年論文
@zh-hant
2016年論文
@zh-hk
2016年論文
@zh-mo
2016年論文
@zh-tw
2016年论文
@wuu
name
The Peer Reviewers' Openness I ...... practices through peer review
@ast
The Peer Reviewers' Openness I ...... practices through peer review
@en
The Peer Reviewers' Openness I ...... practices through peer review
@en-gb
The Peer Reviewers' Openness I ...... practices through peer review
@nl
type
label
The Peer Reviewers' Openness I ...... practices through peer review
@ast
The Peer Reviewers' Openness I ...... practices through peer review
@en
The Peer Reviewers' Openness I ...... practices through peer review
@en-gb
The Peer Reviewers' Openness I ...... practices through peer review
@nl
prefLabel
The Peer Reviewers' Openness I ...... practices through peer review
@ast
The Peer Reviewers' Openness I ...... practices through peer review
@en
The Peer Reviewers' Openness I ...... practices through peer review
@en-gb
The Peer Reviewers' Openness I ...... practices through peer review
@nl
P2093
P2860
P50
P3181
P356
P1476
The Peer Reviewers' Openness I ...... practices through peer review
@en
P2093
Candice Coker Morey
Christine R Harris
Daniel P Newman
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Rink Hoekstra
Rolf A Zwaan
P2860
P304
P3181
P356
10.1098/RSOS.150547
P407
P50
P577
2016-01-13T00:00:00Z