Communicating accuracy of tests to general practitioners: a controlled study.
about
Rapid tests and urine sampling techniques for the diagnosis of urinary tract infection (UTI) in children under five years: a systematic review.Explaining computation of predictive values: 2 x 2 table versus frequency tree. A randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN74278823]How well do health professionals interpret diagnostic information? A systematic reviewSan Francisco Syncope Rule to predict short-term serious outcomes: a systematic reviewLow CD4 count plus coma predicts cryptococcal meningitis in TanzaniaA qualitative study into the difficulties experienced by healthcare decision makers when reading a Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy review.Individual patient data meta-analysis of diagnostic studies: opportunities and challenges.Predicting future weight status from measurements made in early childhood: a novel longitudinal approach applied to Millennium Cohort Study dataGraphical presentation of diagnostic information.Predictive value of the 4Ts scoring system for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Individual patient data meta-analysis of diagnostic and prognostic studies in obstetrics, gynaecology and reproductive medicineDiagnostic accuracy of IgG-specific versus polyspecific enzyme-linked immunoassays in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Pretest expectations strongly influence interpretation of abnormal laboratory results and further managementCombined use of PCR-based TCRG and TCRB clonality tests on paraffin-embedded skin tissue in the differential diagnosis of mycosis fungoides and inflammatory dermatoses.Simple presentation of test accuracy may lead to inflated disease probabilities.Does prevalence matter to physicians in estimating post-test probability of disease? A randomized trialRed flags to screen for malignancy and fracture in patients with low back pain: systematic reviewHealth professionals' and service users' interpretation of screening test results: experimental studyValidity of footprint analysis to determine flatfoot using clinical diagnosis as the gold standard in a random sample aged 40 years and older.About time: diagnostic guidelines that help clinicians.Presentation of Diagnostic Information to Doctors May Change Their Interpretation and Clinical Management: A Web-Based Randomised Controlled Trial.Cautionary tales in the clinical interpretation of studies of diagnostic tests.Sensitivity, specificity, receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves and likelihood ratios: communicating the performance of diagnostic testsSystematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.Gut feelings as a third track in general practitioners' diagnostic reasoning.Does rectal examination have any value in the clinical diagnosis of cauda equina syndrome?Bayesian clinical reasoning: does intuitive estimation of likelihood ratios on an ordinal scale outperform estimation of sensitivities and specificities?Evaluating the impact of an evidence-based medicine educational intervention on primary care doctors' attitudes, knowledge and clinical behaviour: a controlled trial and before and after study.Health practitioners' perceptions of adopting clinical prediction rules in the management of musculoskeletal pain: a qualitative study in Australia.Temporal artery biopsy in giant cell arteritis--reply.Evidence-based medicine in otolaryngology, Part 3: everyday probabilities: diagnostic tests with binary results.Variation in the use of H. pylori tests in UK general practice--a qualitative study.Does exposure to simulated patient cases improve accuracy of clinicians' predictive value estimates of diagnostic test results? A within-subjects experiment at St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.Defining optimal cutoff value of MGMT promoter methylation by ROC analysis for clinical setting in glioblastoma patients.Bayesian reasoning in residents' preliminary diagnoses.
P2860
Q24791566-2E721A51-444F-4FC2-92C5-ECB7CEC5E5B9Q24802065-E2A447B3-2CA8-4D08-A054-B5C1D44B8314Q26798239-85593891-E9F3-414F-85AE-5DF57BF37290Q26827738-08D1D53D-E698-40A4-9871-B9582DA62766Q30444984-CBF9F8FA-B8EB-40AD-B232-878ECC065208Q30540060-6A99827A-E5EF-4386-A8FB-4E190A11D325Q30632404-A5CAE950-5325-4EB4-B6D4-83F11C382505Q31053932-5564F309-0FA8-4F29-883B-04C2738E336EQ33327750-0CF0021D-F954-485D-84A9-48F646AE2093Q33403395-04BFBC74-D6F3-41D3-8EB2-881549A9F170Q33423248-26706108-8BE8-4D4F-A07E-157C9C8D748EQ33440663-81D7FCD4-6341-4DC2-8E95-0277358BF424Q33531550-DC8CFCA7-C1CD-4A22-8F79-2A8341F2AEE6Q33813857-F18B4E21-7713-43E0-BBAC-DDEE8605AC0CQ33813902-01A48BDD-6265-42A6-821C-B6881E704FA7Q34148296-2FAD95ED-F23E-428B-9B1A-CDCAFB9B669BQ34391662-4B24D8A4-69B0-4667-8A3B-23141B43424FQ34900401-48ABCFFB-7CBC-42BC-86B1-35DED7E32587Q35028190-1D6435C1-8EBD-4CCC-803A-FD9ECD6E299EQ35526063-89437980-F529-4E3D-8A65-BA7613B064CCQ35823042-D1684BF6-32DE-4440-9CD4-AEE34CA69A9AQ36889069-AE9CF528-1ED3-4EF1-8264-B09B7616DA1CQ36915798-F681A475-62A7-4943-B3C8-515F7FC6E556Q37346962-6ADC3EB2-2A5A-45AD-9818-CAF21943D578Q37802259-5D039579-82B6-4F3D-A5CF-F51A1C1BDC5BQ38056774-A7410445-0044-46B3-81B6-9E06B7556051Q39267649-1A983AEE-981F-4B32-AC26-AD7A848042C8Q39807752-A459FCA7-7323-4D87-AC2B-E3B23A55B028Q42172340-FD733FA5-FBDD-401D-A8EC-CE1EE9DF9D6DQ42429055-BF920A27-BAB1-40EF-883F-158124054F9AQ43844098-A5E4EB45-C7C6-4C50-BB18-92D018969134Q46539040-B67A628B-30FC-427A-AF50-E498A6E11EA4Q50335964-5BA19F95-E327-4DBC-8AE8-A20976398D93Q53739720-35304C6A-3FB1-497B-98BB-73F25C8C485BQ54909022-8719501E-79DD-4241-856F-DDF3A067C019
P2860
Communicating accuracy of tests to general practitioners: a controlled study.
description
2002 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2002 թուականի Ապրիլին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2002 թվականի ապրիլին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2002年の論文
@ja
2002年論文
@yue
2002年論文
@zh-hant
2002年論文
@zh-hk
2002年論文
@zh-mo
2002年論文
@zh-tw
2002年论文
@wuu
name
Communicating accuracy of tests to general practitioners: a controlled study
@nl
Communicating accuracy of tests to general practitioners: a controlled study.
@ast
Communicating accuracy of tests to general practitioners: a controlled study.
@en
Communicating accuracy of tests to general practitioners: a controlled study.
@en-gb
type
label
Communicating accuracy of tests to general practitioners: a controlled study
@nl
Communicating accuracy of tests to general practitioners: a controlled study.
@ast
Communicating accuracy of tests to general practitioners: a controlled study.
@en
Communicating accuracy of tests to general practitioners: a controlled study.
@en-gb
prefLabel
Communicating accuracy of tests to general practitioners: a controlled study
@nl
Communicating accuracy of tests to general practitioners: a controlled study.
@ast
Communicating accuracy of tests to general practitioners: a controlled study.
@en
Communicating accuracy of tests to general practitioners: a controlled study.
@en-gb
P2093
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
Communicating accuracy of tests to general practitioners: a controlled study.
@en
P2093
Joachim E Fischer
Johann Steurer
Lucas M Bachmann
Michael Koller
P2860
P304
P356
10.1136/BMJ.324.7341.824
P407
P577
2002-04-01T00:00:00Z