Evidence for the selective reporting of analyses and discrepancies in clinical trials: a systematic review of cohort studies of clinical trials
about
A living document: reincarnating the research articleBias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventionsStatistical and methodological considerations for reporting RCTs in medical literaturePublished and unpublished evidence in coverage decision-making for pharmaceuticals in Europe: existing approaches and way forward.The quality of reporting methods and results of cost-effectiveness analyses in Spain: a methodological systematic reviewAgreements and Discrepancies between FDA Reports and Journal Papers on Biologic Agents Approved for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Meta-Research ProjectClinical research data sharing: what an open science world means for researchers involved in evidence synthesisCore outcome sets for research and clinical practice.Responsible Translation of Stem Cell Research: An Assessment of Clinical Trial Registration and Publications.Evidence of selective reporting bias in hematology journals: A systematic review.A systematic review of the processes used to link clinical trial registrations to their published resultsPublication bias in meta-analyses from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.Observational studies: getting clear about transparency.Is the evaluation of risk of bias in periodontology and implant dentistry comprehensive? A systematic review.Evidence-informed recommendations to reduce dissemination bias in clinical research: conclusions from the OPEN (Overcome failure to Publish nEgative fiNdings) project based on an international consensus meetingCore outcome sets and trial registries.Discrepancies in Outcome Reporting Exist Between Protocols and Published Oral Health Cochrane Systematic Reviews.Occurrence and determinants of selective reporting of clinical drug trials: design of an inception cohort studyExtent, Awareness and Perception of Dissemination Bias in Qualitative Research: An Explorative Survey.Rethinking the assessment of risk of bias due to selective reporting: a cross-sectional study.Effectiveness of Helicobacter pylori eradication in the prevention of primary gastric cancer in healthy asymptomatic people: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing risk ratio with risk differenceBiomedical text mining for research rigor and integrity: tasks, challenges, directions.Introduction to systematic reviews and meta-analysis.Investigation of bias in meta-analyses due to selective inclusion of trial effect estimates: empirical study.Outcomes in Cochrane systematic reviews related to wound care: An investigation into prespecification.State of reporting of primary biomedical research: a scoping review protocol.Protocol registration and selective outcome reporting in recent psychiatry trials: new antidepressants and cognitive behavioural therapies.Clinical trials: subgroup analyses in randomized trials--more rigour needed.Multivariate and network meta-analysis of multiple outcomes and multiple treatments: rationale, concepts, and examples.Outcome switching in randomized controlled oncology trials reporting on surrogate endpoints: a cross-sectional analysis.Why clinical trial outcomes fail to translate into benefits for patients.A protocol of a cross-sectional study evaluating an online tool for early career peer reviewers assessing reports of randomised controlled trialsIncreasing the evidence base in journalology: creating an international best practice journal research network.Linked publications from a single trial: a thread of evidence.Contacting of authors by systematic reviewers: protocol for a cross-sectional study and a survey.Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 7: understanding the potential impacts of dissemination bias.Promoting public access to clinical trial protocols: challenges and recommendations.Benefits, harms and evidence - reflections from UK primary healthcare.A systematic review of comparisons between protocols or registrations and full reports in primary biomedical research.Announcing changes to randomized controlled trial (RCT) registration requirements and our new Short Report format.
P2860
Q21128660-DDE008F4-6605-4CE2-B6EB-DEE87B764BDEQ24193207-A3C4E506-56C1-4B02-BECD-B0CED2800407Q26864374-C33E766F-86EE-4E5B-92AA-E4A4F9CEA8FEQ27303825-061108FB-DBFD-4F48-8C99-B4808CD02C42Q28073282-E8F0D409-2119-4125-A64E-12D5FC44E304Q28552773-E509AB53-8642-43E2-ABA6-EFBB7E5C5F47Q28595531-8079E97B-82B5-468E-B99F-A3315F79E479Q30234594-75A4F196-F431-4ED0-A395-8A7ED99F13A9Q33659105-960A2949-F4F6-45FC-8D82-0F291924F340Q33751652-6959BDF5-0EFD-42ED-8D7A-F76552EBE860Q33864361-3E850F37-2B3A-4CB4-A71B-3F4C798240A4Q34476958-4618807C-C992-464C-9067-7C2224ADCDF2Q35232105-2BDC5547-6E34-4CC1-A8B8-98C467452996Q35586847-6E06D15C-B198-475E-AD6C-BEFF032E4B9AQ35604866-73474CB7-DC47-4F89-9364-836440DCCC96Q35658444-4D5C9AB7-C89B-479D-A191-F4716C3EBA92Q35774634-D519D775-BBBC-4DCE-A431-A3810847BD70Q35844255-CF669965-304F-4431-AE01-F49B501DA29BQ36093869-B415105E-20B4-4918-B350-53F846279529Q37080259-2CFA3B22-364F-44AE-9743-4B6B87E2D123Q38619893-08F12C30-F494-4C99-A5CD-1441C973953BQ38668893-252D5BFC-5D82-4421-8E6E-580ED73E8C71Q38813449-2AB7F44C-7230-4F90-AFE6-2D9F0DA6D54AQ38819296-253D39DE-D793-47DA-968C-8708A98F84A3Q38859085-5846ED8D-C99D-4736-881F-54DACDE4A070Q39209608-60C7FED6-7834-4E88-9030-F1A9D4830B8AQ40542349-C2625106-7554-41BA-8AD9-240CF77BE6CFQ40691528-74670ADF-D857-4DF5-94CE-0A3D2E6E632CQ41176592-5676276D-BDC9-4A97-9094-E862C4E55D9BQ41503758-7F61C481-41DC-461A-91C3-2F44517F9265Q42316662-60668E84-A42F-4DD7-B911-7D95E41C7AF5Q42376867-A4325EE3-4692-42EA-AB51-53FD916EAE90Q42385678-D6BD10F5-949E-4D4C-858A-DB6571C9D03BQ42914106-C0F2A518-A6A9-4683-9234-6DCE9773C000Q47094614-0252BF75-DFE6-44BC-ACAB-316B4CBA8A4EQ47551337-A70AF56C-984C-4536-B29E-747E1228601CQ49900242-2352C2ED-926E-4045-915F-261C940FA371Q49956327-314DC7A7-840C-421F-AD3E-59611476E75DQ50081852-4E641DC8-2619-4F73-96CC-F4AF76F87456Q52309042-D4D1E029-9D7B-4BD7-BAB2-BB38D14A7DC0
P2860
Evidence for the selective reporting of analyses and discrepancies in clinical trials: a systematic review of cohort studies of clinical trials
description
2014 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2014 թուականի Յունիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2014 թվականի հունիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2014年の論文
@ja
2014年論文
@yue
2014年論文
@zh-hant
2014年論文
@zh-hk
2014年論文
@zh-mo
2014年論文
@zh-tw
2014年论文
@wuu
name
Evidence for the selective rep ...... ort studies of clinical trials
@ast
Evidence for the selective rep ...... ort studies of clinical trials
@en
Evidence for the selective rep ...... ort studies of clinical trials
@nl
type
label
Evidence for the selective rep ...... ort studies of clinical trials
@ast
Evidence for the selective rep ...... ort studies of clinical trials
@en
Evidence for the selective rep ...... ort studies of clinical trials
@nl
prefLabel
Evidence for the selective rep ...... ort studies of clinical trials
@ast
Evidence for the selective rep ...... ort studies of clinical trials
@en
Evidence for the selective rep ...... ort studies of clinical trials
@nl
P2093
P2860
P31
P50
P3181
P1433
P1476
Evidence for the selective rep ...... ort studies of clinical trials
@en
P2093
Jamie J. Kirkham
Jonathan A. C. Sterne
Kerry Dwan
Mike Clarke
P2860
P304
P3181
P356
10.1371/JOURNAL.PMED.1001666
P407
P577
2014-06-01T00:00:00Z