The validity of peer review in a general medicine journal
about
The validation of peer review through research impact measures and the implications for funding strategiesA prospective study on an innovative online forum for peer reviewing of surgical scienceThe evolution of academic performance in nine subspecialties of internal medicine: an analysis of journal citation reports from 1998 to 2010.Potential conflicts of interest of editorial board members from five leading spine journalsGrant Peer Review: Improving Inter-Rater Reliability with Training.The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors.Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials published in the Journal of Korean Medical Science from 1986 to 2011.Assessing the quality of randomized controlled urological trials conducted by korean medical institutions.A Quality Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials about Erectile Dysfunction.Looking Across and Looking Beyond the Knowledge Frontier: Intellectual Distance, Novelty, and Resource Allocation in Science.A critical evaluation of the volume, relevance and quality of evidence submitted by the tobacco industry to oppose standardised packaging of tobacco products.Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journalsThe European Heart Journal on the move: can scientific publishing be further improved?Validity and reliability of the scientific review process in nursing journals - time for a rethink?Reliability of reviewer ratings in the manuscript peer review process: an opportunity for improvement.Analysis of randomized controlled trials in Rheumatology International from 1981 to 2012: methodological assessment.Evaluation of an internal review process for grants and manuscripts in the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group.Rumors of the Demise of Peer Review are Premature.Quality analysis of randomized controlled trials in the International Journal of Impotence Research: quality assessment and relevant clinical impact.On the Nature and Role of Peer Review in Mathematics.Upgrading instructions for authors of scholarly journals.Testing the rebound peer review concept.Being an editor: Process, predicaments, and privilege.Peer review in scholarly biomedical journals: a few things that make a big difference.Capsule Commentary on Egloff et al., Publication Rates of Abstracts Presented at the Society of General Internal Medicine Annual Meeting.Peer Review of Abstracts Submitted to An Internal Medicine National Meeting: Is It a Predictor of Future Publication?
P2860
Q24288679-44A0170B-E4C1-4CA6-A152-120FB8BCE984Q33852921-51F98537-2EA0-421C-A2B8-53E1EB4CE7BFQ34464928-A8361A27-D256-40EF-8E57-3265C88869C3Q35652410-ECC800F0-1FF9-4274-BA2D-F1F14CD54217Q35663833-4AEEE3D1-FDFC-40FE-A586-23F2F77869A3Q35682383-A6808E08-76BA-4BB7-B49A-0BE6262309BFQ36195730-94336ECE-DC40-42A0-8820-EFBE464ADC14Q36859804-64B0FF54-08FA-4E44-8512-FCDD22459A17Q37165036-532DECCE-2E3B-4EE5-ADD6-19E54C2F6121Q37335818-5594D260-94C8-4545-B319-C2FCE2103C82Q37591068-14EE2B3E-FE72-442F-B406-14EBC7687475Q38036603-9F33EEA5-256A-404E-80BF-041BF50FF120Q38058275-5A3C5748-640C-4223-94E7-1284FD223674Q38100202-8B92679B-2ED9-4343-9D61-1BCC7B6562EDQ38117386-37F71352-F750-4540-BD2F-A9662DD443ACQ38190906-A3DF7B84-EAB5-4187-B9C5-BEFABA1E28CDQ38202963-F9FCC2A9-F88F-4038-9C9F-6937DCF2ADA6Q38592979-AD24442B-6C66-4450-96A7-B0A0989D8017Q39025069-36DBE57A-0A86-4305-B500-0F46CE63F58EQ39061153-117CED9A-46E6-4E2B-B4A6-0ACAC99173F7Q40432484-28BEA85E-77AA-4215-98A7-B0EF5FEFD3CEQ42549305-6E438ACE-7D9D-433B-81A5-AC5280F770DBQ42656676-44683EC1-207A-4BB8-A37D-306FC3618199Q43089710-016ED001-2B3A-4F21-AF2F-65BC646D3AA0Q51338978-E07CB0E7-9EB2-457B-AF32-CD93DD6FF418Q54381545-3D1EE405-2AFC-40E3-ABC9-A89B9EE1957C
P2860
The validity of peer review in a general medicine journal
description
2011 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2011 թուականին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2011 թվականին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2011年の論文
@ja
2011年論文
@yue
2011年論文
@zh-hant
2011年論文
@zh-hk
2011年論文
@zh-mo
2011年論文
@zh-tw
2011年论文
@wuu
name
The validity of peer review in a general medicine journal
@ast
The validity of peer review in a general medicine journal
@en
The validity of peer review in a general medicine journal
@nl
type
label
The validity of peer review in a general medicine journal
@ast
The validity of peer review in a general medicine journal
@en
The validity of peer review in a general medicine journal
@nl
prefLabel
The validity of peer review in a general medicine journal
@ast
The validity of peer review in a general medicine journal
@en
The validity of peer review in a general medicine journal
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1433
P1476
The validity of peer review in a general medicine journal
@en
P2093
Joanna Rea
Kathlyn E Fletcher
Malathi Srinivasan
P2860
P304
P356
10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0022475
P407
P577
2011-07-25T00:00:00Z