Adequacy of authors' replies to criticism raised in electronic letters to the editor: cohort study
about
sameAs
Decoupling the scholarly journalDesigning next-generation platforms for evaluating scientific output: what scientists can learn from the social webLetters to the editor in response to studies of guns in the home and homicide and suicide.What do letters to the editor publish about randomized controlled trials? A cross-sectional study.Standards in the face of uncertainty--peer review is flawed and under-researched, but the best we have.Five years of Trials.
P2860
Adequacy of authors' replies to criticism raised in electronic letters to the editor: cohort study
description
2010 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2010 թուականի Օգոստոսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2010 թվականի օգոստոսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2010年の論文
@ja
2010年論文
@yue
2010年論文
@zh-hant
2010年論文
@zh-hk
2010年論文
@zh-mo
2010年論文
@zh-tw
2010年论文
@wuu
name
Adequacy of authors' replies t ...... rs to the editor: cohort study
@ast
Adequacy of authors' replies t ...... rs to the editor: cohort study
@en
Adequacy of authors' replies t ...... rs to the editor: cohort study
@nl
type
label
Adequacy of authors' replies t ...... rs to the editor: cohort study
@ast
Adequacy of authors' replies t ...... rs to the editor: cohort study
@en
Adequacy of authors' replies t ...... rs to the editor: cohort study
@nl
prefLabel
Adequacy of authors' replies t ...... rs to the editor: cohort study
@ast
Adequacy of authors' replies t ...... rs to the editor: cohort study
@en
Adequacy of authors' replies t ...... rs to the editor: cohort study
@nl
P2860
P50
P356
P1433
P1476
Adequacy of authors' replies t ...... rs to the editor: cohort study
@en
P2093
Tony Delamothe
P2860
P356
10.1136/BMJ.C3926
P407
P577
2010-08-10T00:00:00Z