Comparison of percent density from raw and processed full-field digital mammography data.
about
Risk determination and prevention of breast cancerVision 20/20: Mammographic breast density and its clinical applicationsBreast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) breast composition descriptors: automated measurement development for full field digital mammographyPre-natal exposures and breast tissue composition: findings from a British pre-birth cohort of young women and a systematic review.Changes in mammographic density over time in breast cancer cases and women at high risk for breast cancer.Automated Percentage of Breast Density Measurements for Full-field Digital Mammography Applications.Area and volumetric density estimation in processed full-field digital mammograms for risk assessment of breast cancer.Background parenchymal uptake during molecular breast imaging and associated clinical factors.Consistency of visual assessments of mammographic breast density from vendor-specific "for presentation" imagesCase-control study of mammographic density and breast cancer risk using processed digital mammograms.Validation of DM-Scan, a computer-assisted tool to assess mammographic density in full-field digital mammograms.Impact of type of full-field digital image on mammographic density assessment and breast cancer risk estimation: a case-control study.Estimation of percentage breast tissue density: comparison between digital mammography (2D full field digital mammography) and digital breast tomosynthesis according to different BI-RADS categories.Equol-producing status, isoflavone intake, and breast density in a sample of U.S. Chinese women.Mammographic density assessed on paired raw and processed digital images and on paired screen-film and digital images across three mammography systems.Age at Menarche and Late Adolescent Adiposity Associated with Mammographic Density on Processed Digital Mammograms in 24,840 Women.The Impact of Acquisition Dose on Quantitative Breast Density Estimation with Digital Mammography: Results from ACRIN PA 4006.Breast parenchymal patterns in processed versus raw digital mammograms: A large population study toward assessing differences in quantitative measures across image representations.Quantitative comparison of clustered microcalcifications in for-presentation and for-processing mammograms in full-field digital mammography.Association of PALB2 sequence variants with the risk of early-onset breast cancer in patients from Turkey.International Consortium on Mammographic Density: Methodology and population diversity captured across 22 countries.
P2860
Q26991921-F4C22569-FFD7-4AD6-8EBE-ADE7660FCA5FQ28081408-BD9F3261-C55B-483F-98AE-27D94844EA4BQ30711555-FA9354AC-F6CD-48DA-8D27-6AAD701A37ECQ31136108-286AD33D-592E-4AF4-A2A3-4A0E3AEA67EDQ33934073-E2584D6A-3DF7-4D8A-8EFA-A21520C9E55EQ34199209-B92CE4D6-4DE5-484B-92D4-BC95B2105522Q34374548-727D2A1D-5DD0-4D01-B035-B03EB87DC1ECQ35580614-F1955DE8-977A-4FAC-B33E-39E3727714E9Q36564790-1AC87B45-61E0-4954-84DD-4875401515F2Q36923320-ABFC1863-9DC9-4A3A-A466-464C032F9F85Q36956749-F77F02C8-E365-46DD-9473-3566CC548EE6Q37286691-38E81A28-AD21-403E-9C12-B0DE5490C137Q37314904-D005409C-CA17-4C1C-A746-18FBB15E627EQ37324699-1C02D3F8-F6EC-4F26-92BF-21E5F0E33046Q37517477-282405C4-C4EA-4F9B-9A03-977BBD519E4EQ38683508-058DA610-5056-4216-B962-4E82033A98E4Q38784574-453DFC67-0197-47E3-80E8-23C9D183BB55Q38799941-9CC9FD5E-C185-4E56-A38A-680CC6C4D242Q40467031-2C4B5643-E565-44E0-AE7E-8226CFCDFAE0Q51543949-ED3AC267-FAD7-43C9-A059-88ED99349BAAQ51579135-7A71DC8A-161D-4782-AC7D-39D0547212CC
P2860
Comparison of percent density from raw and processed full-field digital mammography data.
description
2013 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2013 թուականի Յունուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2013 թվականի հունվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2013年の論文
@ja
2013年論文
@yue
2013年論文
@zh-hant
2013年論文
@zh-hk
2013年論文
@zh-mo
2013年論文
@zh-tw
2013年论文
@wuu
name
Comparison of percent density from raw and processed full-field digital mammography data.
@ast
Comparison of percent density from raw and processed full-field digital mammography data.
@en
type
label
Comparison of percent density from raw and processed full-field digital mammography data.
@ast
Comparison of percent density from raw and processed full-field digital mammography data.
@en
prefLabel
Comparison of percent density from raw and processed full-field digital mammography data.
@ast
Comparison of percent density from raw and processed full-field digital mammography data.
@en
P2093
P2860
P356
P1476
Comparison of percent density from raw and processed full-field digital mammography data.
@en
P2093
Christopher G Scott
Erin Ee Fowler
Gail Tiffenberg
John J Heine
Thomas A Sellers
V Shane Pankratz
P2860
P2888
P356
10.1186/BCR3372
P577
2013-01-04T00:00:00Z
P5875
P6179
1014511017