Protocol for the Locomotor Experience Applied Post-stroke (LEAPS) trial: a randomized controlled trial.
about
Meaningful gait speed improvement during the first 60 days poststroke: minimal clinically important difference.Reliability and validity of bilateral ankle accelerometer algorithms for activity recognition and walking speed after strokeThe promise of mHealth: daily activity monitoring and outcome assessments by wearable sensors.Advancing measurement of locomotor rehabilitation outcomes to optimize interventions and differentiate between recovery versus compensation.Combining d-cycloserine with motor training does not result in improved general motor learning in neurologically intact people or in people with stroke.International randomized clinical trial, stroke inpatient rehabilitation with reinforcement of walking speed (SIRROWS), improves outcomes.Should body weight-supported treadmill training and robotic-assistive steppers for locomotor training trot back to the starting gate?Progressive Staging of Pilot Studies to Improve Phase III Trials for Motor Interventions.Varied overground walking-task practice versus body-weight-supported treadmill training in ambulatory adults within one year of stroke: a randomized controlled trial protocolForward propulsion asymmetry is indicative of changes in plantarflexor coordination during walking in individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis.Harnessing neuroplasticity for clinical applications.Body-weight-supported treadmill rehabilitation after strokeLikelihood of myocardial infarction during stroke rehabilitation preceded by cardiovascular screening and an exercise tolerance test: the Locomotor Experience Applied Post-Stroke (LEAPS) trial.Body weight-supported treadmill training is no better than overground training for individuals with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial.Role of Robotics in Neurorehabilitation.Clinical effect size of an educational intervention in the home and compliance with mobile phone-based reminders for people who suffer from stroke: protocol of a randomized controlled trial.Wearable systems for monitoring mobility-related activities in chronic disease: a systematic reviewCharacterizing and identifying risk for falls in the LEAPS study: a randomized clinical trial of interventions to improve walking poststroke.Singapore Tele-technology Aided Rehabilitation in Stroke (STARS) trial: protocol of a randomized clinical trial on tele-rehabilitation for stroke patientsUse of visual and proprioceptive feedback to improve gait speed and spatiotemporal symmetry following chronic stroke: a case seriesIndividuals Poststroke Do Not Perceive Their Spatiotemporal Gait Asymmetries as Abnormal.A prospective test of the late effects of potentially antineuroplastic drugs in a stroke rehabilitation study.Mechanisms used to increase peak propulsive force following 12-weeks of gait training in individuals poststroke.Dynamic primitives in the control of locomotion.Validation of a speed-based classification system using quantitative measures of walking performance poststroke.Concordance and discordance between measured and perceived balance and the effect on gait speed and falls following strokeTechnology-assisted stroke rehabilitation in Mexico: a pilot randomized trial comparing traditional therapy to circuit training in a Robot/technology-assisted therapy gym.High-Intensity Interval Training and Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training in Ambulatory Chronic Stroke: Feasibility StudyVisual cue training to improve walking and turning after stroke: a study protocol for a multi-centre, single blind randomised pilot trial.Functional restoration for the stroke survivor: informing the efforts of engineers.Adherence to accelerometry measurement of community ambulation poststroke.Hospital-based stroke rehabilitation in the United States.Motor rehabilitation after stroke, traumatic brain, and spinal cord injury: common denominators within recent clinical trialsImportance of specificity, amount, and intensity of locomotor training to improve ambulatory function in patients poststroke.Influence of lower extremity sensory function on locomotor adaptation following stroke: a review.High-intensity interval training in stroke rehabilitation.Harnessing the power of neuroplasticity for intervention.Being deliberate in postacute stroke: strategies to redeem the time.Robotic Therapy and the Paradox of the Diminishing Number of Degrees of Freedom.Altered Sagittal- and Frontal-Plane Kinematics Following High-Intensity Stepping Training Versus Conventional Interventions in Subacute Stroke.
P2860
Q30492981-77DC0639-6600-488E-BDAB-F89774F1DAD2Q30620986-18184DC7-B046-46B4-90CC-BD745E5DD118Q33438631-EA0618D6-0DC0-4CA2-A345-51530C689C49Q33664682-4A00C612-5536-4D4F-AC7D-D82FF02EC72CQ33708292-2989ADD9-FF77-440C-AFC2-95EAF8A4A912Q33904241-B191288C-49DF-4314-962E-9FE1D0600453Q33904248-89E7E19C-F482-4CB2-B8F3-463CD2CAFF1EQ33904274-E7110DB9-2438-4FD2-B019-63CB1F6B1777Q34054072-9F85BA09-02DD-4407-B188-BA2D1F0E5285Q34150420-88EFAF00-D002-44B7-948F-ECA3519428C8Q34177415-4031406C-51E9-4804-8D05-80ADD3F56508Q34187228-13711249-1188-470C-A58B-C6DAD5CFA0F2Q34490374-32A2A582-8AAB-4AA1-9539-3324A71025ACQ34632329-8834E17D-347A-4303-A906-96541FF9F58AQ35169560-86F5B047-E8DE-4E3C-8911-DDFEA966B75DQ35223037-81D79719-C213-4110-BD29-AA00511FE291Q35593458-4AD58BC1-B7B4-4AEA-B41E-45DBBBE039F0Q35693466-302E7A13-ACFC-43CD-9739-C4EEA543CF26Q35765053-F2E78F63-6D8C-49FD-A05E-00A51DAB201BQ35937163-9272D2F0-3D5E-4ED9-B2CC-A3341F2277FDQ36017853-F51643CB-5F63-4CAA-ADB0-08EE68CE6347Q36565961-44D8EDEE-8920-428F-9408-9D8987C5A761Q36601083-6CAA637D-67EE-49EA-8F78-C43541A36AF9Q36946088-4FAE00CD-20B2-424B-B719-758F96AAF16DQ36983448-1683460A-EFD1-4CFE-9428-F7C1209FE7B0Q37157632-497CB2AD-FB1C-434C-90AE-C7BB7523646EQ37260515-01E64BA9-18D9-484F-919F-7C7CA9E8B65BQ37303769-B67C969F-1F04-4204-A6AA-6314A3F599F3Q37355961-70AFDF2C-2C96-49C8-8888-077809BBF7F4Q37374008-6D6FFB9B-D5D5-4F3E-917B-2AC6DEB376F1Q37482126-154B9866-96D3-4E28-B31D-69D235605A57Q37482955-7812AC9F-46C8-48BE-9A00-68BB1FABE5F3Q37590641-938CDC04-2590-4110-8830-0816A47849D3Q37931532-65E959F1-E729-481B-9E52-30F2BC90F214Q38120591-7F2C78DD-F2A6-4D72-A21B-B5D01EBCEAD9Q38124819-55981216-A50F-4CF4-BE12-788FB67FCDEAQ38229013-2FA0C5A9-A143-471E-8E56-7CEC7BCAD66BQ38242558-8BC206FA-5FA4-4963-A94D-7799E5AD4854Q38621991-D8315E88-0003-4F5F-A29E-8FD005A5E8A8Q38799332-FB8FF16E-E5D4-4746-9854-C53D6C191FB1
P2860
Protocol for the Locomotor Experience Applied Post-stroke (LEAPS) trial: a randomized controlled trial.
description
2007 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2007 թուականի Նոյեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2007 թվականի նոյեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2007年の論文
@ja
2007年論文
@yue
2007年論文
@zh-hant
2007年論文
@zh-hk
2007年論文
@zh-mo
2007年論文
@zh-tw
2007年论文
@wuu
name
Protocol for the Locomotor Exp ...... a randomized controlled trial.
@ast
Protocol for the Locomotor Exp ...... a randomized controlled trial.
@en
type
label
Protocol for the Locomotor Exp ...... a randomized controlled trial.
@ast
Protocol for the Locomotor Exp ...... a randomized controlled trial.
@en
prefLabel
Protocol for the Locomotor Exp ...... a randomized controlled trial.
@ast
Protocol for the Locomotor Exp ...... a randomized controlled trial.
@en
P2093
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
Protocol for the Locomotor Exp ...... a randomized controlled trial.
@en
P2093
Andrea L Behrman
Bruce H Dobkin
Dorian K Rose
Julie K Tilson
Katherine J Sullivan
LEAPS Investigative Team
Pamela W Duncan
Samuel S Wu
Stanley P Azen
Stephen E Nadeau
P2860
P2888
P356
10.1186/1471-2377-7-39
P577
2007-11-08T00:00:00Z
P5875
P6179
1045915435