Standardized colonoscopy reporting and data system: report of the Quality Assurance Task Group of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable.
about
Fecal occult blood testing beliefs and practices of U.S. primary care physicians: serious deviations from evidence-based recommendationsA Review on the Quality of Colonoscopy ReportingReporting systems in gastrointestinal endoscopy: Requirements and standards facilitating quality improvement: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy position statementCancer screening in the United States, 2016: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screeningColonoscopy quality: metrics and implementationExpert opinions and scientific evidence for colonoscopy key performance indicatorsImportance of determining indication for colonoscopy: implications for practice and policy originalDeveloping a natural language processing application for measuring the quality of colonoscopy proceduresLow rate of large polyps (>9 mm) within 10 years after an adequate baseline colonoscopy with no polypsAssessment of the quality of colonoscopy reports: results from a multicenter consortiumEuropean guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis: overview and introduction to the full supplement publication.The Quality of Colonoscopy Reporting in Usual Practice: Are Endoscopists Reporting Key Data Elements?Screening colonoscopy and risk for incident late-stage colorectal cancer diagnosis in average-risk adults: a nested case-control studyQuality assurance as an integrated part of the electronic medical record - a prototype applied for colonoscopy.Anatomic classification of the endoscopic appearance of the normal appendiceal orifice: a novel tool for recognition and documentation of cecal intubation.Colonoscopy quality assurance in Ontario: Systematic review and clinical practice guidelineBoston Bowel Preparation Scale scores provide a standardized definition of adequate for describing bowel cleanliness.Highlights from the 50th seminar of the korean society of gastrointestinal endoscopy.The quality of colonoscopy services--responsibilities of referring clinicians: a consensus statement of the Quality Assurance Task Group, National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable.Quality assessment of colonoscopy reporting: results from a statewide cancer screening program.Improving quality in cancer screening: the excellence report for colonoscopy.Quality of colonoscopy reporting in community practice.Predictors of Poor Adherence of US Gastroenterologists with Colonoscopy Screening and Surveillance GuidelinesHigh resolution colonoscopy in a bowel cancer screening program improves polyp detection.What level of bowel prep quality requires early repeat colonoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of preparation quality on adenoma detection rate.Using segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series data to assess colonoscopy quality outcomes of a web-enhanced implementation toolkit to support evidence-based practices for bowel preparation: a study protocolAssessment of quality in screening colonoscopy for colorectal cancer.Assessing screening quality in the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration ProgramChoosing the optimal method in programmatic colorectal cancer screening: current evidence and controversies.The last frontier: innovative efforts to reduce colorectal cancer disparities among the remote Alaska Native population.Predictive cytogenetic biomarkers for colorectal neoplasia in medium risk patients.Quality audit of colonoscopy reports amongst patients screened or surveilled for colorectal neoplasia.Colometer: a real-time quality feedback system for screening colonoscopy.Significance of serrated polyps of the colon.Molecular stool testing as an alternative for surveillance colonoscopy: a cross-sectional cohort studyA prospective intervention study of colonoscopy reporting among patients screened or surveilled for colorectal neoplasia.Observational methods to assess the effectiveness of screening colonoscopy in reducing right colon cancer mortality risk: SCOLAR.Ongoing colorectal cancer risk despite surveillance colonoscopy: the Polyp Prevention Trial Continued Follow-up StudyImplementation of a program to improve the quality of colonoscopy increases the neoplasia detection rate: a prospective study.Segmental increases in force application during colonoscope insertion: quantitative analysis using force monitoring technology.
P2860
Q24620823-8B0B5B92-6A96-40C4-9C7B-36CED38B65C3Q26742096-59FD5A30-6D84-4B60-A4B4-9B04F330D256Q26752861-8B906831-96AD-45A5-9014-F06CBF5E89DCQ26770123-C758B7BB-F1BE-440E-964A-BEF76E8FEA25Q26865934-022BA275-CE87-46CF-9BC1-135B44806387Q28078507-C666C744-D104-4C81-8645-34D9A565D880Q28081988-56ED93E1-FF7C-4867-8964-37E2907572C9Q28394901-B2A2F273-8A3B-4D77-91D3-215B8C3D43DEQ28652812-B692B392-D540-4B65-9776-4B96F2D7836EQ28751392-7C6295E7-CE9F-4833-9164-4BF7DF0A5076Q30485842-A521E4BA-6586-4703-BE34-75C53B753807Q30489780-50CAB6F5-80A2-474A-BCF0-40ED9F0065D5Q30543607-57EF3BD5-C788-41F2-9E59-9B8FA77A6738Q33491058-32847015-6647-441C-B44D-7BFAAE77A13CQ33698982-B7CCDEEF-7279-435A-AF3E-EBA61A254C93Q33725609-9E887DAF-B056-48EE-9D2F-2D06F92286A7Q33922631-B51E423D-F117-48C2-8A9E-AAA41577740AQ34036891-534DA7DE-83FD-4186-8256-32B90C5C25F5Q34164221-D7B3CC64-21CF-4A5C-981C-BFAAC7A7FB49Q34169873-7F52FC2E-EBD3-414F-8225-8EC066C3F43BQ34583721-1A5CC092-EF01-446D-BDE8-AFD254FC9083Q34923030-D47198FC-F920-421A-A495-B50407D4C9FCQ35536970-6FEB0AAC-6091-4E70-820D-CDCB71A25A81Q35545733-C8B790CC-6B3B-43E3-8062-4A0A063E1984Q35580936-524B5965-13F7-4D3F-B180-7020A70A63A0Q35655491-A251A700-CFDE-467C-9C13-CA5C69458CECQ35662028-5407BCB1-4DAB-4B3E-BB03-D9F77D0711D0Q35775961-CEC56857-3E79-4348-92B6-499278AA48F0Q35780915-F08034D9-62E7-43E7-A206-748E88134924Q35910938-024C50D2-6030-4E67-8F1D-20FAA5A91C10Q36017736-69A974BF-A710-43AB-8DD4-5F15BF73FFD2Q36105537-8E68BAC2-1388-4DC3-809C-72B22F5817B9Q36215477-0E74198B-6F91-4B09-B10D-AA657CE6B3E9Q36221351-153F49FB-EFBF-4ECF-9F32-309CE3625221Q36273412-7CEC584F-D741-40B4-8CD2-1E82B8DB19AFQ36322295-CC1BB2FB-0AC3-4C6E-9F79-936C1D110947Q36338676-F4F01CF3-F204-4830-9147-10D3EDA132B5Q36408502-052976ED-E6EF-4E48-B47D-47A377EC462CQ36463411-A94AFDA3-2438-49C7-B17C-F2FB68C2F341Q36488696-0836FD07-C57D-4907-BF69-A8C8EB72D467
P2860
Standardized colonoscopy reporting and data system: report of the Quality Assurance Task Group of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable.
description
2007 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2007 թուականի Մայիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2007 թվականի մայիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2007年の論文
@ja
2007年論文
@yue
2007年論文
@zh-hant
2007年論文
@zh-hk
2007年論文
@zh-mo
2007年論文
@zh-tw
2007年论文
@wuu
name
Standardized colonoscopy repor ...... Colorectal Cancer Roundtable.
@ast
Standardized colonoscopy repor ...... Colorectal Cancer Roundtable.
@en
type
label
Standardized colonoscopy repor ...... Colorectal Cancer Roundtable.
@ast
Standardized colonoscopy repor ...... Colorectal Cancer Roundtable.
@en
prefLabel
Standardized colonoscopy repor ...... Colorectal Cancer Roundtable.
@ast
Standardized colonoscopy repor ...... Colorectal Cancer Roundtable.
@en
P2093
P50
P1476
Standardized colonoscopy repor ...... Colorectal Cancer Roundtable.
@en
P2093
C Daniel Johnson
David Lieberman
John B Pope
Marion Nadel
Robert A Smith
Robert Fletcher
Robert Schoen
Seth N Glick
Sidney Winawer
Subash B Duggirala
P304
P356
10.1016/J.GIE.2006.12.055
P407
P577
2007-05-01T00:00:00Z