Comparing methods of clinical measurement: reporting standards for bland and altman analysis.
about
Design, analysis, and interpretation of method-comparison studiesEvaluation of a new nonnvasive device in determining hemoglobin levels in emergency department patients.RETRACTED: Point-of-care (POC) testing of lactate in the intensive care patient. Accuracy, reliability, and costs of different measurement systems.Assessing glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury--true GFR versus urinary creatinine clearance and estimating equations.Psychometric properties of the Nurses Work Functioning Questionnaire (NWFQ).Study on accommodation by autorefraction and dynamic refraction in children.Determination of angiotensin I-converting enzyme activity in equine blood: lack of agreement between methods of analysisAccuracy of 3D dual echo steady state (DESS) MR arthrography to quantify acetabular cartilage thickness.A systematic review of observational pain assessment instruments for use with nonverbal intubated critically ill adult patients in the emergency department: an assessment of their suitability and psychometric properties.Application of Mixed Effects Limits of Agreement in the Presence of Multiple Sources of Variability: Exemplar from the Comparison of Several Devices to Measure Respiratory Rate in COPD Patients.Validation of A Point-of-Care Lactate Device For Screening At-Risk Adults Receiving Combination Antiretroviral Therapy In BotswanaResearcher bias and generalization of results in bias and limits of agreement analyses: a commentary based on the review of 50 Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica papers using the Altman-Bland approach.A Bland-Altman comparison of the Lead CareĀ® System and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry for detecting low-level lead in child whole blood samples.Ultrasound evaluation of the abductor hallucis muscle: Reliability studyRepeatability and reproducibility of the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp and the tracer dilution technique in a controlled inpatient setting.Reliability of measuring abductor hallucis muscle parameters using two different diagnostic ultrasound machines.Effects of cervical muscle fatigue on the perception of the subjective vertical and horizontal.Assessing agreement between two measurement systems: An alternative to the limits of agreement approach.Random Forest-Based Approach for Maximum Power Point Tracking of Photovoltaic Systems Operating under Actual Environmental Conditions.The UEA Small RNA Workbench: A Suite of Computational Tools for Small RNA Analysis.Comparison of the Performances of (18)F-FP-CIT Brain PET/MR and Simultaneous PET/CT: a Preliminary Study.The Broselow and Handtevy Resuscitation Tapes: A Comparison of the Performance of Pediatric Weight Prediction.Development and validation of prognostic models designed to predict wheelchair skills at discharge from spinal cord injury rehabilitation.A reliable and safe method of collecting blood samples from implantable central venous catheters for determination of plasma gentamicin concentrations.Application of bland-altman method in comparing transrectal and transabdominal ultrasonography for estimating prostate volume.Modelflow estimates of cardiac output compared with Doppler ultrasound during acute changes in vascular resistance in women.The nature and discriminatory value of urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin in critically ill patients at risk of acute kidney injury.Bedside estimation of absolute renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate in the intensive care unit. A validation of two independent methods.Determination of ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulfate from dried blood spots.Corneal thickness measurements with the Concerto on-board pachymeter.Improvements in the application and reporting of advanced Bland-Altman methods of comparison.Influence of catecholamines at different dosages on the function of the LiDCO sensor in isoflurane anesthetized horses.Agreement of tricuspid annular systolic excursion measurement between transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography in the perioperative setting.Comparison between cardiac output values measured by thermodilution and partial carbon dioxide rebreathing in patients with acute lung injury.Comparing heteroscedastic measurement systems with the probability of agreement.Measurement properties of the Work Limitations Questionnaire were sufficient among cancer survivors.Anthropometric estimation of femoral venous cannula length for cardiovascular surgery.Agreement between PiCCO pulse-contour analysis, pulmonal artery thermodilution and transthoracic thermodilution during off-pump coronary artery by-pass surgery.The quality of working life questionnaire for cancer survivors (QWLQ-CS): factorial structure, internal consistency, construct validity and reproducibility.Prevalence of systolic and diastolic dysfunction in patients with type 1 diabetes without known heart disease: the Thousand & 1 Study.
P2860
Q24601499-E63524C7-A809-4F6D-A53D-DDF672D5BFC4Q30454546-A4D0761E-4069-4162-9870-CB0CF965A8C7Q31890393-6EF2EA98-93F8-45A3-AA14-E17A30D37175Q33751000-80DC552A-4C4D-4AE4-947F-8034FA8424D5Q34075432-60226464-9D29-45EB-B9AC-6EC7D6FE6C25Q34424912-F1047099-046A-4239-9B6B-E8DCED508A26Q34648097-B428875B-8D0B-4D77-8192-529E9EFA8514Q36126980-DCD376C5-4CA7-4821-80D4-D3A554C05A77Q36148413-27CC2866-8562-4C9D-946C-586E06C2B949Q36223649-554A624A-3921-40DA-A889-48648C0EBEBBQ36329990-9AB28E06-BB50-4F74-B452-DFB706A14A0AQ36598989-BDEACCDD-3A33-43B3-9620-468CA35D0FA2Q36733993-B01B10E6-14DD-41EF-B037-596EF07532CBQ36932504-BB298EFD-F973-4EA9-9B4A-D58A1067CA0BQ37217176-CE53F540-8A18-452C-96A5-A31ED3D5C0CDQ37444607-CDC34FAD-FB7A-4FF8-B8F2-37813F99F4BBQ37614219-7A74D134-3DA2-47D8-9F1A-2A4D819FD799Q38579735-5768A9BA-107D-43BC-BACE-C18CF8FCF58AQ38681878-3B014855-4E15-484E-AD20-3E02069C822AQ38821609-A6713705-9C40-4A84-A5FD-91A5B2C53FE3Q38829876-001B7D15-30E7-423E-AB38-7F525B87572DQ39739082-C636E301-AA86-4118-8952-165EF1691D14Q39926712-C73F9210-D6DC-4792-9264-9018545FC924Q40311868-AA603E24-FCF3-4B4C-93DA-25C3E1450C67Q41482004-142196AA-4A63-4DDA-9325-9906448AB37FQ43191915-1BC7C76E-2FB4-4D27-A18B-69419D346153Q45038741-F1C84C28-7F6A-4F8C-9DFD-EC2762A5B3EFQ45064588-8672CD0E-7CD7-474B-B3C9-DD49C576A672Q45257755-FAD53B46-FB27-4DB0-BBC0-2D1A9B97719BQ46039456-D86E89B8-1DBC-4F6C-A5A9-C294EA43040AQ46882842-5C1E032C-D2D4-4DFD-8E1B-41E17E0931A6Q47235668-75A04BF0-7DD4-4D03-93F8-8E9D7CED1084Q47307184-67117693-EBDA-4157-9BA7-DDA44C74E778Q47854145-B351E3F9-E8D9-454F-9F9B-50BF11764211Q47856065-36F85B4F-ACB7-44F0-B384-AD770647F562Q48197981-1364983D-FFF6-4438-B8F5-8ECD4C5ECAB3Q48312303-751E3ACA-27EC-4E6D-98D6-9E7AD9676A6AQ48661949-D748734E-1208-49D4-B1D6-8981BBDB3B1AQ49229466-2920BB7A-6B23-4DF6-A5B4-BA45F723D96EQ51166889-CD65320D-8324-4960-81E1-8EED6B64F3E7
P2860
Comparing methods of clinical measurement: reporting standards for bland and altman analysis.
description
2000 nĆ® lÅ«n-bĆ»n
@nan
2000 Õ©ÕøÖÕ”ÕÆÕ”Õ¶Õ« ÕÕ”ÖÕæÕ«Õ¶ Õ°ÖÕ”ÕæÕ”ÖÕ”ÕÆÕøÖÕ”Õ® Õ£Õ«ÕæÕ”ÕÆÕ”Õ¶ ÕµÖ
Õ¤ÕøÖÕ”Õ®
@hyw
2000 Õ©Õ¾Õ”ÕÆÕ”Õ¶Õ« Õ“Õ”ÖÕæÕ«Õ¶ Õ°ÖÕ”ÕæÕ”ÖÕ”ÕÆÕ¾Õ”Õ® Õ£Õ«ÕæÕ”ÕÆÕ”Õ¶ Õ°ÕøÕ¤Õ¾Õ”Õ®
@hy
2000幓ć®č«ę
@ja
2000幓č«ę
@yue
2000幓č«ę
@zh-hant
2000幓č«ę
@zh-hk
2000幓č«ę
@zh-mo
2000幓č«ę
@zh-tw
2000幓č®ŗę
@wuu
name
Comparing methods of clinical ...... for bland and altman analysis.
@ast
Comparing methods of clinical ...... for bland and altman analysis.
@en
type
label
Comparing methods of clinical ...... for bland and altman analysis.
@ast
Comparing methods of clinical ...... for bland and altman analysis.
@en
prefLabel
Comparing methods of clinical ...... for bland and altman analysis.
@ast
Comparing methods of clinical ...... for bland and altman analysis.
@en
P2093
P1476
Comparing methods of clinical ...... for bland and altman analysis.
@en
P2093
P304
P356
10.1097/00000539-200003000-00018
P407
P577
2000-03-01T00:00:00Z