A randomised trial and economic evaluation of the effect of response mode on response rate, response bias, and item non-response in a survey of doctors.
about
The effectiveness of recruitment strategies on general practitioner's survey response rates - a systematic reviewConfounding factors in using upward feedback to assess the quality of medical training: a systematic review.Surveying End-of-Life Medical Decisions in France: Evaluation of an Innovative Mixed-Mode Data Collection StrategyStudy protocol of an equivalence randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of three different approaches to collecting Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) data using the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Registry-Victoria (PCOR-VIC)Publication practices and standards: recommendations from GSK Vaccines' author survey.Knowledge, attitudes and referral patterns of lynch syndrome: a survey of clinicians in australiaHow doctors view and use social media: a national survey.Adoption, use, and impact of e-booking in private medical practices: mixed-methods evaluation of a two-year showcase project in Canada.Perceptions of gender-based discrimination during surgical training and practice.Supplementing online surveys with a mailed option to reduce bias and improve response rate: the National Dental Practice-Based Research NetworkReview of sampling, sample and data collection procedures in nursing research--An example of research on ethical climate as perceived by nurses.Scientists' Prioritization of Communication Objectives for Public Engagement.Avoiding Treatment Interruptions: What Role Do Australian Community Pharmacists Play?Stressed and overworked? A cross-sectional study of the working situation of urban and rural general practitioners in Austria in the framework of the QUALICOPC projectThe practice of OTC counseling by community pharmacists in Parana, Brazil.Peer-to-Peer, Interactive GP Education can Reduce Barriers to Best Practice in Diabetes Management.Research priorities relating to the debate on assisted dying: what do we still need to know? Results of a modified Delphi technique.Web-based versus traditional paper questionnaires: a mixed-mode survey with a Nordic perspective.Surveying clinicians by web: current issues in design and administration.Norwegian reference values for the Short-Form Health Survey 36: development over time.Selecting, training and assessing new general practice community teachers in UK medical schools.A national follow-up survey of UK graduates opinion of undergraduate oral surgery teaching.Effectiveness of Depression-Suicidal Behaviour Gatekeeper Training among police officers in three European regions: Outcomes of the Optimising Suicide Prevention Programmes and Their Implementation in Europe (OSPI-Europe) study.Survey of international regional anesthesia fellowship directorsAdding Postal Follow-Up to a Web-Based Survey of Primary Care and Gastroenterology Clinic Physician Chiefs Improved Response Rates but not Response Quality or Representativeness.Enhancing surveys of health care professionals: a meta-analysis of techniques to improve response.Gastroenterology training in Australia: how much is enough?Comparing doctors' legal compliance across three Australian states for decisions whether to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining medical treatment: does different law lead to different decisions?Electronic Questionnaires Design and Implementation.Knowledge and Preferences of Primary Care Providers in Delivering Head and Neck Cancer Survivorship Care.Routine Use of Quantitative Disease Activity Measurements among US Rheumatologists: Implications for Treat-to-target Management Strategies in Rheumatoid Arthritis.Paper- or Web-Based Questionnaire Invitations as a Method for Data Collection: Cross-Sectional Comparative Study of Differences in Response Rate, Completeness of Data, and Financial Cost.Medical student views on the use of Facebook profile screening by residency admissions committees.Effects of pre-notification, invitation length, questionnaire length and reminder on participation rate: a quasi-randomised controlled trial.Oral cancer screening practices of oral health professionals in Australia.Assessment and management of alcohol-related admissions to UK intensive care units.Using Social Media to Generate and Collect Primary Data: The #ShowsWorkplaceCompassion Twitter Research Campaign.Opinions of nephrologists on the efficacy and tolerance of statins in hemodialysis patients.Use of annual surveying to identify technology trends and improve service provision.Ethical Quandaries and Facebook Use: How Do Medical Students Think They (and Their Peers) Should (and Would) Act?
P2860
Q27026398-8B2841CF-88FE-48FD-8C0D-791B79E39EC8Q30618983-52E1645B-DB58-4635-8549-9EECE8A61E7FQ31047718-59A7C244-89EA-4A60-BCC7-4E720ACCA49AQ31156221-96D9D4ED-E193-4757-9CD2-26BA957228BFQ34584753-86C354A8-D2F4-4B97-8ECA-D996DB42C539Q34683932-375D53B2-D4BE-4B68-B7DE-961ED69D8E6DQ34766675-211ED16F-AFF5-4DBE-BE7E-AE9059822286Q34882404-567696B9-B70A-478C-A44C-0FD9A35DDCCEQ35050388-DB08D7E6-5C83-4FAA-8B51-D680B2B43276Q35156262-EB07FA72-4932-415E-BFD9-D762A1846C8AQ35562513-DABB260E-B6C1-4911-9479-5E22A67B4DBAQ35935403-51EDE16E-B854-433F-AA0F-E47A084D4374Q36015275-772981CF-28A9-49F1-A37B-B2F9BE7A6B05Q36077961-2AE2AC49-EB22-4D23-8C11-9239074BA4F7Q36416636-39DB80F3-2A90-482D-BEB3-944860C759B9Q36712225-0BE00EFE-4D5A-4301-AE3E-0C0EE65482A8Q37007115-6F68BE90-32DB-4F0C-8AEB-3F547B928272Q37134192-6DCCBB8B-223B-4E7F-AFCD-93215A17A6E8Q38131468-87C214DD-0C0B-43A9-B8F2-9517050110F8Q38624644-0386F5B8-FC1E-4DF2-9506-C08F27BA05B4Q38711048-D5D9B580-2CF0-4153-82C6-F22F2D0972ABQ38990232-3FB2EF42-EE5C-4767-870C-B248F2C593E4Q40574168-9B53E53C-1F77-406D-8B89-730EEC0E6E8EQ41885949-34C60EDE-7385-46DC-8F97-4100B73FE840Q42632225-832F7C7E-7F73-4F13-B91E-9FD02437AD39Q44477053-D0048F80-279F-4710-8412-2E83C189BB63Q44501034-9218C16C-903C-4D6D-8588-B684D5851D02Q46144032-E6DDB458-90B0-419B-A463-8DD05D5D3029Q47107051-6F4E5326-05E2-48B4-BD08-15E4CE2D65EFQ47322450-75BE1846-B843-47BC-8451-4F6E07C75F55Q47590574-390F1753-45F1-40F8-9113-E6FEDE8ED240Q47716153-9B8E1EF6-C7B7-4B3B-8561-C5C8F9CADE40Q48084643-CC57C57B-90E8-4DF4-B1BE-628B88FDC3B3Q48301865-9D0B1F33-90CC-4104-9BFE-F3761ED8E310Q49804002-46F72BE0-5F53-4B58-8861-8E6A4E6CBD76Q50801919-E6E32170-050A-4A15-92E7-30CA457F717EQ52568775-705BC397-9334-4615-8108-B83C85C6C687Q53549230-CB08CF58-175A-4444-8A37-0F9F037C1668Q55426781-5B8ECF58-F968-4639-B294-3514DD97F21AQ57591837-10FBDF53-DF65-4272-A1B1-ADD5C69A41F3
P2860
A randomised trial and economic evaluation of the effect of response mode on response rate, response bias, and item non-response in a survey of doctors.
description
2011 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2011 թուականի Սեպտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2011 թվականի սեպտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2011年の論文
@ja
2011年論文
@yue
2011年論文
@zh-hant
2011年論文
@zh-hk
2011年論文
@zh-mo
2011年論文
@zh-tw
2011年论文
@wuu
name
A randomised trial and economi ...... sponse in a survey of doctors.
@ast
A randomised trial and economi ...... sponse in a survey of doctors.
@en
A randomised trial and economi ...... sponse in a survey of doctors.
@nl
type
label
A randomised trial and economi ...... sponse in a survey of doctors.
@ast
A randomised trial and economi ...... sponse in a survey of doctors.
@en
A randomised trial and economi ...... sponse in a survey of doctors.
@nl
prefLabel
A randomised trial and economi ...... sponse in a survey of doctors.
@ast
A randomised trial and economi ...... sponse in a survey of doctors.
@en
A randomised trial and economi ...... sponse in a survey of doctors.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1476
A randomised trial and economi ...... sponse in a survey of doctors.
@en
P2093
Anne Leahy
Anthony Scott
Catherine M Joyce
Guyonne Kalb
John S Humphreys
Julia Witt
Sung-Hee Jeon
P2860
P2888
P356
10.1186/1471-2288-11-126
P577
2011-09-05T00:00:00Z
P5875
P6179
1011651183