Patients in Europe evaluate general practice care: an international comparison.
about
Measuring access to primary care appointments: a review of methodsRationale, design and conduct of a comprehensive evaluation of a primary care based intervention to improve the quality of life of osteoarthritis patients. The PraxArt-project: a cluster randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN87252339]The impact of physician-nurse task shifting in primary care on the course of disease: a systematic reviewStudies analysing the need for health-related information in Germany - a systematic reviewComplementary education for healthcare personnel: a strategy to increase hospital performanceCan shared decision-making reduce medical malpractice litigation? A systematic review.Primary care-based multifaceted, interdisciplinary medical educational intervention for patients with systolic heart failure: lessons learned from a cluster randomised controlled trialTarget for improvement: a cluster randomised trial of public involvement in quality-indicator prioritisation (intervention development and study protocol)Determinants of impact of a practice accreditation program in primary care: a qualitative study.Problems and needs for improving primary care of osteoarthritis patients: the views of patients, general practitioners and practice nurses.Information and shared decision-making are top patients' prioritiesHow can the practice nurse be more involved in the care of the chronically ill? The perspectives of GPs, patients and practice nursesDoctor and practice characteristics associated with differences in patient evaluations of general practice.Patient characteristics associated with differences in patients' evaluation of their general practitionerData quality and confirmatory factor analysis of the Danish EUROPEP questionnaire on patient evaluation of general practice.The Patients Assessment Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) questionnaire in The Netherlands: a validation study in rural general practice.Patient satisfaction and side effects in primary care: an observational study comparing homeopathy and conventional medicineDoes patient satisfaction of general practice change over a decade?Primary paediatric care models and non-urgent emergency department utilization: an area-based cohort study.Protocol for the MoleMate UK Trial: a randomised controlled trial of the MoleMate system in the management of pigmented skin lesions in primary care [ISRCTN 79932379].Design of the e-Vita diabetes mellitus study: effects and use of an interactive online care platform in patients with type 2 diabetes (e-VitaDM-1/ZODIAC-40).Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in primary care: an observational pilot study of seven generic instrumentsPerceptions of quality in primary health care: perspectives of patients and professionals based on focus group discussionsDevelopment and pilot of an internationally standardized measure of cardiovascular risk management in European primary care.General practitioners' experience and benefits from patient evaluations.Patient's Utilization and Perception of the Quality of Curative Care in Community Health Centers of the Fifth Commune of BsamakoCompetition in general practice.Primary care research networks: an evolving model meriting national evaluationOrganizational determinants of high-quality routine diabetes careEffect of accreditation on the quality of chronic disease management: a comparative observational study.Hypochondriacal attitudes and beliefs, attitudes towards complementary and alternative medicine and modern health worries predict patient satisfaction.Effectiveness of improvement plans in primary care practice accreditation: a clustered randomized trialBritish residents' views about general practice care in France - a telephone surveyAssessing the potential for improvement of primary care in 34 countries: a cross-sectional surveyComparison of patients' and general practitioners' evaluations of general practice care.Comparison of requirements of research ethics committees in 11 European countries for a non-invasive interventional studyDifferences Between Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Interested and Uninterested in the Use of a Patient Platform (e-VitaDM-2/ZODIAC-41).How do GPs in Switzerland perceive their patients' satisfaction and expectations? An observational studyWhat are patients' expectations about the organization of their primary care physicians' practices?Validation of the howRu and howRwe questionnaires at the individual patient level
P2860
Q24792042-B6830D7F-C8DF-4D6F-945C-8BA55554E3FDQ24816202-E088EFD4-93B7-425C-8793-9B3122B8F78BQ26828894-C29209DF-9EC5-45AA-BCC5-40915734A9C1Q27016583-95A1E50F-78A7-4190-AC98-357378F4DC32Q27694630-6D2E0DF7-AFF4-4CAD-8D46-53DD2ED8B64BQ28085659-56AA7448-F854-402C-BEBB-58B96A1537D3Q30489956-FF5272A1-A19A-4F18-8795-081AAF339A04Q30501317-EC6F7664-3A99-411A-8D69-660A65CB8FFBQ30656562-B1FB57E8-8673-49A4-B333-940D6AAFBB53Q30817184-5C6BBBE5-AAC9-4DC7-A3B3-365557A69D48Q33235030-431469DB-83FD-4F30-ABA0-DFD2037C9C5EQ33235416-FF50637D-54C9-4939-B1F7-6121AEB9E45EQ33281090-BDC841FF-091B-46E9-8983-9F6B10B93555Q33361784-85CD7ED9-FC09-49FC-B3F9-3898A5B18187Q33365082-754EF239-637D-4B3C-BD78-F2E05A9C3FDEQ33365439-CB45389F-AAAD-43A3-9B19-5CB3067B7A5FQ33370415-C4D016DF-E94F-4856-ABB1-5C3554929B5BQ33406672-0502D1DE-5724-4F1B-80DE-C1FB79F189DBQ33570974-09008A83-5D93-41CE-8470-941069BEB8B8Q33575657-C4DF0150-3C52-4901-A348-FC6044817B54Q33591241-A6C8D938-1476-4D3A-A04E-271CB086D4EEQ33645488-3C1E9F28-A4D8-456F-84B4-2051963F8163Q33850690-F314E4D7-811A-4AB6-8921-6B53FC36B0A2Q33865199-86401D59-33B4-4AB3-BB8C-ECD794478969Q34062762-29C8B662-DB30-4BF6-8CF9-7CD5E9584381Q34131035-9969EECC-CA81-4849-BD80-993C4DA5FB82Q34137306-CD693280-10C0-4AD9-A0E7-44A8AA83DC79Q34219330-67D26E24-2B9A-404D-9215-1ED7BE736F78Q34388900-912AAAFB-4C41-44CF-BFB3-8F6FFE0D2850Q34474715-6611BD6B-6605-4EFF-9A0D-8FA6C5E92C30Q34497187-951510BF-7633-4552-B232-A3E59C3569FCQ34612351-62E2B122-0E8C-4201-BDEE-548120192E02Q34777293-73C614A5-1BD4-4641-919B-6539F9F77CE8Q35211297-5D603525-A6EE-46DE-B759-C40A61517E0EQ35561880-5DD46017-D9CF-4472-AC37-F68EC3BA1036Q35630467-55E6124F-012F-491A-988F-A6AFCCC4A5E6Q35682755-E93180E6-B259-4654-8839-568243B1B86AQ35740231-D426878A-5D3D-4ADF-AD16-B22139B7731BQ35745506-06CC5359-5A9F-46E5-910E-0A3C9C4C0840Q35797533-F0A98D3F-7572-48A0-8959-572DE48B53AE
P2860
Patients in Europe evaluate general practice care: an international comparison.
description
2000 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2000 թուականի Նոյեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2000 թվականի նոյեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2000年の論文
@ja
2000年論文
@yue
2000年論文
@zh-hant
2000年論文
@zh-hk
2000年論文
@zh-mo
2000年論文
@zh-tw
2000年论文
@wuu
name
Patients in Europe evaluate general practice care: an international comparison.
@ast
Patients in Europe evaluate general practice care: an international comparison.
@en
Patients in Europe evaluate general practice care: an international comparison.
@nl
type
label
Patients in Europe evaluate general practice care: an international comparison.
@ast
Patients in Europe evaluate general practice care: an international comparison.
@en
Patients in Europe evaluate general practice care: an international comparison.
@nl
prefLabel
Patients in Europe evaluate general practice care: an international comparison.
@ast
Patients in Europe evaluate general practice care: an international comparison.
@en
Patients in Europe evaluate general practice care: an international comparison.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1476
Patients in Europe evaluate general practice care: an international comparison.
@en
P2093
European Task Force on Patient Evaluations of General Practice Care (EUROPEP)
H Hearnshaw
J Szecsenyi
P Ferreira
P Hjortdahl
P2860
P304
P577
2000-11-01T00:00:00Z