Circumferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: not one millimeter but two millimeters is the limit.
about
Preoperative chemoradiation versus radiation alone for stage II and III resectable rectal cancerPreoperative chemoradiation versus radiation alone for stage II and III resectable rectal cancerSingle Nucleotide Polymorphisms as Prognostic and Predictive Factors of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Colorectal Cancer of Stages I and IIPathologic Assessment of Rectal Carcinoma after Neoadjuvant Radio(chemo)therapy: Prognostic ImplicationsLaparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: where do we stand?Changing the Way We Manage Rectal Cancer-Standardizing TME from Open to Robotic (Including Laparoscopic)Meta-analysis of oncological outcome after abdominoperineal resection or low anterior resection for lower rectal cancerThe Need for Consensus and Transparency in Assessing Population-Based Rates of Positive Circumferential Radial Margins in Rectal Cancer: Data from Consecutive Cases in a Large Region of Ontario, Canada.Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial.Management of locally advanced primary and recurrent rectal cancer.Impact on Loco-regional Control of Radiochemotherapeutic Sequence and Time to Initiation of Adjuvant Treatment in Stage II/III Rectal Cancer Patients Treated with Postoperative Concurrent RadiochemotherapyRevised tumor and node categorization for rectal cancer based on surveillance, epidemiology, and end results and rectal pooled analysis outcomesWhat is the significance of the circumferential margin in locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy?Abdominoperineal excision following preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: unfavorable prognosis even with negative circumferential resection marginSphincter-preserving R0 total mesorectal excision with resection of internal genitalia combined with pre- or postoperative chemoradiation for T4 rectal cancer in femalesStudy of circumferential resection margin in patients with middle and lower rectal carcinomaAssessment of T staging and mesorectal fascia status using high-resolution MRI in rectal cancer with rectal distention.Prediction of tumor stage and lymph node involvement with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI after chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.Long-term survival and recurrence outcomes following surgery for distal rectal cancer.Patterns of local recurrence in rectal cancer after a multidisciplinary approach.Clinical significance of magnetic resonance imaging findings in rectal cancer.Surgeons' Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Resections Against Standard HPE Protocol-Auditing the Surgeons.Nodal spread and micrometastasis within mesorectum.The influence of the treatment response on the impact of resection margin status after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.Pathologic processing of the total mesorectal excision.Modern management of colorectal cancer--a pathologist's view.Surgery for rectal cancer.The use of radiotherapy in rectal cancer.Methods and results of sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer.The value of high-resolution MRI technique in patients with rectal carcinoma: pre-operative assessment of mesorectal fascia involvement, circumferential resection margin and local stagingMRI in rectal cancer: the T stage and circumferential resection margin.Upfront systemic chemotherapy and preoperative short-course radiotherapy with delayed surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer with distant metastasesRobotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of eight studies.Impact of Postoperative Chemoradiotherapy versus Chemotherapy Alone on Recurrence and Survival in Patients with Stage II and III Upper Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched AnalysisQuickSilver: A Phase II Study Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging Criteria to Identify "Good Prognosis" Rectal Cancer Patients Eligible for Primary SurgeryTumor regression in rectal cancer after intensified neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a morphometric and clinicopathological study.Short-course versus standard chemoradiation in T3 rectal cancer.Violation of treatment guidelines -- hazard for rectal cancer patients.Neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer: actual status.Developments in treatment of primary irresectable rectal cancer.
P2860
Q24200568-DE48414B-33AF-4033-BEFA-B5BDC6A96C0CQ24241258-50B18876-F51D-486C-86C9-5665A06D9B5FQ26765344-746AD796-6208-466D-A835-276E90A2442EQ26778222-FC72F557-8653-4CF7-8170-150D091B5F07Q26823274-2FE8678E-066A-4040-B90B-947CA2CBACBDQ26824497-76B25C55-32BB-4530-BECC-41D0C78CCA98Q26863687-67EB2D03-3498-46C7-A12F-40E58DB28B4DQ31006026-B10AE230-4585-4DBF-80E9-855DFE3AF33CQ33415864-EF59381A-77FD-4477-A625-98651DD73B99Q33518491-1BA55098-6DF9-4049-B8AE-8B8630558330Q33619231-FAC4312A-459B-495F-AF48-653A4F609507Q33627785-1BD94E8C-3965-4FBA-9E42-9822D9770B99Q33794092-7C58C3AA-55A3-40E9-A159-8166C9E00331Q33958747-EEA0177C-F8A3-43DE-B7FA-2C42353CB772Q34100132-FBF97645-8C16-4E5B-828B-481D177B0F0CQ34233081-1B7E196B-CA26-48F0-9548-E7A8B23698FEQ34382164-C5784651-6A95-4C32-B2AD-8DF278FE9AD1Q34419142-16C62B7C-77FE-4556-9770-24E280DC54EDQ34766318-8A0456D2-3357-4FC0-9D0B-32A55B6CA2ACQ34771979-EEAE8481-0BB3-4A94-AC2F-8AC87C043970Q34885147-119BA5BF-6FF6-4EBE-AC17-951D1EFB9FDDQ34918783-1D2E6B14-97DE-4186-A4E4-9983C283F015Q35045270-2DA47E87-8C9D-4A05-AABE-AF86F8C4C1A5Q35058997-596E7ACF-F922-48C2-ACB9-1E5B824F33D2Q35109127-167F37C9-161A-4635-99C9-55266FC12D2CQ35111158-0632E3A1-D940-4BF9-AB97-535B69E6FEADQ35111171-8083A80C-383E-4A43-B2CC-8A1AB0082743Q35111178-3B9EF58C-D375-45F7-B954-47F475C7023AQ35148790-1A113C83-6CC1-456D-949A-946EEB468DAAQ35167126-2D7B9AB2-529C-4636-842F-526CDC9F8C66Q35202146-C224108F-121E-4EDD-90DB-2DC165F807D6Q35206160-8B82D08B-BA3F-4651-9FC0-32DF30C9D867Q35419094-869F5E15-C3B8-40C4-8C2B-1860019A94BEQ35526932-F029CC07-CFD1-4BA6-9592-94DDFDDA7E5AQ35548001-6A1517F9-558A-4CF8-A3AE-5F225BECD4C1Q35555993-12A3B134-B808-416D-8740-DBBBF1851E49Q35584916-CDCBE3D3-09FD-4036-BDEC-C9E7744C9F7EQ35644053-B7D0EC8E-CD65-4DBC-87FB-29D85ABFCA23Q35687452-E68847A9-B543-40B0-82FC-984ACC499F1AQ35937087-BB6F9522-24ED-4ADB-B122-8E727CCA5804
P2860
Circumferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: not one millimeter but two millimeters is the limit.
description
2002 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2002 թուականի Մարտին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2002 թվականի մարտին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2002年の論文
@ja
2002年論文
@yue
2002年論文
@zh-hant
2002年論文
@zh-hk
2002年論文
@zh-mo
2002年論文
@zh-tw
2002年论文
@wuu
name
Circumferential margin involve ...... two millimeters is the limit.
@ast
Circumferential margin involve ...... two millimeters is the limit.
@en
Circumferential margin involve ...... two millimeters is the limit.
@nl
type
label
Circumferential margin involve ...... two millimeters is the limit.
@ast
Circumferential margin involve ...... two millimeters is the limit.
@en
Circumferential margin involve ...... two millimeters is the limit.
@nl
prefLabel
Circumferential margin involve ...... two millimeters is the limit.
@ast
Circumferential margin involve ...... two millimeters is the limit.
@en
Circumferential margin involve ...... two millimeters is the limit.
@nl
P2093
P1476
Circumferential margin involve ...... t two millimeters is the limit
@en
P2093
Cooperative Clinical Investigators
Cornelis J H van de Velde
Elma Klein Kranenbarg
J Han J M van Krieken
Pathology Review Committee
P304
P356
10.1097/00000478-200203000-00009
P407
P577
2002-03-01T00:00:00Z