Comparing the incomparable? A systematic review of competing techniques for converting descriptive measures of health status into QALY-weights.
about
Review of studies mapping from quality of life or clinical measures to EQ-5D: an online databaseThe effect of late adoption of Canadian innovations: a case for implantable cardiac monitors.Predicting EQ-5D-US and SF-6D societal health state values from the Osteoporosis Assessment Questionnaire."Fibromyalgia and quality of life: mapping the revised fibromyalgia impact questionnaire to the preference-based instruments".Mapping of incontinence quality of life (I-QOL) scores to assessment of quality of life 8D (AQoL-8D) utilities in patients with idiopathic overactive bladder.Deriving a mapping algorithm for converting SF-36 scores to EQ-5D utility score in a Korean population.Predicting SF-6D utility scores from the neck disability index and numeric rating scales for neck and arm painMapping the FACT-G cancer-specific quality of life instrument to the EQ-5D and SF-6D.Should linking replace regression when mapping from profile-based measures to preference-based measures?From KIDSCREEN-10 to CHU9D: creating a unique mapping algorithm for application in economic evaluationPredicting EQ-5D utility scores from the Seattle Angina Questionnaire in coronary artery disease: a mapping algorithm using a Bayesian framework.Task-based measures of image quality and their relation to radiation dose and patient risk.Disability-adjusted-life-years losses in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a burden of illness study.Valuation of health states in the US study to establish disability weights: lessons from the literature.A Systematic Review of the Literature on the Development of Condition-Specific Preference-Based Measures of Health.Mapping of the Insomnia Severity Index and other sleep measures to EuroQol EQ-5D health state utilities.Predicting SF-6D utility scores from the Oswestry disability index and numeric rating scales for back and leg pain.Mapping health status measures to a utility measure in a study of nursing home residents with advanced dementia.Mapping health outcome measures from a stroke registry to EQ-5D weights.Applying economic principles to outcomes analysis.Mapping analyses to estimate EQ-5D utilities and responses based on Oxford Knee Score.Can we derive an 'exchange rate' between descriptive and preference-based outcome measures for stroke? Results from the transfer to utility (TTU) techniqueSocial, economic, and health utility considerations in the treatment of overactive bladder.Economic Evaluation of Add-on Levetiracetam for the Treatment of Refractory Partial Epilepsy in Korea.Converting condition-specific measures into preference-based outcomes for use in economic evaluation.Utility estimation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a preference for change?Diagnosing destabilized heart failure in the emergency setting: current and future biomarker tests.Quality-of-life loss of people admitted to burn centers, United States.Correlating patient-reported outcomes and ambulation success following microsurgical lower extremity reconstruction in comorbid patients.A Review of the Development and Application of Generic Multi-Attribute Utility Instruments for Paediatric Populations.Health-related quality of life and psychological well-being in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia: An integrative review.Mapping of the DLQI scores to EQ-5D utility values using ordinal logistic regression.Establishing utility values for the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) using a crosswalk to the EuroQol-five-dimensional questionnaire-three-level version (EQ-5D-3L).Health-state utility estimates for health technology assessment: a review of the manufacturers' submissions to the French National Authority for Health.Can Original Knee Society Scores Be Used to Estimate New 2011 Knee Society Scores?Crosswalk algorithms for the conversion of mean EQ-5D indices calculated with different value sets.Mapping from the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire PDQ-39 to the Generic EuroQol EQ-5D-3L: The Value of Mixture Models.Mapping between 6 Multiattribute Utility Instruments.fMRI evidence of a hot-cold empathy gap in hypothetical and real aversive choices.Statistical analysis of EQ-5D profiles: does the use of value sets bias inference?
P2860
Q27026613-F2B4DF44-224D-4847-A1E2-6717C0E5F71AQ33164541-98AA921D-CBCF-4A42-A300-B459F0B132A9Q33597217-C2D25A64-41D8-43BB-B431-E23B5036D5FBQ33743545-BBBC234D-E4BE-42C4-9AD1-414EF1DA21CFQ34157078-4D781AF6-ED9B-4530-A90C-809EF2D22498Q34304052-B7034554-B6D3-4B09-81E1-4AE03772DC35Q34419838-7E9CB577-E5E6-4E0A-8456-5B6EEA627762Q34455288-078A51D8-4524-4F22-92F4-A7827AE99E45Q34516058-6D2E43D9-5DD9-43C4-99D9-5BA6FB8FAB66Q34570162-7B784732-57D0-41A9-88C8-348DE3D1F51DQ34625565-AA38EEA5-1ABE-4261-8439-1ABCF53F98FDQ35053235-0E9C1F70-77BD-4947-89C4-F5703566FF46Q35354490-56B14BB3-11EC-4A99-8827-5E1975FE7D50Q35835421-5C8305CD-8CAD-4777-BD53-F70A2FA2438BQ35906213-A3A33085-F8E9-4B9E-9D78-E5EF95F16444Q36041272-52AD8396-FE80-44A5-8B9F-E561D5E94662Q36418191-D589CC40-2868-4834-A32B-7671CAE07184Q36547270-7538DEA7-84D4-44DA-85F3-B092A567A32CQ36689858-0755F02C-045E-41DF-8C34-31AD9DF48EA4Q36700224-5107CB29-0EDA-4AEC-A255-1D5C1076DAC0Q36715015-4FD76ECA-4D4F-43A9-9233-011F009AAC0CQ37187640-C0CDB771-601C-4FFD-AF3F-9831112A603DQ37283547-FFE79F1D-E0D6-468A-B0BF-8F0EEFE2C093Q37484193-C04EC7CC-7CC6-4183-B2B0-6F0EBEA1B6F9Q37763123-309CDDCE-0C63-45D6-8741-6628CBC69BABQ37944316-64AC3C38-FBD1-451B-B200-3AE988F3C467Q37970489-CFD34F94-7BBF-4EBF-9B8C-9B8B0CC732A5Q38066012-8FA324F1-81FB-465D-A07A-78EBF5D9C843Q38120710-96901606-290E-4C4F-9D81-F2BF5F284E10Q38488723-43EBA623-C249-46C5-BDAA-58F41A4F22E1Q38702302-5A7F5CF5-CB1E-4529-A7FF-7D036F4DD1FDQ38732025-3035DFA0-48C2-477E-895D-128B9F200EABQ38969855-7AACB4D6-8554-4FBA-9CDD-7A32B1C76CF9Q39108852-C95D549D-C662-4E33-9707-35339E806EBFQ39767513-7D4190E8-78BA-4EA7-957B-BBFA9E2BDB26Q39842311-2DD7EC2E-1D4D-4C55-8E96-1076ACEB16ECQ40995650-6A2FA29E-FD66-4D92-AE20-6BE5EAF9EC12Q41117203-AF3BABF7-E15E-4F8C-A21D-54236768042AQ42140815-25EB8187-67BE-48C1-A72A-B06BC5E93C48Q43872551-038C8B05-87EE-4345-85A9-CEA39329402C
P2860
Comparing the incomparable? A systematic review of competing techniques for converting descriptive measures of health status into QALY-weights.
description
2008 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2008 թուականի Յունուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2008 թվականի հունվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2008年の論文
@ja
2008年論文
@yue
2008年論文
@zh-hant
2008年論文
@zh-hk
2008年論文
@zh-mo
2008年論文
@zh-tw
2008年论文
@wuu
name
Comparing the incomparable? A ...... alth status into QALY-weights.
@ast
Comparing the incomparable? A ...... alth status into QALY-weights.
@en
Comparing the incomparable? A ...... alth status into QALY-weights.
@nl
type
label
Comparing the incomparable? A ...... alth status into QALY-weights.
@ast
Comparing the incomparable? A ...... alth status into QALY-weights.
@en
Comparing the incomparable? A ...... alth status into QALY-weights.
@nl
prefLabel
Comparing the incomparable? A ...... alth status into QALY-weights.
@ast
Comparing the incomparable? A ...... alth status into QALY-weights.
@en
Comparing the incomparable? A ...... alth status into QALY-weights.
@nl
P2860
P356
P1476
Comparing the incomparable? A ...... alth status into QALY-weights.
@en
P2860
P356
10.1177/0272989X07309642
P577
2008-01-01T00:00:00Z