A Measure of Perceived Argument Strength: Reliability and Validity.
about
Content matters: neuroimaging investigation of brain and behavioral impact of televised anti-tobacco public service announcementsIdentifying the effects of social media on health behavior: Data from a large-scale online experimentGain versus loss framing in adherence-promoting communication targeting patients with chronic diseases: the moderating effect of individual time perspectiveExperimental evaluation of antitobacco PSAs: effects of message content and format on physiological and behavioral outcomes.The effect of smoking cues in antismoking advertisements on smoking urge and psychophysiological reactions.No untoward effects of smoking cues in anti-smoking public service announcementsApplying Quantitative Approaches to the Formative Evaluation of Antismoking Campaign Messages.How real-life health messages engage our brains: Shared processing of effective anti-alcohol videos.Distraction Effects of Smoking Cues in Antismoking Messages: Examining Resource Allocation to Message Processing as a Function of Smoking Cues and Argument StrengthSmoking cues, argument strength, and perceived effectiveness of antismoking PSAs.Effects of Online Comments on Smokers' Perception of Anti-Smoking Public Service Announcements.Efficiently and Effectively Evaluating Public Service Announcements: Additional Evidence for the Utility of Perceived EffectivenessAssessing the Consequences of Implementing Graphic Warning Labels on Cigarette Packs for Tobacco-Related Health Disparities.Functional brain imaging predicts public health campaign success.Effects of smoking cues and argument strength of antismoking advertisements on former smokers' self-efficacy, attitude, and intention to refrain from smoking.Tobacco packaging and mass media campaigns: research needs for Articles 11 and 12 of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.An experimental study of the effects of electronic cigarette warnings on young adult nonsmokers' perceptions and behavioral intentions.Youth Receptivity to FDA's The Real Cost Tobacco Prevention Campaign: Evidence From Message Pretesting.Content characteristics driving the diffusion of antismoking messages: implications for cancer prevention in the emerging public communication environment.Association of BDNF and COMT genotypes with cognitive processing of anti-smoking PSAs.Women's Awareness of and Responses to Messages About Breast Cancer Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment: Results From a 2016 National Survey.The impact of smoking cues in antismoking messages among intermittent and light smokers.Effects of Temporal Framing on Response to Antismoking Messages: The Mediating Role of Perceived Relevance.Temporal framing and consideration of future consequences: effects on smokers' and at-risk nonsmokers' responses to cigarette health warnings.Message sensation and cognition values: factors of competition or integration?Effectiveness of cigarette warning labels: examining the impact of graphics, message framing, and temporal framing.Effect of Character-Audience Similarity on the Perceived Effectiveness of Antismoking PSAs via EngagementThe persuasion network is modulated by drug-use risk and predicts anti-drug message effectiveness.Perceived effectiveness rating scales applied to insomnia help-seeking messages for middle-aged Japanese people: a validity and reliability study.How Online Peer-to-Peer Conversation Shapes the Effects of a Message About Healthy Sleep.The Impact of Health Warning Labels for Swedish Snus Advertisements on Young Adults' Snus Perceptions and Behavioral Intentions.Do Emotional Appeals in Public Service Advertisements Influence Adolescents' Intention to Reduce Consumption of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages?Individual differences in the processing of smoking-cessation video messages: An imaging genetics study.Understanding public resistance to messages about health disparities.Mental Health Service Use Among Young Adults: A Communication Framework for Program Development.It's no laughing matter: An exploratory study of the use of ironic versus sarcastic humor in health-related advertising messages.
P2860
Q24621681-9C98E66F-994D-4828-A7CF-DD7590713EC5Q27313883-F9FAAF35-6F31-4FA4-B1D4-85CF4B830EB8Q28242957-91C3330C-5446-4E00-8C63-F6794AC6D6E7Q30486868-C51A3E0E-B0B9-4CF0-8017-E13D501983D6Q30486871-D44FE551-B59E-4B2C-9CBD-A20355A0F53EQ30547529-F3A9038E-684E-43D7-A07F-54BE273BABF5Q33577404-D1E92A3F-9115-4F85-A91B-8B65A2BC8682Q33852365-0023EE75-965C-495D-ACBF-E18FE3292988Q34606621-8C921733-01D7-43F8-BBFF-C5CEBCD96FCFQ34734031-6084C32F-EA2A-4E43-9557-D7B447B50E24Q34802971-E07B4FC6-61B0-46A3-BB7E-16D7FF065884Q34820106-AF74074D-9052-4D8E-8ABD-6D47E0F615C2Q36087175-D55650F5-C771-4828-87C6-B20BF302DCE0Q36521803-2D3BD3F9-7332-4160-B60C-1079CA22032FQ36535007-94ACFA72-F3F2-4C00-90D2-060C518B920EQ36697665-C56C14FD-526D-4DD3-B0CA-C01F3C956281Q36937560-D62BB9D0-3273-4949-B750-9E71F943780FQ37402022-A2E866EF-DE92-4231-9EF2-091B13BED1DDQ37608373-3E852839-198A-4075-B74B-E9488C30F8FBQ37723986-7D58B148-F788-4F50-BE0A-F36A873CAFB2Q38600299-4A0B085F-9603-4CAD-A5FC-7F94852BCD1EQ38822418-C82838FE-EBED-4DE7-BC39-4118D0CE5369Q39077909-7072CC27-C269-4E7A-83B0-AAB37A167E33Q39084703-70C73DD9-5449-4124-828E-9BA037E9A3F2Q39183996-BAA646EA-62B9-4E36-8DDF-D87AE07387E0Q39231705-48931C02-D396-4ECA-B1F6-D36E72247CE8Q41642650-4F7FABAC-D6D5-409F-9A7B-87CCF6178457Q45937402-824EA4E4-E0B4-49CB-B948-E4DD0F1AD44CQ46001494-CBC60EB0-7CDA-4FF3-8F2B-762292F97C62Q47408045-36CF9EE7-8FC1-4136-9A73-C1FA9D1A9F71Q47636871-3D5B840B-6A40-424D-A743-45BE9717B4DAQ47643790-86A4D475-4AC5-493A-83A1-2E08B21CFE2EQ47812190-27CC774B-547C-404E-8D37-19985ECBBB23Q47931107-2FDBF7FB-D259-4C79-AC2B-DF41253BE1C4Q47938177-BEF26F4F-6A37-4254-A327-766D6B889EEAQ53574006-6312A893-27AB-4DFD-AB82-C7459AC63016
P2860
A Measure of Perceived Argument Strength: Reliability and Validity.
description
2011 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2011 թուականի Մարտին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2011 թվականի մարտին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2011年の論文
@ja
2011年論文
@yue
2011年論文
@zh-hant
2011年論文
@zh-hk
2011年論文
@zh-mo
2011年論文
@zh-tw
2011年论文
@wuu
name
A Measure of Perceived Argument Strength: Reliability and Validity.
@ast
A Measure of Perceived Argument Strength: Reliability and Validity.
@en
A Measure of Perceived Argument Strength: Reliability and Validity.
@nl
type
label
A Measure of Perceived Argument Strength: Reliability and Validity.
@ast
A Measure of Perceived Argument Strength: Reliability and Validity.
@en
A Measure of Perceived Argument Strength: Reliability and Validity.
@nl
prefLabel
A Measure of Perceived Argument Strength: Reliability and Validity.
@ast
A Measure of Perceived Argument Strength: Reliability and Validity.
@en
A Measure of Perceived Argument Strength: Reliability and Validity.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1476
A Measure of Perceived Argument Strength: Reliability and Validity.
@en
P2093
Andrew Strasser
Joseph N Cappella
Martin Fishbein
Xiaoquan Zhao
P2860
P356
10.1080/19312458.2010.547822
P50
P577
2011-03-01T00:00:00Z