Benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts.
about
MRI screening for breast cancer in women at high risk; is the Australian breast MRI screening access program addressing the needs of women at high risk of breast cancer?Vision 20/20: Mammographic breast density and its clinical applicationsSpectroscopic Photoacoustic Molecular Imaging of Breast Cancer using a B7-H3-targeted ICG Contrast AgentUtility of supplemental screening with breast ultrasound in asymptomatic women with dense breast tissue who are not at high risk for breast cancerCancer Models and Real-world Data: Better Together.Qualitative Versus Quantitative Mammographic Breast Density Assessment: Applications for the US and AbroadCan mechanical imaging increase the specificity of mammography screening?The Divide Between Breast Density Notification Laws and Evidence-Based Guidelines for Breast Cancer Screening: Legislating PracticeBreast cancer screening in the era of density notification legislation: summary of 2014 Massachusetts experience and suggestion of an evidence-based management algorithm by multi-disciplinary expert panel.Fully Automated Quantitative Estimation of Volumetric Breast Density from Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images: Preliminary Results and Comparison with Digital Mammography and MR ImagingHow Can Advanced Imaging Be Used to Mitigate Potential Breast Cancer Overdiagnosis?Ultrasound as an Adjunct to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening: A Health Technology Assessment.Population-Based Precision Cancer Screening: A Symposium on Evidence, Epidemiology, and Next Steps.Synergy in combining findings from mammography and ultrasonography in detecting malignancy in women with higher density breasts and lesions over 2 cm in Albania.Background echotexture classification in breast ultrasound: inter-observer agreement study.Diagnostic performance of tomosynthesis and breast ultrasonography in women with dense breasts: a prospective comparison study.Breast Density Notification Legislation and Breast Cancer Stage at Diagnosis: Early Evidence from the SEER Registry.Risk-based Breast Cancer Screening: Implications of Breast Density.Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening: A Density Conundrum.Simulation modeling for stratified breast cancer screening - a systematic review of cost and quality of life assumptions.Comparative effectiveness of incorporating a hypothetical DCIS prognostic marker into breast cancer screening.Performance of 4 years of population-based mammography screening for breast cancer combined with ultrasound in Tyrol / Austria.Visibility of mammographically occult breast cancer on diffusion-weighted MRI versus ultrasound.Occurrence of Occult Malignancies in Reduction Mammoplasties.Comparing CISNET Breast Cancer Models Using the Maximum Clinical Incidence Reduction Methodology.The University of Wisconsin Breast Cancer Epidemiology Simulation Model: An Update.Simulating the Impact of Risk-Based Screening and Treatment on Breast Cancer Outcomes with MISCAN-Fadia.Structure, Function, and Applications of the Georgetown-Einstein (GE) Breast Cancer Simulation Model.Breast ultrasound: recommendations for information to women and referring physicians by the European Society of Breast ImagingDensity and tailored breast cancer screening: practice and prediction - an overview
P2860
Q26785571-EB5D6A04-E53E-4D96-994F-2759E24DD354Q28081408-29085E12-529D-47FB-BFD7-D06DD97CFACDQ30356039-72739CD4-7B64-4693-B704-B6A4F795B20CQ30356114-562CE393-54CB-44F8-A3C3-C7F9C9C11FEAQ31018210-A0589BC5-54C9-42B2-9D8E-04A017B45F74Q33850485-91414000-0FD3-4AB3-B942-B1E696BA900AQ33854497-2DD9405B-F2A7-4B89-881E-3054D3546571Q36042336-8AC827E4-58B7-4825-80B7-B8A163EEE18BQ36117322-EBA4D728-5261-4496-8066-52353654A773Q36762737-36E853A5-CA33-43E3-8BB5-0787036F6428Q36902060-BBE98D8F-0F7F-4D5B-8193-4ECB0A563A64Q37101470-F65AEBA8-ABE1-48B3-9954-C54C065E8AAEQ37513339-25775A41-701E-4202-98B2-0B9EAD83154FQ37657675-AA5ED787-1A3A-4C98-881B-B28367A2AFACQ38405029-66CB8BB1-95FF-41CD-8719-5FD454789D32Q38406785-F80E6F18-3C6B-46BA-B491-348C339334EDQ39187548-D4C41081-7377-4D5B-AEAF-03052835F8B0Q39347821-64E23619-A8B1-452E-AD41-CC45D8A6EA19Q40315592-FE5E5B68-340D-47D9-958B-6AC296F77A93Q47094586-7255469A-8E49-4EA7-915F-020C7C72BAC4Q47304201-B1640AD8-8590-4CB1-A852-4A288E059FCFQ47361332-7A497D43-B494-4A13-AA43-0386EA41CC0DQ50094493-15583D4D-94C6-402B-A233-F00D53E911EDQ51736808-366BB4AC-BD97-4C99-927E-CDFADA21F1D4Q51738440-BEB938DA-0D5F-4C09-9C1E-F1E6368DE6B9Q52648598-63D537FE-303D-4C18-9378-6CD606BC0CF7Q52648599-E2489E45-F9AE-4BF5-B0AE-63E0EAAD10F8Q52648603-43162749-BEF8-4655-BA9B-76AF97E2C303Q56968509-BBDA5218-DF3C-42C7-BB5D-E0EBE65509F6Q58732209-58199E53-CDEC-4B18-8972-99F47E9D4400
P2860
Benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts.
description
2015 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2015 թուականի Փետրուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2015 թվականի փետրվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2015年の論文
@ja
2015年論文
@yue
2015年論文
@zh-hant
2015年論文
@zh-hk
2015年論文
@zh-mo
2015年論文
@zh-tw
2015年论文
@wuu
name
Benefits, harms, and cost-effe ...... for women with dense breasts.
@ast
Benefits, harms, and cost-effe ...... for women with dense breasts.
@en
type
label
Benefits, harms, and cost-effe ...... for women with dense breasts.
@ast
Benefits, harms, and cost-effe ...... for women with dense breasts.
@en
prefLabel
Benefits, harms, and cost-effe ...... for women with dense breasts.
@ast
Benefits, harms, and cost-effe ...... for women with dense breasts.
@en
P2093
P2860
P356
P1476
Benefits, harms, and cost-effe ...... for women with dense breasts.
@en
P2093
Anna N A Tosteson
Brian L Sprague
Clyde Schechter
Constance D Lehman
Diana L Miglioretti
Harry J de Koning
Jeanne S Mandelblatt
Jeroen J van den Broek
Karla Kerlikowske
Mucahit Cevik
P2860
P304
P356
10.7326/M14-0692
P407
P577
2015-02-01T00:00:00Z