Is there any empirical support for biodiversity offset policy?
about
Bigger is better: Improved nature conservation and economic returns from landscape-level mitigationEnvironmental offsets, resilience and cost-effective conservationAssessing biodiversity loss due to land use with Life Cycle Assessment: are we there yet?Integrating human responses to climate change into conservation vulnerability assessments and adaptation planning.Anthropogenic ecosystem disturbance and the recovery debt.A global review of past land use, climate, and active vs. passive restoration effects on forest recoveryA meta-analysis of functional group responses to forest recovery outside of the tropics.A global meta-analysis on the ecological drivers of forest restoration success.Leaf litter arthropod responses to tropical forest restoration.Ecological Equivalence Assessment Methods: What Trade-Offs between Operationality, Scientific Basis and Comprehensiveness?Accounting for Uncertainty and Time Lags in Equivalency Calculations for Offsetting in Aquatic Resources Management Programs.Impacts of invasive plants on carbon pools depend on both species' traits and local climate.Ecological restoration success is higher for natural regeneration than for active restoration in tropical forests.Outcomes from 10 years of biodiversity offsetting.The jury is still out on biodiversity offsets: reply to Quétier et al..Biodiversity offsets are one solution to widespread poorly compensated biodiversity loss: a response to Curran et al..How scalable is sustainable intensification?ReCiPe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint levelEcosystem response to interventions: lessons from restored and created wetland ecosystemsNatural regeneration and biodiversity: a global meta-analysis and implications for spatial planning
P2860
Q27335512-111CFF20-8BE5-41D1-9B71-F523EC420B2BQ28608003-52ECE7EA-A300-40B1-AB0A-F97C512DCA20Q30389639-D111A136-D710-43A4-A777-D5D58A66A3AEQ31021014-DCB7CB9D-C5DD-44ED-ABDC-D15858ACFD47Q31155552-8431CDD4-D3F7-43A7-AE51-5DB9C5DB5A6DQ31159380-072728BC-86E0-4C26-B70E-17FA4CF0D69EQ35651971-CBDE7476-EAA9-4E7C-809B-0243E4E9D6C1Q36021767-2E6084BC-7EED-48E0-BC13-1AD4BF8AF01AQ36110007-20D30310-A260-4EC6-B6B1-0DF9C064F89BQ36368652-57A09542-2B97-4EA3-B2D3-8D6157DEC25CQ36376177-0CFD6AA1-2494-435D-A272-90806FF68407Q39051003-132F8219-1EAE-43E8-B5F2-731F26DF3764Q46262083-107D844D-7E80-461E-9018-C3D7663FDBE3Q46266722-5E25DF47-A18F-45FC-BA19-9700A52DBB1FQ46641720-901A71F3-5A5C-4840-85B9-B2411496B2EDQ46641725-6F0162C6-6258-4360-9511-AA9357DA1C1BQ52815990-AF594DE2-D920-4133-BCF1-581F0D60B08AQ57239240-443027AC-4345-428A-891D-65ECA08C5EF8Q57247744-FD82DD36-398A-4A9F-905A-80ED699171E8Q57565152-48198583-E453-4641-A7DD-A6C8E47C8BE0
P2860
Is there any empirical support for biodiversity offset policy?
description
2014 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2014 թուականի Յունիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2014 թվականի հունիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2014年の論文
@ja
2014年論文
@yue
2014年論文
@zh-hant
2014年論文
@zh-hk
2014年論文
@zh-mo
2014年論文
@zh-tw
2014年论文
@wuu
name
Is there any empirical support for biodiversity offset policy?
@ast
Is there any empirical support for biodiversity offset policy?
@en
type
label
Is there any empirical support for biodiversity offset policy?
@ast
Is there any empirical support for biodiversity offset policy?
@en
prefLabel
Is there any empirical support for biodiversity offset policy?
@ast
Is there any empirical support for biodiversity offset policy?
@en
P2860
P50
P356
P1476
Is there any empirical support for biodiversity offset policy?
@en
P2860
P304
P356
10.1890/13-0243.1
P577
2014-06-01T00:00:00Z