about
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics--2013 Update: A Report From the American Heart AssociationPrecision test for precision medicine: opportunities, challenges and perspectives regarding pre-eclampsia as an intervention window for future cardiovascular diseaseGuidelines for revascularization: The evidence base maturesApplication of appropriate use criteria for percutaneous coronary intervention in JapanWhat ails the practice of medicine: the Atlas has shruggedHeart disease and stroke statistics--2014 update: a report from the American Heart AssociationHeart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart AssociationAssessment of stable coronary artery disease by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: Current and emerging techniques.Patient selection for diagnostic coronary angiography and hospital-level percutaneous coronary intervention appropriateness: insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.Fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention is not a valid concept.The Practice Pattern of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Korea: Based on Year 2014 Cohort of Korean Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (K-PCI) Registry.Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization and Trends in Utilization, Patient Selection, and Appropriateness of Percutaneous Coronary InterventionRegional and hospital variations in the extent of decline in the proportion of percutaneous coronary interventions performed for nonacute indications - a nationwide population-based study.Defending waste, fraud, and abuse.Shared decision making in patients with stable coronary artery disease: PCI choice.Appropriate revascularization in stable angina: lessons from the BARI 2D trial.Drug eluting balloons for de novo coronary lesions - a systematic review and meta-analysisSymptoms and angiographic findings of patients undergoing elective coronary angiography without prior stress testingDevelopment and validation of a short version of the Seattle angina questionnaire.Inappropriateness of cardiovascular radiological imaging testing; a tertiary care referral center study.Indications for percutaneous coronary interventions performed in US hospitals: a report from the NCDR®.Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Utilization and Appropriateness across the United States.Determinants of variations in initial treatment strategies for stable ischemic heart disease.Regional differences in treatment frequency and case-fatality rates in korean patients with acute myocardial infarction using the Korea national health insurance claims database: findings of a large retrospective cohort study.Association of Physician Certification in Interventional Cardiology With In-Hospital Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Hospital percutaneous coronary intervention appropriateness and in-hospital procedural outcomes: insights from the NCDR.Analysis Of Medicare Advantage HMOs compared with traditional Medicare shows lower use of many services during 2003-09.Practice-Level Variation in Outpatient Cardiac Care and Association With Outcomes.Applying appropriate-use criteria to cardiac revascularisation in IndiaAlmanac 2011: stable coronary artery disease. The national society journals present selected research that has driven recent advances in clinical cardiology.Association of public reporting for percutaneous coronary intervention with utilization and outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries with acute myocardial infarction.Current coronary intervention controversy: who's to judge?Mortality in Medicare patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention with or without antecedent stress testing.Patient and hospital characteristics associated with inappropriate percutaneous coronary interventions.Cost-effectiveness of initial stress cardiovascular MR, stress SPECT or stress echocardiography as a gate-keeper test, compared with upfront invasive coronary angiography in the investigation and management of patients with stable chest pain: mid-teTrends in PCI volume after negative results from the COURAGE trialHospital variation in survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest.CABG in 2012: Evidence, practice and the evolution of guidelinesEffect of angina under-recognition on treatment in outpatients with stable ischaemic heart disease.Global Budgets and Technology-Intensive Medical Services.
P2860
Q22306356-3C764670-FB2C-47D2-A27B-741BAB983B5BQ26747071-EA27D146-4992-483F-BE07-7770DE8D8F49Q27002447-3B2CA61A-07A2-4F50-BB1C-66C68F1924BDQ28070382-CA65591B-57AF-4FD9-A835-408354CF05F6Q28083089-B681EB6F-8143-40D0-A7E5-4E705C92E1E6Q29547691-C5DE4272-E043-4391-9CA0-361ACAA70BB6Q30238784-0000AA01-0B13-492F-A5B5-039D7B75262DQ30361261-89113648-3A65-457F-9C38-A344A9388B51Q30844909-CFD76352-62D0-4132-872B-55CE5A606DFBQ33699147-361E2568-0043-453F-A540-310E459FDDACQ33740787-587FD1CC-95FA-4697-B807-CF2A65219A92Q33764781-7AB6C98B-91B8-4B59-BE0F-A8287F0BBBC8Q33784899-FE3862E0-6FB3-4738-9122-4F4608602111Q33839024-B66F0421-58A3-4011-A388-CCAB139B4271Q34505058-B41A586F-96DE-4D6B-BE90-C354DB94BC99Q34696317-6840FA76-5C8A-4546-B5E3-995AE96E92D2Q34711426-FA3EB4D2-47C7-405C-B1D3-2104EA483BA9Q34764210-21469CA9-AAB8-4557-B52B-008813D974E1Q34807134-B4BB9FB0-4257-45D3-80E3-18B4C93F84C3Q35060458-CDD441EF-A28D-407E-A852-DCE6AAE4A482Q35740635-C0828941-1FAC-4647-A76A-4F04A0833693Q35778511-AF197DAA-0483-4F65-B2C6-BBDE5407548AQ35847120-00846741-B276-49C1-A1C0-D9E457300A73Q36154124-EEFFC537-8638-4182-AAA8-1BA4E8807746Q36271505-D5FCDFF0-5B6B-4C55-82CC-79828294B1FFQ36460801-AD867C95-430F-4435-8271-B0448C196554Q36655842-E09402EF-6D16-4775-B96D-ADBD6C3EB513Q36714004-537BF855-69C3-40E1-B478-AD34470B6B6BQ36773041-8E0E6143-6C35-4D18-8311-15CFE88500E9Q36787252-D46554B0-AF5E-448D-9CB7-2B8C31AAC167Q36974708-60C75A98-C464-42E7-B084-403185C39EF0Q37021251-8D61D3BC-77D0-42E7-9D81-C74D2F11CA23Q37256323-5148A068-6D86-43D3-9D92-2BEDD45E8FF0Q37396789-C38EF220-D864-41BE-BB66-D40EDFEE5213Q37572029-7C9C63B6-7E59-4926-A3A7-6BD49BE3774EQ37580425-928E98A4-846A-41B3-A25C-138AB698C969Q37648452-93AB7886-3F44-4558-BCF5-393F615718EDQ37659163-34159E02-F195-40B4-A116-B30E20B95719Q37661212-D47A2DD9-5F4B-4C19-B767-CC8948A950DEQ37720059-14911881-1737-423B-BD74-58CCD3F5C2BD
P2860
description
2011 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2011年の論文
@ja
2011年論文
@yue
2011年論文
@zh-hant
2011年論文
@zh-hk
2011年論文
@zh-mo
2011年論文
@zh-tw
2011年论文
@wuu
2011年论文
@zh
2011年论文
@zh-cn
name
Appropriateness of percutaneous coronary intervention
@ast
Appropriateness of percutaneous coronary intervention
@en
type
label
Appropriateness of percutaneous coronary intervention
@ast
Appropriateness of percutaneous coronary intervention
@en
prefLabel
Appropriateness of percutaneous coronary intervention
@ast
Appropriateness of percutaneous coronary intervention
@en
P2093
P2860
P356
P1476
Appropriateness of percutaneous coronary intervention
@en
P2093
Brahmajee K Nallamothu
Gregory J Dehmer
John S Rumsfeld
Kevin Kennedy
Lloyd W Klein
Manesh R Patel
Paul S Chan
Ralph G Brindis
Ronald J Krone
W Douglas Weaver
P2860
P356
10.1001/JAMA.2011.916
P407
P577
2011-07-01T00:00:00Z