Scientific authorship. Part 1. A window into scientific fraud?
about
How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey dataReliability of disclosure forms of authors' contributionsThe quality of registration of clinical trialsRegistration of Clinical Trials: Is it Really Needed?“Excellence R Us”: university research and the fetishisation of excellenceWriters Blocked: On the Wrongs of Research Co-authorship and Some Possible Strategies for Improvement.Research misconduct and data fraud in clinical trials: prevalence and causal factors.Financial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publicationsSubmission of scientifically sound and ethical manuscripts to peer-reviewed journals - a reviewer's personal perspective on bioanalytical publications.Best practices for allocating appropriate credit and responsibility to authors of multi-authored articles.Predicting self-reported research misconduct and questionable research practices in university students using an augmented Theory of Planned BehaviorEvaluation criteria for publishing in top-tier journals in environmental health sciences and toxicology.Authorship versus "credit" for participation in research: a case study of potential ethical dilemmas created by technical tools used by researchers and claims for authorship by their creators.Authorship Issues and Conflict in the U.S. Academic Chemical CommunityScientific retractions and corrections related to misconduct findingsScientific integrity: critical issues in environmental health research.Fraud and deceit in medical research.A review of conflict of interest, competing interest, and bias for toxicologists.Scientific misconduct: a perspective from India.Rethinking authorship in the era of collaborative research.Facing to "duplicate submission" as a scientific misconductPublication fraud, dishonesty, and deceit.Five-Year Report of Croatian Medical Journal's Research Integrity Editor - Policy, Policing, or Policing Policy.Trick or treat?Influences on authorship issues: an evaluation of giving credit.In Their Own Words: Research Misconduct from the Perspective of Researchers in Malaysian Universities.Science as a Matter of Honour: How Accused Scientists Deal with Scientific Fraud in Japan.Modelling science trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure.Credit and authorship practices: educational and environmental influences.Scientific misconduct - how does it affect you?How frequently do allegations of scientific misconduct occur in ecology and evolution, and what happens afterwards?Scientific fraud in corrosion science research: A reviewScientific integrity in the digital age: data fabricationScientific fraud and the power structure of scienceTrends in Authorship Order in Biomedical Research PublicationsPressures to Publish: Catalysts for the Loss of Scientific Writing Integrity?
P2860
Q21143770-9E8AF575-28BC-402F-8C32-19BD54E498DDQ24676097-CCD9B079-86A0-4E94-BB7A-DDB3CBEAF39EQ28477261-064032D0-B603-41C2-840B-4B5EFB19BDE9Q28538225-5FB476E5-7FCA-456A-B0D5-5D721F7E7E46Q29017249-8E754E97-6D4A-4012-88B7-613AC3EA63ADQ30368179-8BEA3082-F683-49A1-91AA-1F9C9D1B5C5CQ30988223-3A0AB66F-8DCD-4CCA-9059-EEAAA3A296F4Q34042935-9AF43880-E653-488D-A522-59578451BECFQ34417429-857862D3-826D-4EBF-BD23-03C3F9550A0AQ35187431-8E590461-0372-4250-9785-2E2C8987D615Q35556111-CDEB3527-B24B-4456-AAC4-2FB5F24F374CQ35569908-A6A5E9B8-9CB8-4138-B447-C58EC41FFD0CQ36407817-FD858F87-DA11-4315-93A6-5BD65527B5CDQ36466271-9FAEC298-EA52-4799-A212-206626222E83Q36476337-ABCF6129-971E-45BA-A194-3C9ADA5FA094Q36711730-0F174279-7E1B-4085-B1FA-C4DCE78CBAD4Q36984436-C1E9321F-640B-4D5C-93F8-05E87CA21B3EQ37248649-471E5017-16CD-4004-A95B-D322206AD77CQ38260326-09B18363-2631-4306-8BB0-3B5F5333082EQ38451384-1BAD9D7C-5BD7-430B-ACC4-CD22A23706ECQ41904551-44FE654B-C3A8-435E-A70E-59058130A85EQ42177669-7AFE3F97-FA3A-43B2-B4E6-FA666446B43AQ42721375-C7F9FB47-1A0C-429C-979C-78190F52F749Q42786210-4CE13135-204D-4FF5-8EF6-DE95C8B14BF5Q44956541-7D86BD17-8DE8-43BB-A20A-59C274849F73Q47296110-F592F6A0-919A-4A78-9C28-1EF727F65C72Q47806243-22FAA265-B75E-414D-BA2D-0D10A0B5FD30Q48094320-B753DA53-7D07-4BEC-88AE-2FC1ED535BACQ48589507-597FA919-F4A9-4F55-AD29-2FDE8D29ADDFQ48635660-69238BA5-C596-4CBB-AF7F-A4D08D60A486Q48641141-5D1206AA-7100-407D-B3E1-D0B938E0F50AQ57351537-3E5C206E-25DC-44D8-BB1B-216478F04714Q57351543-F9677D30-9720-4322-8740-9549F3CE7A1BQ57351546-7FC9A881-DA7F-4832-81FC-22D423F28B31Q58536179-F2197EF1-7728-4334-A1E8-B52B656CFB6BQ58952950-EE59F803-80BC-4893-8E17-1215FB2AD9CF
P2860
Scientific authorship. Part 1. A window into scientific fraud?
description
2005 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2005年の論文
@ja
2005年論文
@yue
2005年論文
@zh-hant
2005年論文
@zh-hk
2005年論文
@zh-mo
2005年論文
@zh-tw
2005年论文
@wuu
2005年论文
@zh
2005年论文
@zh-cn
name
Scientific authorship. Part 1. A window into scientific fraud?
@ast
Scientific authorship. Part 1. A window into scientific fraud?
@en
type
label
Scientific authorship. Part 1. A window into scientific fraud?
@ast
Scientific authorship. Part 1. A window into scientific fraud?
@en
prefLabel
Scientific authorship. Part 1. A window into scientific fraud?
@ast
Scientific authorship. Part 1. A window into scientific fraud?
@en
P1433
P1476
Scientific authorship. Part 1. A window into scientific fraud?
@en
P356
10.1016/J.MRREV.2004.07.003
P407
P577
2005-01-01T00:00:00Z