Industry support and correlation to study outcome for papers published in Spine.
about
Non-steroidal antiandrogen monotherapy compared with luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonists or surgical castration monotherapy for advanced prostate cancerIndustry sponsorship and research outcomeThe evidence on surgical interventions for low back disorders, an overview of systematic reviewsLessons from the infuse trials: do we need a classification of bias in scientific publications and editorials?Moving forward from rhBMP-2: open science and data sharingAssessment of occlusion curriculum in predoctoral dental education: report from ACP Task Force on Occlusion Education.Reporting bias and other biases affecting systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a methodological commentary.Disclosing conflicts of interest in German publications concerning health services research.Relationship between Research Outcomes and Risk of Bias, Study Sponsorship, and Author Financial Conflicts of Interest in Reviews of the Effects of Artificially Sweetened Beverages on Weight Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Reviews.The Navigation Guide systematic review methodology: a rigorous and transparent method for translating environmental health science into better health outcomesConflict of interest in spine research reporting.Post-implementation surveillance of a non-pharmacological health technology within a national health service.Association of industry sponsorship and positive outcome in randomised controlled trials in general and abdominal surgery: protocol for a systematic review and empirical studyBone grafting options for lumbar spine surgery: a review examining clinical efficacy and complications.Industry and evidence-based medicine: Believable or conflicted? A systematic review of the surgical literature.Potential conflicts of interest of editorial board members from five leading spine journalsThe relationship between the outcome of studies of autologous chondrocyte implantation and the presence of commercial funding.Evidence-based practice: limitations and successful implementation.Bias towards publishing positive results in orthopedic and general surgery: a patient safety issue?Reporting of sources of funding in systematic reviews in periodontology and implant dentistry.Bias in cervical total disc replacement trials.Association between bibliometric parameters, reporting and methodological quality of randomised controlled trials in vascular and endovascular surgery.Financial ties of principal investigators and randomized controlled trial outcomes: cross sectional study.Ethical considerations of authorship.Financial disclosures of authors involved in spine research: an underestimated source of bias.Characteristics of funding of clinical trials: cross-sectional survey and proposed guidance.Spine surgeons: spine industry.In Support of EHP's Proposal to Adopt the ARRIVE Guidelines.Conrad and Becker's "10 Criteria" fall short of addressing conflicts of interest in chemical safety studies.Passing the headline test.A duty to participate in research: does social context matter?Influences and conflicts of federal policies in academic–industrial scientific collaboration
P2860
Q24193722-78DA4C6D-4FC3-4F0E-8F86-8CB031B6540BQ24202591-8350E2A5-36A0-49A2-A27A-0F96C3933B0DQ26822782-8E0C2F59-9753-4183-9A95-D4DB6114850EQ28606705-76E43744-ED25-4ED7-BE7F-816FD7DAB567Q28660290-632DAE37-F4BD-4F4F-9CDB-D5A6E752EF4DQ30423260-57085E1D-518A-429D-982D-E18D38D245A6Q30484545-56FEBFC0-7AAB-4DF1-B5C3-2FBCB480F84BQ33286439-E9ED6CD2-3EDF-417A-A281-CE939E3F682EQ34047368-2B355C25-7216-43DA-8B5D-D7DB953633B9Q34275302-CDC7B99E-9C5C-4154-9B43-DF3FDA60D876Q34406597-85CC167B-1753-4CF4-A005-C74C05B2BBC4Q34661788-DF3D49D3-A1A9-48AA-924B-8318ECF2CF5EQ34794434-8323A648-BAC9-4CBB-A88B-0135ADECCDA8Q35194313-D56D6706-C81E-42F3-8BA3-881577FE2ABAQ35372675-127B44AF-7F3F-4152-9EC1-CC977D2F75A1Q35652410-84B1E49C-6352-40A0-841F-A35525EF513FQ36886692-5DAA957B-C1C1-4890-B26D-7095D17187BDQ36994824-A9705C08-B03C-44B3-9DA8-607E0F9D987AQ37083747-9F1578D5-913B-4A5F-A842-DA62FFFBE3A7Q38185927-644F4C4E-51E5-4940-BCB1-4D295CAE6A43Q38740564-DB790440-6BAE-4185-A4F9-EEC4683F3B9FQ38851151-EABC57FE-B4FE-4F12-8E19-A50EF3530087Q41742515-553CC6E4-F31A-4D91-8014-E08B7AC117D6Q41771478-8351C6C1-E134-44C4-8CB3-B8844EF6B043Q42224363-037AD484-2AD0-45D1-99E0-6F76F7A23121Q42376739-D6A20BE5-8010-4EDF-A96B-B5A3F088551EQ42405262-0B02BA92-3982-483F-ACCF-D1F2E5879054Q42837018-9213D466-5808-4D6B-8F91-9E606DD8F3E3Q43059133-79DE5F3D-4821-4FFF-ACB7-F1CE32DEF8AEQ53172212-B2D318CE-5846-415A-9F2A-66A25FA27DDEQ56897213-1CC2A837-E5A5-4ADD-A6FB-24D2CC095BABQ57961490-633DEC28-3169-4329-B76F-4CFE50E35447
P2860
Industry support and correlation to study outcome for papers published in Spine.
description
2005 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2005年の論文
@ja
2005年論文
@yue
2005年論文
@zh-hant
2005年論文
@zh-hk
2005年論文
@zh-mo
2005年論文
@zh-tw
2005年论文
@wuu
2005年论文
@zh
2005年论文
@zh-cn
name
Industry support and correlation to study outcome for papers published in Spine.
@ast
Industry support and correlation to study outcome for papers published in Spine.
@en
type
label
Industry support and correlation to study outcome for papers published in Spine.
@ast
Industry support and correlation to study outcome for papers published in Spine.
@en
prefLabel
Industry support and correlation to study outcome for papers published in Spine.
@ast
Industry support and correlation to study outcome for papers published in Spine.
@en
P2093
P1433
P1476
Industry support and correlation to study outcome for papers published in Spine.
@en
P2093
Alan S Hilibrand
Alexander R Vaccaro
Jonathan N Grauer
Rahul V Shah
Todd J Albert
Victoria Bruegel-Sanchez
P304
1099-104; discussion 1105
P356
10.1097/01.BRS.0000161004.15308.B4
P407
P577
2005-05-01T00:00:00Z