about
Views on the peer review system of biomedical journals: an online survey of academics from high-ranking universitiesImpact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysisPre-referral rectal artesunate in severe malaria: flawed trial.The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors.Submission policy, peer-review and editorial board members: interesting conflicts and conflicts of interest.
P2860
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on 15 March 2010
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Problems with peer review.
@en
Problems with peer review.
@nl
type
label
Problems with peer review.
@en
Problems with peer review.
@nl
prefLabel
Problems with peer review.
@en
Problems with peer review.
@nl
P356
P1433
P1476
Problems with peer review.
@en
P2093
Mark Henderson
P356
10.1136/BMJ.C1409
P407
P577
2010-03-15T00:00:00Z