about
Mechanism change in a simulation of peer review: from junk support to elitismResearch blogs and the discussion of scholarly informationThe evolution of peer review as a basis for scientific publication: directional selection towards a robust discipline?Commentary: peer review and incomplete reference lists.Is there "self plagiarism" and "salami" publishing in JASMS?Published analysis of contraceptive effectiveness of Daysy and DaysyView app is fatally flawed.Editorial Misconduct—Definition, Cases, and Causes
P2860
Q28657604-4EF0200F-8BF8-4793-83B5-D9E0D9D9EC91Q28730020-54D38C4D-A51B-4180-B6B6-7A2401EEA70BQ34471308-9CCDE562-5DDB-4633-9522-6115B6DA8C0EQ38162488-609CA4F2-B1DE-4BAD-8ACF-1DAC20C31497Q48235226-B8C6A24D-9B7E-4586-A963-F0B2A7E5A924Q55427487-AD88788B-650E-453C-BB8B-56C2FCE74728Q58043111-05996DC8-DD51-4CDD-81A9-D1CE897558F6
P2860
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articol științific
@ro
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@gl
artigo científico
@pt
artigo científico
@pt-br
artikel ilmiah
@id
artikull shkencor
@sq
artículo científico
@es
name
Science publishing: The paper is not sacred.
@en
Science publishing: The paper is not sacred.
@nl
type
label
Science publishing: The paper is not sacred.
@en
Science publishing: The paper is not sacred.
@nl
prefLabel
Science publishing: The paper is not sacred.
@en
Science publishing: The paper is not sacred.
@nl
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
Science publishing: The paper is not sacred.
@en
P2093
Adam Marcus
P2860
P2888
P304
P356
10.1038/480449A
P407
P50
P577
2011-12-21T00:00:00Z
P5875
P6179
1001824540