Measuring the benefits of health promotion programmes: application of the contingent valuation method.
about
A study of the user's perception of economic value in nursing visits to primary care by the method of contingent valuationWillingness to pay for ovulation induction treatment in case of WHO II anovulation: a study using the contingent valuation methodEconomic valuation of health care services in public health systems: a study about Willingness to Pay (WTP) for nursing consultations.Exploring Outcomes to Consider in Economic Evaluations of Health Promotion Programs: What Broader Non-Health Outcomes Matter Most?A qualitative study on the views of experts regarding the incorporation of non-health outcomes into the economic evaluations of public health interventions.Predictors of willingness to pay for physical activity of socially vulnerable groups in community-based programs.Outcomes in Economic Evaluations of Public Health Interventions in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Health, Capabilities and Subjective Wellbeing'Side effects' of health promotion: an example from Austrian schools.Valuing Meta-Health Effects for Use in Economic Evaluations to Inform Reimbursement Decisions: A Review of the Evidence.A cost-effectiveness analysis of a community-based diabetes prevention program in Sweden.Consumer willingness to invest money and time for benefits of lifestyle behaviour change: an application of the contingent valuation method.Assessment of willingness to pay for expanded carrier screening among women and couples undergoing preconception carrier screeningEconomic evaluation of healthcare technology improving the quality of social life: the case of assistive technology for the disabled and elderlyEl concepto de willingness-to-pay en tela de juicioDo Cash Transfers Crowd Out Community Investment in Public Goods? Lessons from a Field Experiment on Health Education
P2860
Q34038644-563F5004-060D-4487-BAC0-DB0ADA79CE36Q34337614-93367ADE-D139-432B-AE03-5EC1479F2ACCQ34693441-97FB4832-1B98-4D31-A463-547E180CA782Q35690039-D6F250AA-4654-4EFE-AFC7-4E4720684075Q35785654-B6AF897E-FE09-4182-BFA2-428DEE52CFBBQ36074531-5B21A842-6919-48A0-9809-7EE0F1DFFF32Q37295853-AA7BA063-78F4-4258-B5C9-65D10BDBA664Q38373391-9170A35F-1D61-427F-A9BE-A6A1A53236A2Q39011868-735EA4EA-7D45-4865-ABDA-06A3B63DA00BQ39961808-7DF02003-61FF-4D36-BC01-47AC127260AEQ48067860-4CDB5A49-49EF-4C94-B613-2CECDB1C8617Q57071839-B1263E2F-FD72-4D04-B82A-2E7FCB97F3CFQ58305261-208A8969-7388-44E9-9332-771CBA3803DDQ58895318-7F994E96-6D2D-4FF7-A3C8-6EBF17ED8EDDQ59151971-812552E5-A08B-4196-A710-E260D4761DC7
P2860
Measuring the benefits of health promotion programmes: application of the contingent valuation method.
description
2008 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2008年の論文
@ja
2008年学术文章
@wuu
2008年学术文章
@zh-cn
2008年学术文章
@zh-hans
2008年学术文章
@zh-my
2008年学术文章
@zh-sg
2008年學術文章
@yue
2008年學術文章
@zh
2008年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Measuring the benefits of heal ...... e contingent valuation method.
@en
type
label
Measuring the benefits of heal ...... e contingent valuation method.
@en
prefLabel
Measuring the benefits of heal ...... e contingent valuation method.
@en
P1433
P1476
Measuring the benefits of heal ...... e contingent valuation method.
@en
P304
P356
10.1016/J.HEALTHPOL.2008.01.004
P577
2008-03-04T00:00:00Z