The impact of 2D versus 3D quantitation of tumor bulk determination on current methods of assessing response to treatment.

The impact of 2D versus 3D quantitation of tumor bulk determination on current methods of assessing response to treatment.

Item
http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q39436519
Agreement between competing imaging measures of response of hepatocellular carcinoma to yttrium-90 radioembolization.Automated tumor volumetry using computer-aided image segmentation.Comparison of 1-, 2-, and 3-Dimensional Tumor Response Assessment After Neoadjuvant GTX-RT in Borderline-Resectable Pancreatic Cancer.Comparison of semi-automatic volumetric VX2 hepatic tumor segmentation from cone beam CT and multi-detector CT with histology in rabbit modelsSemiautomatic volumetric tumor segmentation for hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison between C-arm cone beam computed tomography and MRI.Three-dimensional Radiologic Assessment of Chemotherapy Response in Ewing Sarcoma Can Be Used to Predict Clinical Outcome.Improved segmentation of low-contrast lesions using sigmoid edge model.The effect of lung volume on nodule size on CT.Recurrent glioblastoma: volumetric assessment and stratification of patient survival with early posttreatment magnetic resonance imaging in patients treated with bevacizumab.[Imaging in oncology: terms and definitions].Radiological evaluation of oncologic treatment response: current update.CT assessment of tumour response to treatment: comparison of linear, cross-sectional and volumetric measures of tumour size.Single and multidimensional measurements underestimate neuroblastoma response to therapy.Comparison of volumetric methods for tumor measurements on two and three dimensional MRI in adult glioblastoma.Volumetric evaluation of hepatic tumors: multi-vendor, multi-reader liver phantom study.Three-Dimensional Segmentation of the Tumor in Computed Tomographic Images of Neuroblastoma.
P2860

The impact of 2D versus 3D quantitation of tumor bulk determination on current methods of assessing response to treatment.

Item
http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q39436519
description
1996 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1996年の論文
@ja
1996年学术文章
@wuu
1996年学术文章
@zh-cn
1996年学术文章
@zh-hans
1996年学术文章
@zh-my
1996年学术文章
@zh-sg
1996年學術文章
@yue
1996年學術文章
@zh
1996年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
The impact of 2D versus 3D qua ...... sessing response to treatment.
@en
The impact of 2D versus 3D qua ...... sessing response to treatment.
@nl
type
label
The impact of 2D versus 3D qua ...... sessing response to treatment.
@en
The impact of 2D versus 3D qua ...... sessing response to treatment.
@nl
prefLabel
The impact of 2D versus 3D qua ...... sessing response to treatment.
@en
The impact of 2D versus 3D qua ...... sessing response to treatment.
@nl
P1433
P1476
P2093
P304
P31
P356
P433
P478
P577
P698
P356
P1433
P1476
The impact of 2D versus 3D qua ...... sessing response to treatment.
@en
P2093
P304
P31
P356
10.1097/00004728-199611000-00011
P433
P478
P577
P698