Does surgical quality improve in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: an evaluation of all participating hospitals.
about
Change in Adverse Events After Enrollment in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisThe effect of neoadjuvant radiation therapy on perioperative outcomes among patients undergoing resection of retroperitoneal sarcomasReducing healthcare costs facilitated by surgical auditing: a systematic reviewDevelopment of an annually updated Japanese national clinical database for chest surgery in 2014Surgical research using national databasesUse of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in orthopaedic surgery.The use of report cards and outcome measurements to improve the safety of surgical care: the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.Association between hospital imaging use and venous thromboembolism events rates based on clinical data.Comparison of National Operative Mortality in Gastroenterological Surgery Using Web-based Prospective Data Entry Systems.Truth in Reporting: How Data Capture Methods Obfuscate Actual Surgical Site Infection Rates within a Health Care Network System.Delivering High-Quality Cancer Care: The Critical Role of Quality Measurement.Are They Too Old for Surgery? Safety of Cholecystectomy in Superelderly Patients (≥ Age 90)Incidence of adverse events in an integrated US healthcare system: a retrospective observational study of 82,784 surgical hospitalizations.Academic Pancreas Centers of Excellence: Guidance from a multidisciplinary chronic pancreatitis working group at PancreasFest.Preoperative risk factors for postoperative Clostridium difficile infection in colectomy patients.Defining the potential of neoadjuvant chemotherapy use as a quality indicator for bladder cancer care.Reliability of the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status scale in clinical practice.Risk-adjusted pathologic margin positivity rate as a quality indicator in rectal cancer surgerySurgeon's experiences of receiving peer benchmarked feedback using patient-reported outcome measures: a qualitative studyCost and Mortality Associated With Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury.The impact of perioperative packed red blood cell transfusion on survival in epithelial ovarian cancer.Efficacy of contemporary chemotherapy in stage IIIC endometrial cancer: a histologic dichotomy.Association of hospital participation in a quality reporting program with surgical outcomes and expenditures for Medicare beneficiariesTrends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery.Is American College of Surgeons NSQIP organ space infection a surrogate for pancreatic fistula?Reliability of surgeon-specific reporting of complications after colectomyNurse specialty certification, inpatient mortality, and failure to rescue.Risk-scoring models for individualized prediction of overall survival in low-grade and high-grade endometrial cancer.Which clinical scenarios do surgeons record as complications? A benchmarking study of seven hospitals.Is There an Association between Component Separation and Venous Thromboembolism? Analysis of the NSQIPLaparoscopic vs open partial colectomy in elderly patients: Insights from the American College of Surgeons - National Surgical Quality Improvement Program databaseThe power of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program--achieving a zero pneumonia rate in general surgery patients.30-Day morbidity after augmentation enterocystoplasty and appendicovesicostomy: A NSQIP pediatric analysis.Outcomes after emergency abdominal surgery in patients with advanced cancer: Opportunities to reduce complications and improve palliative careRisk Models of Operative Morbidities in 16,930 Critically Ill Surgical Patients Based on a Japanese Nationwide DatabaseDetecting adverse events in surgery: comparing events detected by the Veterans Health Administration Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the Patient Safety IndicatorsNormothermia to prevent surgical site infections after gastrointestinal surgery: holy grail or false idol?Application of traditional indexes and adverse events in the ophthalmologic perioperative medical quality evaluation during 2010-2012.Bile duct surgery in the treatment of hepatobiliary and gallbladder malignancies: effects of hepatic and vascular resection on outcomesEarly Experience with a Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Quality Improvement Program.
P2860
Q26774365-F237F6E6-FB70-4CD6-B29F-61AC7EAFD55EQ26823110-F724908F-B52A-4C6B-BC7C-A9E318EF2383Q26862994-6FF6217A-B1DF-42CB-BA17-18835BFA0162Q28069677-CF76494D-CF05-45DB-BE1B-41CD98B83DE9Q28074788-FE6E2BB1-0E38-4F08-8C8B-0884757E1CB8Q30359310-E86EFB55-C819-496D-9DE7-4B51A5BCF5C6Q30411950-8933DCFE-8678-4B7C-A33D-80AFA24F52F8Q30842217-B0114BE2-C1D5-427D-8AAE-D93B03994DCBQ31031588-A6CE403B-750D-4643-8840-46052D2FC85EQ31147383-5DD66F26-C357-4C67-B70A-A34EBEEA014DQ33613935-3DED9FA4-6260-4BFB-A8BD-0BD77BE7B07BQ33655784-8A5038EE-CD39-43A9-98ED-777516F5BBE4Q33749713-622C1E19-2BDA-4BAF-9638-ECD23219CBA0Q33925978-D270DC1F-F1F4-4295-BE3F-B9CB09200476Q33993544-F29D89A0-2BBC-4DB5-B020-AA07A5AD1364Q34021124-3040750A-000C-40FA-A709-CDEC82697E48Q34059922-0C53B527-C11A-48C1-A1DB-BBDD6FE77D26Q34172017-75909298-3C4F-4925-9403-9A7E0C45B5A7Q34486196-2F5A5F6F-857C-4EC7-8FFD-484BB803B6A5Q34588749-4F22D4F5-A5EC-4413-83A4-3B2BD90B970DQ35013695-2949266E-855A-412D-AC7E-54330F6D5CADQ35024980-7AE64E41-90EB-45ED-819F-600B81038B04Q35111770-0C28BE3E-202B-4BE8-8522-BFA3361303F8Q35148007-FC029E21-1139-4C6D-AFEA-AA0F6355DF55Q35283262-6404FD40-5285-4313-96AD-EAF0817DE98AQ35298470-2577E05A-AD17-47A5-9BED-FC76B1A08D10Q35447125-F5015156-69A4-42F0-9506-6AB5A0F2F4E4Q35510284-90F1FB0A-A6DA-4C10-B715-E650C5CCD705Q35691638-7440D752-4050-4AF7-8F10-7E356887C8D6Q35827391-0159C84E-BABF-4E83-8E27-6AE147C5B8CCQ35868932-F4C7DE6E-D4F7-482C-A608-BF0526A16F3CQ35890815-DD731EFB-720B-4060-9991-F685C0DA770CQ35967611-85BD250A-E906-4C39-83BE-1009C2922569Q36002972-E2A5F387-4310-480E-8A80-A31405CB0516Q36009346-753C913A-EDC1-43AD-A213-06F04C622783Q36020028-68F4F45C-299A-4E16-B826-2CD82496CCF0Q36100688-7BD8CD86-089E-4A0E-AC05-32A5B5C9CE38Q36243081-C56FDD66-E079-4DE0-AE5C-3BF272BD7AB6Q36278659-1EACAB65-1D31-407F-8966-584731ED07EEQ36330642-4B88C241-7AE0-4558-B7EE-E2AD7C5B91CF
P2860
Does surgical quality improve in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: an evaluation of all participating hospitals.
description
2009 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2009年の論文
@ja
2009年学术文章
@wuu
2009年学术文章
@zh-cn
2009年学术文章
@zh-hans
2009年学术文章
@zh-my
2009年学术文章
@zh-sg
2009年學術文章
@yue
2009年學術文章
@zh
2009年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Does surgical quality improve ...... f all participating hospitals.
@en
Does surgical quality improve ...... f all participating hospitals.
@nl
type
label
Does surgical quality improve ...... f all participating hospitals.
@en
Does surgical quality improve ...... f all participating hospitals.
@nl
prefLabel
Does surgical quality improve ...... f all participating hospitals.
@en
Does surgical quality improve ...... f all participating hospitals.
@nl
P2093
P1433
P1476
Does surgical quality improve ...... f all participating hospitals.
@en
P2093
Barton H Hamilton
Bruce L Hall
Clifford Y Ko
Karen Richards
Karl Y Bilimoria
Mark E Cohen
P304
P356
10.1097/SLA.0B013E3181B4148F
P407
P577
2009-09-01T00:00:00Z