Comparison of Coronary CT Angiography, SPECT, PET, and Hybrid Imaging for Diagnosis of Ischemic Heart Disease Determined by Fractional Flow Reserve.
about
Coronary microvascular dysfunction and future risk of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Automated SPECT analysis compared with expert visual scoring for the detection of FFR-defined coronary artery disease.Predictors of severe stenosis at invasive coronary angiography in patients with normal myocardial perfusion imaging.Implementation of a cardiac PET stress program: comparison of outcomes to the preceding SPECT era.Emerging Tracers for Nuclear Cardiac PET ImagingDiabetes and Subclinical Coronary Atherosclerosis
P2860
Comparison of Coronary CT Angiography, SPECT, PET, and Hybrid Imaging for Diagnosis of Ischemic Heart Disease Determined by Fractional Flow Reserve.
description
2017 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2017年の論文
@ja
2017年論文
@yue
2017年論文
@zh-hant
2017年論文
@zh-hk
2017年論文
@zh-mo
2017年論文
@zh-tw
2017年论文
@wuu
2017年论文
@zh
2017年论文
@zh-cn
name
Comparison of Coronary CT Angi ...... ed by Fractional Flow Reserve.
@en
type
label
Comparison of Coronary CT Angi ...... ed by Fractional Flow Reserve.
@en
prefLabel
Comparison of Coronary CT Angi ...... ed by Fractional Flow Reserve.
@en
P2093
P2860
P50
P1433
P1476
Comparison of Coronary CT Angi ...... ed by Fractional Flow Reserve.
@en
P2093
Aernout G Somsen
Albert C van Rossum
Arthur A van Lingen
Chris Naoum
Cornelis van Kuijk
Ibrahim Danad
Igor I Tulevski
James K Min
Kimberly Elmore
Maija Mäki
P2860
P356
10.1001/JAMACARDIO.2017.2471
P577
2017-08-16T00:00:00Z