The characteristics of peer reviewers who produce good-quality reviews.
about
Peer review and the publication processAnnals of Medicine and Surgery - A modern Journal for Modern Trainees.The relationship of previous training and experience of journal peer reviewers to subsequent review qualityReviewing manuscripts for biomedical journals.Does mentoring new peer reviewers improve review quality? A randomized trialReviewing scientific papersHow I review an original scientific article.Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial.How to review a surgical paper: a guide for junior referees.What makes the best medical ethics journal? A North American perspective.The scholarship of critical review: improving quality and relevance.Manuscript peer review: a guide for advanced practice nurses.Efficacy of Double-Blind Peer Review in an Imaging Subspecialty Journal.Academic Primer Series: Key Papers About Peer Review.Being critical and constructive: a guide to peer reviewing for librarians.Reviewers chosen by authors.How to Be an Outstanding Reviewer for the Journal of General Internal Medicine … and Other Journals.Group Peer Review: The Breakfast of Champions.Quality of the Reviews Submitted by Attendees of a Workshop on Peer Review.What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them?Behind the shroud: a survey of editors in ecology and evolutionEditor and reviewer gender influence the peer review process but not peer review outcomes at an ecology journal
P2860
Q28076160-C653F1DD-B4F9-4A89-84A4-5851BE7ADF96Q30488204-1283B881-D8AC-449D-B27C-E7456444B29AQ33281282-59464004-919E-4016-A927-116823B7787AQ34030771-732E491E-8DF2-401F-A223-A2CFC2CE8A82Q34396523-82CA27A6-D443-473E-ADA4-E570771990C8Q34796202-BABC4900-F159-48CF-A3CB-AC9B80565B43Q34962898-97F95E98-120F-4CFF-B519-D109D3BE2C44Q35680672-55CCEB55-4BF1-41F9-A157-806301FA4971Q35923295-DFA32794-4816-427A-9660-6294E300A8F9Q36274704-7457B425-3D5D-4161-B381-EF812087CA8BQ37004438-000F8E1C-420F-4CD8-96C2-5843DA73B0A9Q37826225-F493D7C3-080E-4CAA-A788-5DDFE2BEF33CQ39011265-B344922B-0F0A-4C85-BC3A-E52BAF23B274Q39371003-790C5B73-0558-43F2-9523-7A86C9169C5BQ42330683-B6EE9A5D-4B73-4BC9-9D09-9F7B62545F3CQ42871313-4123D496-F0FE-4B30-A6AB-92C78C501CE1Q46019513-90A00BBF-4B09-4C68-9C15-664AE551D5B4Q46793468-9DD344C4-D3D2-40D9-8605-0E4C487E4D88Q47101389-05971D8B-04AF-4757-923F-FCFBDBED6204Q55656859-A62B97B0-5A44-483C-B414-ADBCBA608CBEQ56949666-776B2E4F-E8A6-40F0-B947-2EA2E0F518CBQ58042238-F94A8D01-6F94-48D0-A447-98E9AF583B2D
P2860
The characteristics of peer reviewers who produce good-quality reviews.
description
1993 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1993年の論文
@ja
1993年論文
@yue
1993年論文
@zh-hant
1993年論文
@zh-hk
1993年論文
@zh-mo
1993年論文
@zh-tw
1993年论文
@wuu
1993年论文
@zh
1993年论文
@zh-cn
name
The characteristics of peer reviewers who produce good-quality reviews.
@en
type
label
The characteristics of peer reviewers who produce good-quality reviews.
@en
prefLabel
The characteristics of peer reviewers who produce good-quality reviews.
@en
P2093
P356
P1476
The characteristics of peer reviewers who produce good-quality reviews.
@en
P2093
R A McNutt
R H Fletcher
S W Fletcher
P2888
P304
P356
10.1007/BF02599618
P577
1993-08-01T00:00:00Z
P6179
1020103128