STREGA, STROBE, STARD, SQUIRE, MOOSE, PRISMA, GNOSIS, TREND, ORION, COREQ, QUOROM, REMARK... and CONSORT: for whom does the guideline toll?
about
Enhancing the reporting and transparency of rheumatology research: a guide to reporting guidelinesStrengthening the reporting of genetic risk prediction studies (GRIPS): explanation and elaboration.Strengthening the reporting of genetic risk prediction studies (GRIPS): explanation and elaborationGuidelines for Reporting Medical Research: A Critical AppraisalThe reporting quality of studies investigating the diagnostic accuracy of anti-CCP antibody in rheumatoid arthritis and its impact on diagnostic estimatesImmunohistochemical hENT1 expression as a prognostic biomarker in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma undergoing adjuvant gemcitabine-based chemotherapy.Do emergency medicine journals promote trial registration and adherence to reporting guidelines? A survey of "Instructions for Authors"Setting the RECORD straight: developing a guideline for the REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely collected DataStrengthening the reporting of Genetic RIsk Prediction Studies: the GRIPS Statement.Statistical analysis of arthroplasty data. I. Introduction and background.Funding source and research report quality in nutrition practice-related research.Is quality and completeness of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in high impact radiology journals associated with citation rates?Evaluation of reporting quality of the 2010 and 2012 National Surgical Congress oral presentations by CONSORT, STROBE and Timmer criteria.Development of EULAR recommendations for the reporting of clinical trial extension studies in rheumatology.Evaluating the impact and use of Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Non-randomised Designs (TREND) reporting guidelines.Assessment of clinically related outcomes and biomarker analysis for translational integration in colorectal cancer (ACROBATICC): study protocol for a population-based, consecutive cohort of surgically treated colorectal cancers and resected colorecElevated level of nerve growth factor in the bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis: a meta-analysisEvidence-based neurosurgery. Basic concepts for the appraisal and application of scientific information to patient care (Part II).A survey of the awareness, knowledge, policies and views of veterinary journal Editors-in-Chief on reporting guidelines for publication of research.Analysis of reporting quality for oral presentations of observational studies at 19th National Surgical Congress: Proposal for a national evaluation systemProposal of guidelines for the appraisal of SEMen QUAlity studies (SEMQUA).Reporting standards in cardiac MRI, CT, and SPECT diagnostic accuracy studies: analysis of the impact of STARD criteria.Reporting quality of search methods in systematic reviews of HIV behavioral interventions (2000-2010): are the searches clearly explained, systematic and reproducible?Did the reporting of prognostic studies of tumour markers improve since the introduction of REMARK guideline? A comparison of reporting in published articles.Essentials of research methods in neurosurgery and allied sciences for research, appraisal and application of scientific information to patient care (Part I)Hematology journals do not sufficiently adhere to reporting guidelines: a systematic review.STROBE-ME too!Commentary: statistics for biomarkers.Using observational studies for comparative effectiveness: finding quality with GRACE.Thymidylate synthase: a predictive biomarker in resected colorectal liver metastases receiving 5-FU treatment.Interpretation of correlations in clinical research.Strengthening the reporting of genetic risk prediction studies: the GRIPS statement.Strengthening the reporting of genetic risk prediction studies (GRIPS): explanation and elaborationTwenty-five years of Australian nursing and allied health professional journals: bibliometric analysis from 1985 through 2010Reporting guidelines and the American Journal of Public Health's adoption of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-AnalysesDebating diversity: a commentary on Standards of practice in empirical bioethics researchDiagnostic accuracy in field conditions of the sickle SCAN® rapid test for sickle cell disease among children and adults in two West African settings: the DREPATEST study
P2860
Q24288897-7DEED0ED-E57B-4A37-A1B6-1C130E5706D9Q24289354-CA643276-B327-4C61-91F7-CDEAC8469C41Q24289476-5B9C69BE-E8FF-45F3-B384-7487EE9C488EQ26744249-1FA34E47-6AF3-4F22-9DD5-38EE5B4592C5Q27025258-AB50A42E-AE60-4262-BEFB-8BE792EE41E0Q30238470-3B7719E2-CFBB-4753-9C31-9C4A107D8A1BQ30395573-B488C1E7-A3A1-4639-B3E3-E91DC646AC51Q30588907-924EDBB3-A4DB-4B4D-AFE7-2A17A6FF5E1EQ33851304-BA07DF0D-4D2B-4C96-B0D9-6CE31355AD8FQ33914164-75BA2BA9-EBE0-4273-86A9-D18D93DFFE8EQ34097858-533C8830-3269-4138-8825-695925796DBEQ35182421-CB2559B0-ACD8-4CAB-A99C-2AD4656D9BBDQ35233528-9E418FA7-69E0-4B4A-989E-CA126544F48AQ35605474-4B8922D8-CFD6-4F88-A62D-8BD8DDA38F5CQ36496634-CDA19066-F222-4952-AAF8-84278C4C1F44Q37054795-6F250EB6-D486-43EB-B912-2406EFD59C2EQ37092523-AE71D1D0-90DC-430C-BD36-A34043C001B2Q37410899-01FEAFE5-0437-4138-9CB2-10EA9F029F9CQ37581022-9813F970-8021-4C24-926D-E5432CC6E825Q37594374-0201DF7A-511B-4A42-98DF-F6209BD217FBQ38051091-37DC70A0-DF05-4F8A-B44A-3D551F41DC47Q38181463-5C2B8610-5A7F-46E4-85FD-95F99AF3F2D1Q38519997-C05C78C0-8BAE-4099-B48C-117F5C497F0EQ38671095-0CF94FA8-1A29-4B4E-BFF4-5E3A9EEF2505Q38812207-0952DF2D-7337-4526-9911-43FD5BED39C1Q38999596-2ED35846-9A9D-47F2-8B63-0E5FC7BE8EF7Q39168233-63683BCF-DF39-413A-A975-B91E946EF660Q46755900-5A6FF2DA-92B2-4178-9B8F-ED7843333E0BQ46972051-4BEB1406-F53E-4395-A179-AD7C0C945F5CQ47741359-1F81BDA7-55BE-403F-88B7-B8517A40D163Q48310704-C09AF09C-AC3B-4BF3-9696-567F8588BD1CQ55228077-FD6FC01B-8D58-4913-9F8F-52B3EF07CC45Q56632047-11DE6D5F-AC76-48CA-B58B-059CDC494A04Q57919637-2204ADF1-C37A-4884-ADFA-0DB311C7E1FAQ57971041-136C4D82-72A1-4CCA-A18D-973C4DAF83A8Q58657320-BE66288B-8D4B-463F-AA73-16BC892BBBFFQ58732847-1380DD4A-DB35-446D-B555-40FA1E4267F3
P2860
STREGA, STROBE, STARD, SQUIRE, MOOSE, PRISMA, GNOSIS, TREND, ORION, COREQ, QUOROM, REMARK... and CONSORT: for whom does the guideline toll?
description
2009 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2009年の論文
@ja
2009年学术文章
@wuu
2009年学术文章
@zh
2009年学术文章
@zh-cn
2009年学术文章
@zh-hans
2009年学术文章
@zh-my
2009年学术文章
@zh-sg
2009年學術文章
@yue
2009年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
STREGA, STROBE, STARD, SQUIRE, ...... whom does the guideline toll?
@en
STREGA, STROBE, STARD, SQUIRE, ...... whom does the guideline toll?
@nl
type
label
STREGA, STROBE, STARD, SQUIRE, ...... whom does the guideline toll?
@en
STREGA, STROBE, STARD, SQUIRE, ...... whom does the guideline toll?
@nl
prefLabel
STREGA, STROBE, STARD, SQUIRE, ...... whom does the guideline toll?
@en
STREGA, STROBE, STARD, SQUIRE, ...... whom does the guideline toll?
@nl
P1476
STREGA, STROBE, STARD, SQUIRE, ...... whom does the guideline toll?
@en
P2093
Jan P Vandenbroucke
P304
P356
10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2008.12.003
P577
2009-01-31T00:00:00Z