Protection of obstetric dimensions in a small-bodied human sample.
about
A wider pelvis does not increase locomotor cost in humans, with implications for the evolution of childbirthGlobal geometric morphometric analyses of the human pelvis reveal substantial neutral population history effects, even across sexesBiocultural perspectives on maternal mortality and obstetrical death from the past to the presentThe obstetric dilemma: an ancient game of Russian roulette, or a variable dilemma sensitive to ecology?Dimorphism in the Size and Shape of the Birth Canal Across Anthropoid Primates.Mechanical Constraints on the Hominin Pelvis and the "Obstetrical Dilemma".Patterns of directional asymmetry in the pelvis and pelvic canal.Geometric morphometrics reveals restrictions on the shape of the female os coxae.Shape variation in the human pelvis and limb skeleton: Implications for obstetric adaptation.Selective pressures in the human bony pelvis: Decoupling sexual dimorphism in the anterior and posterior spaces.Bony pelvic canal size and shape in relation to body proportionality in humans.Sexual dimorphism in the size and shape of the os coxae and the effects of microevolutionary processes.Pelvic Inlet Shape Is Not as Dimorphic as Previously Suggested.Pelvic Rotation Effect on Human Stride Length: Releasing the Constraint of Obstetric Selection.Bilateral Asymmetry in the Human Pelvis.The Biomechanical and Energetic Advantages of a Mediolaterally Wide Pelvis in Women.Human Variation in Pelvic Shape and the Effects of Climate and Past Population History.Morphological Integration of the Human Pelvis with Respect to Age and Sex.Allometry of head and body size in Holocene foragers of the South African Cape.Skeletal variability in the pelvis and limb skeleton of humans: does stabilizing selection limit female pelvic variation?
P2860
Q28258675-682B0159-9A3F-45DF-9132-821D4ED768B3Q28709098-C998455B-89B7-4C0A-86D0-E0F1E08FC3CFQ30051970-4EADD499-D35E-4C09-B1A0-E4ACEDB42903Q34310696-F7606021-9B75-4DB6-BBF4-8C20DC1AD8D8Q38838585-61E458D8-3370-4658-BB29-326FC5C3EA0EQ38838599-0559CA5B-9FA8-4A15-AF2F-50815EE21235Q38862612-91713133-0756-4B51-B29F-B71F7CDFF787Q39530885-B868CB40-527E-43FD-8E08-24299F5FE075Q40176865-2DB23482-B04C-456B-9A00-483D5BD1892BQ41264781-64AE9871-3892-4B67-A5FB-5A1580750024Q44787574-FA19B9D1-CE62-4E86-8C20-C7CF906F71DEQ46972401-09E0C6DA-BF6C-46DB-A023-715C1101787DQ47227518-3E011A7B-4ABD-4E69-8EFC-685BC7D3FB3DQ47227529-3EF417A4-257E-4F0D-9FD7-59A693BCF3C2Q47227550-DFFADDE0-A0B2-4FB5-98B6-04627F16E155Q47227562-5B30CF79-5D98-4311-8AEB-876B65BC4EB3Q47227569-E6C50CA8-E823-4B2D-83BC-E3FA725D5F30Q47227580-662249B7-C679-46F3-A3E6-BEE673C85629Q47230563-DEC2FEAA-9B51-4654-B0E5-D6AAF56C8632Q47710659-9515138E-AFDD-4712-9C96-21384B185F16
P2860
Protection of obstetric dimensions in a small-bodied human sample.
description
2007 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2007年の論文
@ja
2007年学术文章
@wuu
2007年学术文章
@zh
2007年学术文章
@zh-cn
2007年学术文章
@zh-hans
2007年学术文章
@zh-my
2007年学术文章
@zh-sg
2007年學術文章
@yue
2007年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Protection of obstetric dimensions in a small-bodied human sample.
@en
Protection of obstetric dimensions in a small-bodied human sample.
@nl
type
label
Protection of obstetric dimensions in a small-bodied human sample.
@en
Protection of obstetric dimensions in a small-bodied human sample.
@nl
prefLabel
Protection of obstetric dimensions in a small-bodied human sample.
@en
Protection of obstetric dimensions in a small-bodied human sample.
@nl
P356
P1476
Protection of obstetric dimensions in a small-bodied human sample
@en
P2093
Helen K Kurki
P304
P356
10.1002/AJPA.20636
P577
2007-08-01T00:00:00Z