Grey literature: An important resource in systematic reviews.

about

Grey literature: An important resource in systematic reviews.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q47268563

description

2017 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2017年の論文

@ja

2017年学术文章

@wuu

2017年学术文章

@zh

2017年学术文章

@zh-cn

2017年学术文章

@zh-hans

2017年学术文章

@zh-my

2017年学术文章

@zh-sg

2017年學術文章

@yue

2017年學術文章

@zh-hant

name

Grey literature: An important resource in systematic reviews.

@en

Grey literature: An important resource in systematic reviews.

@nl

type

Item

label

Grey literature: An important resource in systematic reviews.

@en

Grey literature: An important resource in systematic reviews.

@nl

prefLabel

Grey literature: An important resource in systematic reviews.

@en

Grey literature: An important resource in systematic reviews.

@nl

P1476

Grey literature: An important resource in systematic reviews

@en

P2093

Arsenio Paez

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Systematic reviews of epidemiology in diabetes: finding the evidence

Timing and completeness of trial results posted at ClinicalTrials.gov and published in journals

Publication bias in clinical research

Users' guides to the medical literature. VI. How to use an overview. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

Efficiency of searching the grey literature in palliative care.

The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence.

Searching one or two databases was insufficient for meta-analysis of observational studies.

Hypothalamopituitary dysfunction following traumatic brain injury and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review.

Grey literature in meta-analyses.

GH deficiency after traumatic brain injury: improvement in quality of life with GH therapy: analysis of the KIMS database.

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1111/JEBM.12265

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Arsenio Paez

P577

2017-12-21T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

29266844

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string