about
Evaluation of the informatician perspective: determining types of research papers preferred by clinicians.Are Mendeley reader counts high enough for research evaluations when articles are published?Towards reproducibility in recommender-systems researchRecommender system with grey wolf optimizer and FCMMovie recommender system with metaheuristic artificial beeThe Closer the Better: Similarity of Publication Pairs at Different Cocitation LevelsBag of works retrieval: TF*IDF weighting of works co-cited with a seed
P2860
Q33896249-736657E6-3A8F-444D-991A-AC4103A25B10Q56220047-A911E5B5-609B-446C-9A95-7A3D48E24CA8Q56341833-925D0F27-09D0-4687-B298-AB15F021F053Q57553292-1F697082-FF7C-4C45-BFC0-B7A676B03519Q57553298-B51F85B3-0784-4064-B13B-99B44FA0D289Q57986600-6C7382CE-C851-4459-88F3-4ABFF43014C4Q58231373-FBC9B275-37C6-4F1E-9FFF-577461AA440B
P2860
description
2015 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2015年の論文
@ja
2015年学术文章
@wuu
2015年学术文章
@zh
2015年学术文章
@zh-cn
2015年学术文章
@zh-hans
2015年学术文章
@zh-my
2015年学术文章
@zh-sg
2015年學術文章
@yue
2015年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Research-paper recommender systems: a literature survey
@en
Research-paper recommender systems: a literature survey
@nl
type
label
Research-paper recommender systems: a literature survey
@en
Research-paper recommender systems: a literature survey
@nl
prefLabel
Research-paper recommender systems: a literature survey
@en
Research-paper recommender systems: a literature survey
@nl
P2860
P50
P1476
Research-paper recommender systems: a literature survey
@en
P2093
Stefan Langer
P2860
P2888
P304
P356
10.1007/S00799-015-0156-0
P577
2015-07-26T00:00:00Z