What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences? - Test2 - elhamkhani - TriplyDB

What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences?

What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences?

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q53282277

about

The peer review process for awarding funds to international science research consortia: a qualitative developmental evaluation.'Are you siding with a personality or the grant proposal?': observations on how peer review panels function.

P2860

Q48156369-41834C5B-C682-4EA4-BB69-026F3C9057F4 Q49932276-FEBC8134-5266-4585-9D9F-785A3C588C64

P2860

What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences?

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q53282277

description

2017 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2017年の論文

@ja

2017年学术文章

@wuu

2017年学术文章

@zh

2017年学术文章

@zh-cn

2017年学术文章

@zh-hans

2017年学术文章

@zh-my

2017年学术文章

@zh-sg

2017年學術文章

@yue

2017年學術文章

@zh-hant

name

What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences?

@en

What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences?

@nl

type

label

What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences?

@en

What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences?

@nl

prefLabel

What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences?

@en

What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences?

@nl

P1433

Q53282277-FFDE508F-0A47-489F-AAE8-147B91461146

P1476

Q53282277-461D8A2D-E746-421B-B366-E4046107883F

P2093

Q53282277-7147ACD0-BEF2-484D-ADC2-CC8C3127B078

P2860

Q53282277-023C9C75-F605-46C0-80FD-BA23A3CECC86

Q53282277-027ECBA3-CD35-4452-A7EB-575623A526C3

Q53282277-03CCD734-9951-4234-A439-7577508FE6CC

Q53282277-0C45C9BE-5669-4750-8639-2B036EB129F1

Q53282277-1373C515-DF53-4A92-9873-98E17C1F2116

Q53282277-150F7419-9209-43C2-971E-DECE38000354

Q53282277-17C4AF0E-E5CE-4566-9E7B-636D72A544FD

Q53282277-1A7F2D10-1F1B-4503-808E-03D43EE9E2CF

Q53282277-1B41F53F-FBDB-493C-8EBF-FEBD421AA96F

Q53282277-204759EA-9CF3-43B4-A04B-8F065E58F74B

P304

Q53282277-89F34B79-1F54-47F7-8610-4822DEA82490

P31

Q53282277-7AF8C055-5703-4C2A-AD22-C94A0C9DCCCA

P356

Q53282277-19B13AC8-F0A6-40EE-9B45-6BBBA786A312

Q53282277-867C8EC2-1F12-42C1-AF4F-2DA18C4DCB16

P478

Q53282277-CB58DC1F-EA14-4421-9FCE-69EB35A8B5D2

P50

Q53282277-36ECF1DF-AC81-4AD2-B876-15B86DCF278E

Q53282277-60C46B3D-26A1-4FA9-ABA2-56F2A1FCBC89

P577

Q53282277-C128EE48-D03B-4316-AA49-17BA2637EF57

P698

Q53282277-77E921BE-24BB-4355-8425-4F74A62EA52F

P932

Q53282277-41B228E2-E213-48FD-A4F6-0891F42466EC

P356

F1000RESEARCH.11917.1

F1000RESEARCH.11917.2

P1433

P1476

What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences?

@en

P2093

Ioana Ghiga

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Funding Science: The Real Defects of Peer Review and An Alternative To It

Using simplified peer review processes to fund research: a prospective study

Chance and consensus in peer review

Cost of the NSERC Science Grant Peer Review System Exceeds the Cost of Giving Every Qualified Researcher a Baseline Grant

Rescuing US biomedical research from its systemic flaws

Predicting Productivity Returns on Investment: Thirty Years of Peer Review, Grant Funding, and Publication of Highly Cited Papers at the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

Research Funding: the Case for a Modified Lottery

NIH peer review percentile scores are poorly predictive of grant productivity

NIH Peer Review: Scored Review Criteria and Overall Impact

Reforming science: structural reforms

P304

1335

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.12688/F1000RESEARCH.11917.1

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

10.12688/F1000RESEARCH.11917.2

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

6

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

P577

2017-08-07T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

29707193

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

5883382

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string