Randomized single versus double embryo transfer: obstetric and paediatric outcome and a cost-effectiveness analysis.
about
Metabolomics for improving pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing assisted reproductive technologiesNumber of embryos for transfer following in vitro fertilisation or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injectionPreimplantation mouse embryo selection guided by light-induced dielectrophoresisClinical effectiveness of elective single versus double embryo transfer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trialsCost Implications for Subsequent Perinatal Outcomes After IVF Stratified by Number of Embryos Transferred: A Five Year Analysis of Vermont Data.Long term costs and effects of reducing the number of twin pregnancies in IVF by single embryo transfer: the TwinSing study.Is ICSI Risky?The effect of single embryo transfer on perinatal outcomes in JapanSingle vitrified blastocyst transfer maximizes liveborn children per embryo while minimizing preterm birth.In vitro fertilization and multiple pregnancies: an evidence-based analysis.Morbidity and mortality among very preterm singletons following fertility treatment in Australia and New Zealand, a population cohort study.Long-term follow-up of children conceived through assisted reproductive technology.Economic evaluation of highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin versus recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone in fresh and frozen in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm-injection cycles in Sweden.Approaches to improve the diagnosis and management of infertilityTrends in the use of intracytoplasmatic sperm injection marked variability between countries.Elective single embryo transfer: guidelines for practice British Fertility Society and Association of Clinical Embryologists.A theoretical model for single blastocyst transfer.Costs of achieving live birth from assisted reproductive technology: a comparison of sequential single and double embryo transfer approaches.Optimizing the number of embryos to transfer on day 5: two should be the limit.Is it safe to prescribe clomiphene citrate without ultrasound monitoring facilities?The paediatric consequences of Assisted Reproductive Technologies, with special emphasis on multiple pregnancies.Elective Single Embryo Transfer: an update to UK Best Practice Guidelines.Metabolomics for improving pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing assisted reproductive technologies.Double trouble: should double embryo transfer be banned?Cost-effectiveness of embryo transfer strategies: a decision analytic model using long-term costs and consequences of singletons and multiples born as a consequence of IVF.Is there a detrimental effect of higher gonadotrophin dose on clinical pregnancy rate in normo-responders undergoing ART with long protocol?Refuting a misguided campaign against the goal of single-embryo transfer and singleton birth in assisted reproduction.The impact of single embryo transfer policy on pregnancy outcomes after legislative change.Factors affecting obstetric outcome of singletons born after IVF.Treatment period and medical care costs to achieve the first live birth by assisted reproductive technology are lower in the single embryo transfer period than in the double embryo transfer period: a retrospective analysis of women younger than 40 yAutophagic activity as an indicator for selecting good quality embryos.Double embryo transfer gives good pregnancy and live birth rates in poor responders with a modest increase in multiple birth rates: results from an observational study.Cost-effective approaches to in vitro fertilization: means to improve access.Deciding how many embryos to transfer: ongoing challenges and dilemmas.The dilemma faced by patients who undergo single embryo transfer.Is mandating elective single embryo transfer ethically justifiable in young women?
P2860
Q24187540-3EA7C1BF-1171-4689-AAB8-6243940F5DEDQ24201012-32B78830-D847-4622-9737-74163FF9CBDFQ27331492-43DD8574-FB77-417D-BDD7-33DEB53756B0Q28744051-6639D0BA-CCD5-40B5-B431-00BE5E89B01AQ31057246-421D175E-286D-482B-97FA-707C29ADF63CQ33723461-E0BDA8E7-6B7C-41E8-B31C-81DAF0C325CCQ34338565-DE921A71-7D6B-4E49-AEB7-0B473A2186EBQ34784749-A10949B5-0F92-405C-88C1-48314D3ABE92Q35689045-CE9AC688-96B4-488C-9DFA-EA1B9BF88422Q36047003-841F4C73-7E1A-41D2-B7EB-3502723327EAQ36266707-CB03608F-B35B-4B96-974D-8ECD957D0199Q36832799-D03A399B-C62A-4DCC-B54E-640B8AE40B48Q37099603-20CEF488-F90D-4D98-BFB3-1E866660BFE0Q37214916-F7C8B663-780C-4D7A-A037-839EFEE3F89DQ37245639-33B66E5A-BAF4-48F2-A273-AEAEA83B0FBAQ37259350-00D7D938-0C01-4061-B576-5BB2F4B71C62Q37313057-C672820C-AE43-432F-B488-E1D65AC63984Q37444447-35AD3E13-CABD-41A3-8EDC-BDAE19E5C721Q37720448-EA9312F7-DF55-49CF-AB42-1313C3FB2A95Q37747467-A30C6760-49B9-4F35-A579-BF2A5C2DF8D9Q38070689-03D2254F-9D7F-4A29-AFCC-33D8D641A796Q38590592-E1612BAA-9E97-44AF-AD5C-753982A831C7Q38769403-1AF98B8E-88E7-4EBD-A4E9-2BAC77DFE544Q39024784-95464800-AA8D-47E9-BF2B-87AAE71FA07AQ39138941-55846966-92FE-43A0-B00B-A0206586425BQ43431688-6AF7839B-8243-4114-A6CA-C84B4766A83DQ43476409-322EBC45-3D43-4E20-887F-E83218C13B7AQ45035182-2AFE8C39-BCA0-40ED-A3F5-74B234EA7EFBQ45081659-9EC4B816-8C08-4819-8D58-C9CBA6DBDD15Q46710244-3E3E486F-06B7-4668-ABB2-30DD97EFDD57Q47162647-126E66C6-8040-4EA3-8A1E-47BB1EF2E5E8Q48678069-F3AAE1B2-DB47-40A8-8178-1B942CCCF736Q50646891-8C63B85A-8E48-4A3B-9F16-19FC369CCCC8Q53656880-6717DE7D-394A-487F-805D-43C840C8747CQ55114538-6409BF65-A908-45CB-AC4E-4CE877C42FC4Q55343517-EE15A9B4-10E9-4CC0-ACB6-20C2F15384EF
P2860
Randomized single versus double embryo transfer: obstetric and paediatric outcome and a cost-effectiveness analysis.
description
2005 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2005年の論文
@ja
2005年学术文章
@wuu
2005年学术文章
@zh-cn
2005年学术文章
@zh-hans
2005年学术文章
@zh-my
2005年学术文章
@zh-sg
2005年學術文章
@yue
2005年學術文章
@zh
2005年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Randomized single versus doubl ...... a cost-effectiveness analysis.
@en
Randomized single versus doubl ...... a cost-effectiveness analysis.
@nl
type
label
Randomized single versus doubl ...... a cost-effectiveness analysis.
@en
Randomized single versus doubl ...... a cost-effectiveness analysis.
@nl
prefLabel
Randomized single versus doubl ...... a cost-effectiveness analysis.
@en
Randomized single versus doubl ...... a cost-effectiveness analysis.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
Randomized single versus doubl ...... a cost-effectiveness analysis.
@en
P2093
Ann Thurin Kjellberg
Christina Bergh
Per Carlsson
P2860
P304
P356
10.1093/HUMREP/DEI298
P407
P577
2005-09-19T00:00:00Z