Deference to Scientific Authority Among a Low Information Public: Understanding U.S. Opinion on Agricultural Biotechnology
about
New media landscapes and the science information consumerCommunicating science in social settings.Influence of scientific worldviews on attitudes toward organ transplants: national survey data from the United States.The causes and circumstances of drinking water incidents impact consumer behaviour: Comparison of a routine versus a natural disaster incident.Scientists' Prioritization of Communication Objectives for Public Engagement.Reproductive modification in forest plantations: impacts on biodiversity and society.The gap in scientific knowledge and role of science communication in South Korea.Improving biotechnology communication.Opposing ends of the spectrum: Exploring trust in scientific and religious authorities.Media sources, credibility, and perceptions of science: Learning about how people learn about science.Dynamic development of public attitudes towards science policymaking.Religious beliefs, knowledge about science and attitudes towards medical genetics.Conflict or Caveats? Effects of Media Portrayals of Scientific Uncertainty on Audience Perceptions of New Technologies.Measuring risk/benefit perceptions of emerging technologies and their potential impact on communication of public opinion toward science.Disentangling the influence of value predispositions and risk/benefit perceptions on support for nanotechnology among the American public.Pathways to support genetically modified (GM) foods in South Korea: Deliberate reasoning, information shortcuts, and the role of formal education.Value predispositions as perceptual filters: Comparing of public attitudes toward nanotechnology in the United States and Singapore.Environmental Performance Information Use by Conservation Agency Staff.The National Science Foundation's science and technology survey and support for science funding, 2006-2014.Why (not) disagree? Human values and the readiness to question experts' views.Including "evidentiary balance" in news media coverage of vaccine risk.Discourse over a contested technology on Twitter: A case study of hydraulic fracturing.Public attitudes to genomic science: an experiment in information provision.Media Use and Public Perceptions of DNA EvidenceThe Power of a Picture: Overcoming Scientific Misinformation by Communicating Weight-of-Evidence Information with Visual ExemplarsThe Public's Bounded Understanding of ScienceSupport, opposition, emotion and contentious issue risk perceptionResponding to Richard: Celebrity and (mis)representation of sciencePerceived familiarity or factual knowledge? Comparing operationalizations of scientific understandingReligiosity as a perceptual filter: examining processes of opinion formation about nanotechnologyMapping the Landscape of Public Attitudes on Synthetic BiologyAttitudinal gaps: How experts and lay audiences form policy attitudes toward controversial sciencePolicy decision-making, public involvement and nuclear energy: what do expert stakeholders think and why?Science News Consumption Patterns and Their Implications for Public Understanding of ScienceThe “Nasty Effect:” Online Incivility and Risk Perceptions of Emerging TechnologiesDisagreement and Value Predispositions: Understanding Public Opinion About Stem Cell ResearchThe Role of Media and Deference to Scientific Authority in Cultivating Trust in Sources of Information about Emerging TechnologiesScience on Television in the 21st CenturyStimulating Upstream Engagement: An Experimental Study of Nanotechnology Information SeekingThe Soul of a Polarized Democracy
P2860
Q24630170-E2817C35-44D1-4ACD-9B4A-4BB4A801E638Q30221574-74E75217-388A-4BF9-9A31-7BB8C0A21F9EQ30830494-86B0FF99-20A1-424A-9FB7-D54669DCF497Q34578476-B9AB327A-C44A-4834-8C4C-36B5616F984EQ35935403-BEB8A43F-B551-4AD8-8426-41657BB14F8FQ36247202-0F00B9FC-9FCA-4A1A-B7D2-F8A9ADCD6517Q39028828-D3CC68FD-093E-4240-BE73-396D354FBF7CQ39396395-E2D53ED6-5FBC-4889-A63A-2D9E6FF1797AQ39560092-F3028993-DF25-4623-81C4-6C3EFAD8656DQ40265090-4028E2DF-21A7-4E67-A5D7-2DE1641DFBD9Q40489214-4F4A7778-54E4-4544-B53B-84DC0FA7A9A4Q44457746-FA9A2053-284E-43F7-B945-4B7BEB9E225AQ44859013-8D2FE957-A88E-43CD-B047-3789F1D1A823Q44868713-7695D8A0-B29E-4E02-9E0F-E37FFE3C2E03Q45086530-CB2D3FE4-87F9-4524-AA59-12B08D5CF941Q45283999-A1B38F92-785E-4B5D-A2A5-98EE0A88A9ADQ45393552-380EDBA9-8C2C-48C8-924E-1A98318EE5C4Q47718441-37236309-5481-49D3-9569-E3201EA870ACQ50207156-8C211F48-9830-45B9-8DA9-F5464B4B85A1Q50224874-F6CD97B9-34C8-41BC-9ED6-27F3DC1B7B2EQ50305917-644F2B1B-879A-4585-A122-8B1614A31186Q50778623-483E791E-3B5E-4544-9B03-069897AE5F69Q51691152-732B75CE-182A-4911-BF88-A78CE049035DQ56005329-90A430CB-8A2E-4D3D-BBBE-829EBE2FD4CBQ56267454-2657ACCE-00F4-4BA3-A339-394907457C49Q56803703-225B2403-AE2D-4948-A68B-FEE45BCB9089Q57051474-BAB23A94-1533-4C78-8CD8-6156A72CC58CQ57128740-2c438d45-4575-3f40-a511-60e19ebba1fdQ57484208-B7F54765-04D5-4ACB-B0CA-FC3731C7B851Q57564065-4A0B370C-638F-4898-B666-1701B5B48C81Q57751432-60CA0D27-AEF8-48C1-858D-424EAD317C0AQ57751447-B56268E3-ADEC-4D07-8F70-4C32389C55E3Q57751461-0989F3A8-CF6D-47FD-B32C-8EC65E5C3A60Q57751464-08AAC145-C797-4570-85BF-D78D7CDAA62DQ57751495-1251FCE7-9B5D-49F6-9610-C6BBEF91612CQ57751498-B4AEABC5-B9DF-4A53-BD31-B55FDA53BB03Q57751520-AA45B82A-AC75-4DE4-9339-7B2EA684B1FDQ57751533-FA3209E5-B5D5-4A16-ADEB-ABC6D134CFE9Q57751535-AC1C0CCA-4E2D-4DCE-A1C6-16ED10725BE7Q57751563-A0177BC1-EB10-444E-8811-652D9D5BFA17
P2860
Deference to Scientific Authority Among a Low Information Public: Understanding U.S. Opinion on Agricultural Biotechnology
description
im März 2006 veröffentlichter wissenschaftlicher Artikel
@de
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована в березні 2006
@uk
name
Deference to Scientific Author ...... on Agricultural Biotechnology
@en
Deference to Scientific Author ...... on Agricultural Biotechnology
@nl
type
label
Deference to Scientific Author ...... on Agricultural Biotechnology
@en
Deference to Scientific Author ...... on Agricultural Biotechnology
@nl
prefLabel
Deference to Scientific Author ...... on Agricultural Biotechnology
@en
Deference to Scientific Author ...... on Agricultural Biotechnology
@nl
P356
P1476
Deference to Scientific Author ...... on Agricultural Biotechnology
@en
P2093
D. Brossard
M. C. Nisbet
P356
10.1093/IJPOR/EDL003
P577
2006-03-13T00:00:00Z