Selecting among five common modelling approaches for integrated environmental assessment and management
about
Progress and challenges in coupled hydrodynamic-ecological estuarine modelingGlobal and regional changes in exposure to extreme heat and the relative contributions of climate and population change.An expert system model for mapping tropical wetlands and peatlands reveals South America as the largest contributor.Quantifying ecosystem quality by modeling multi-attribute expert opinion.Engaging Stakeholders in Environmental and Sustainability Decisions with Participatory System Dynamics ModelingA Bayesian network model for assessments of coastal inundation pathways and probabilitiesModeling the environmental susceptibility of landfill sites in CaliforniaDynamic modelling of the potential habitat loss of endangered species: the case of the Canarian houbara bustard (Chlamydotis undulata fuerteventurae)Feedback between sediment and light for seagrass: Where is it important?Emerging investigators series: a critical review of decision support systems for water treatment: making the case for incorporating climate change and climate extremesCombining system dynamics and agent-based modeling to analyze social-ecological interactions—an example from modeling restoration of a shallow lakeOpportunities for modelling tools to support management decision-making in Australian Marine ParksAddressing the threats to tourism sustainability using systems thinking: a case study of Cat Ba Island, VietnamDrivers of agricultural sustainability in developing countries: a reviewFour Sustainability Paradigms for Environmental Management: A Methodological Analysis and an Empirical Study Based on 30 Italian IndustriesCreating Agent-Based Energy Transition Management Models That Can Uncover Profitable Pathways to Climate Change Mitigation
P2860
Q30372716-A968C9BD-7D36-4B99-8DD0-000A04941F49Q31171492-3E68AC1D-BC39-49DB-9C59-B7FC4B88BC70Q36308626-1371F57A-C9D7-44F7-BBCA-CBFCD6A63C7CQ40340429-F3C49D2C-09AF-4D46-946B-465D2082FC3DQ56952271-0EBA771B-5A9A-4BF0-A43D-FAC9F7805B26Q57149760-2153E0AD-EBBC-43D2-82D3-D5CE1C028064Q57199273-3FCE1A48-8C2F-4FE9-9108-1B6F937A9760Q57573345-7B565DE9-10EC-4D56-A690-26F01F9A45A0Q57608417-10EC2DB9-AE5B-4A10-A47E-90C46D0D44B0Q57817953-1DA9955A-155D-443F-B5AC-4E23F81A2075Q57898094-36652F2F-44A8-47AA-9803-3A68C7F3E570Q58524239-00A2F693-7D6C-419A-BA5C-F2A267DB3CAEQ58967796-BDE72E56-B9F3-4C63-B220-3CBB1025DD5EQ58967883-A1C5176D-E3E6-4E42-A183-1A173B13F5ABQ59276886-005441AB-4B41-40A1-8572-05542DB530E0Q59318505-2B3E47E9-07AF-4A26-B3FB-FD9AD97EA8B8
P2860
Selecting among five common modelling approaches for integrated environmental assessment and management
description
article
@en
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована у вересні 2013
@uk
name
Selecting among five common mo ...... ntal assessment and management
@en
Selecting among five common mo ...... ntal assessment and management
@nl
type
label
Selecting among five common mo ...... ntal assessment and management
@en
Selecting among five common mo ...... ntal assessment and management
@nl
prefLabel
Selecting among five common mo ...... ntal assessment and management
@en
Selecting among five common mo ...... ntal assessment and management
@nl
P2093
P50
P1476
Selecting among five common mo ...... ntal assessment and management
@en
P2093
Andrea Emilio Rizzoli
Mark E. Borsuk
Olivier Barreteau
Rebecca A. Kelly (Letcher)
Serena H. Hamilton
P304
P356
10.1016/J.ENVSOFT.2013.05.005
P50
P577
2013-09-01T00:00:00Z