POWER LAW RELATIONS IN SCIENCE BIBLIOGRAPHY—A SELF‐CONSISTENT INTERPRETATION
about
Universality of citation distributions: toward an objective measure of scientific impact.Crossmaps: visualization of overlapping relationships in collections of journal papers.MODELLING THE BRADFORD PHENOMENONCOHERENT INFORMATIONAL ENERGY AND ENTROPYBIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF A NEW RESEARCH SUB‐FIELDBradford ranking conventions and their application to a growing literature
P2860
POWER LAW RELATIONS IN SCIENCE BIBLIOGRAPHY—A SELF‐CONSISTENT INTERPRETATION
description
im Februar 1971 veröffentlichter wissenschaftlicher Artikel
@de
wetenschappelijk artikel
@nl
наукова стаття, опублікована в лютому 1971
@uk
name
POWER LAW RELATIONS IN SCIENCE BIBLIOGRAPHY—A SELF‐CONSISTENT INTERPRETATION
@en
POWER LAW RELATIONS IN SCIENCE BIBLIOGRAPHY—A SELF‐CONSISTENT INTERPRETATION
@nl
type
label
POWER LAW RELATIONS IN SCIENCE BIBLIOGRAPHY—A SELF‐CONSISTENT INTERPRETATION
@en
POWER LAW RELATIONS IN SCIENCE BIBLIOGRAPHY—A SELF‐CONSISTENT INTERPRETATION
@nl
prefLabel
POWER LAW RELATIONS IN SCIENCE BIBLIOGRAPHY—A SELF‐CONSISTENT INTERPRETATION
@en
POWER LAW RELATIONS IN SCIENCE BIBLIOGRAPHY—A SELF‐CONSISTENT INTERPRETATION
@nl
P2860
P356
P1476
POWER LAW RELATIONS IN SCIENCE BIBLIOGRAPHY—A SELF‐CONSISTENT INTERPRETATION
@en
P2093
S. NARANAN
P2860
P356
10.1108/EB026510
P577
1971-02-01T00:00:00Z