Did primary healthcare user fee abolition matter? Reconsidering South Africa's experience

about

South African trends in medical aid coverage and stated healthcare-seeking preferences: 2004–14 User Fee Abolition and the Demand for Public Health Care Healthcare facility choice and user fee abolition: regression discontinuity in a multinomial choice setting

P2860

Q59325041-2CC16AD1-04CF-4BD2-A441-0FD2D7687A8E Q59325043-1115AA09-0AEF-4D48-8082-6AEC314943E0 Q59325060-93F8C24A-8652-4148-93D7-4A865EC7BDD1

P2860

Did primary healthcare user fee abolition matter? Reconsidering South Africa's experience

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q59325046

description

article

@en

im Dezember 2014 veröffentlichter wissenschaftlicher Artikel

@de

wetenschappelijk artikel

@nl

наукова стаття, опублікована в грудні 2014

@uk

name

Did primary healthcare user fee abolition matter? Reconsidering South Africa's experience

@en

Did primary healthcare user fee abolition matter? Reconsidering South Africa's experience

@nl

type

Item

label

Did primary healthcare user fee abolition matter? Reconsidering South Africa's experience

@en

Did primary healthcare user fee abolition matter? Reconsidering South Africa's experience

@nl

prefLabel

Did primary healthcare user fee abolition matter? Reconsidering South Africa's experience

@en

Did primary healthcare user fee abolition matter? Reconsidering South Africa's experience

@nl

P1476

Did primary healthcare user fee abolition matter? Reconsidering South Africa's experience

@en

P2093

Anna S Brink

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Steven F Koch

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Removing user fees: learning from international experience to support the process

User charges in government health facilities in Kenya: effect on attendance and revenue.

Examination of attendance patterns before and after introduction of South Africa's policy of free health care for children aged under 6 years and pregnant women.

The impact of user fees on health service utilization in low- and middle-income countries: how strong is the evidence?

A scoping review of the literature on the abolition of user fees in health care services in Africa.

Understanding the impact of eliminating user fees: utilization and catastrophic health expenditures in Uganda.

Abolition of cost-sharing is pro-poor: evidence from Uganda.

Dental clinic attendance in Soweto, South Africa, before and after the introduction of free primary dental health services.

Impact of user charges on vulnerable groups: the case of Kibwezi in rural Kenya.

Quality of care and the demand for health services in Bamako, Mali: the specific roles of structural, process, and outcome components.

P304

170-192

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1080/0376835X.2014.984373

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2014-12-03T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

Did primary healthcare user fee abolition matter? Reconsidering South Africa's experience

about

P2860

P2860

Did primary healthcare user fee abolition matter? Reconsidering South Africa's experience

description

name

type

label

prefLabel

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P577

P356

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P577