Bishop v. Aronov
Bishop v. Aronov, 926 F.2d 1066 (11th Cir. 1991), was a 1991 legal case in which Phillip A. Bishop, an exercise physiology professor at the University of Alabama, sued the college on free speech and academic freedom grounds, when it instructed him not to teach "intelligent design theory" in an extracurricular class and not to lecture on "evidences of God in Human Physiology" in class. The District Court for the Northern District of Alabama found in favor of Bishop but the university appealed and the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit found that the classroom, during instructional time, was not an open forum, and that the university had a right to set the curriculum.
Bishop v. Aronov
Bishop v. Aronov, 926 F.2d 1066 (11th Cir. 1991), was a 1991 legal case in which Phillip A. Bishop, an exercise physiology professor at the University of Alabama, sued the college on free speech and academic freedom grounds, when it instructed him not to teach "intelligent design theory" in an extracurricular class and not to lecture on "evidences of God in Human Physiology" in class. The District Court for the Northern District of Alabama found in favor of Bishop but the university appealed and the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit found that the classroom, during instructional time, was not an open forum, and that the university had a right to set the curriculum.
has abstract
Bishop v. Aronov, 926 F.2d 106 ...... ia University of Pennsylvania.
@en
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
681,094,737
citations
date decided
1991-03-15
full name
Phillip A. Bishop v. Aaron M. ...... s of the University of Alabama
name
Bishop v. Aronov
opinions
Floyd R. Gibson
prior actions
District Court ruled in favor of Bishop
subject
comment
Bishop v. Aronov, 926 F.2d 106 ...... a right to set the curriculum.
@en
label
Bishop v. Aronov
@en