Connecticut v. Doehr
Connecticut v. Doehr, 501 U.S. 1 (1991), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a state statute authorizing prejudgment attachment of a defendant's real property upon the filing of an action, without prior notice or hearing, without a showing of extraordinary circumstances, and without a requirement that the plaintiff post a bond, violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Wikipage redirect
primaryTopic
Connecticut v. Doehr
Connecticut v. Doehr, 501 U.S. 1 (1991), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a state statute authorizing prejudgment attachment of a defendant's real property upon the filing of an action, without prior notice or hearing, without a showing of extraordinary circumstances, and without a requirement that the plaintiff post a bond, violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
has abstract
Connecticut v. Doehr, 501 U.S. ...... e of the Fourteenth Amendment.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
14,521,398
Wikipage revision ID
725,437,696
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
citation
Concurrence
DecideDate
DecideYear
Holding
A state law authorizing the pr ...... e of the Fourteenth Amendment.
JoinConcurrence
JoinMajority
unanimous ; Rehnquist, Blackmun, Marshall, Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter
JoinPlurality
Marshall, Stevens, O'Connor
Litigants
Connecticut v. Doehr
Plurality
Prior
Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
SCOTUS
subject
comment
Connecticut v. Doehr, 501 U.S. ...... e of the Fourteenth Amendment.
@en
label
Connecticut v. Doehr
@en
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
Connecticut v. Brian K. Doehr
@en