Jackson v A-G
R (Jackson) v Attorney General [2005] UKHL 56 is a House of Lords case noted for containing obiter comments by the Judiciary acting in their official capacity suggesting that there may be limits to parliamentary sovereignty, the orthodox position being that it is unlimited in the United Kingdom.
primaryTopic
Jackson v A-G
R (Jackson) v Attorney General [2005] UKHL 56 is a House of Lords case noted for containing obiter comments by the Judiciary acting in their official capacity suggesting that there may be limits to parliamentary sovereignty, the orthodox position being that it is unlimited in the United Kingdom.
has abstract
R (Jackson) v Attorney General ...... as solely a judicial creation.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
14,826,118
Wikipage revision ID
737,510,410
appealed from
Court of Appeal
citations
date decided
2005-10-13
full name
Regina v Attorney General
italic title
judges
keywords
number of judges
opinions
The Parliament Act 1911 could ...... the Parliament Acts procedure.
prior actions
Divisional Court
transcripts
subject
hypernym
type
comment
R (Jackson) v Attorney General ...... limited in the United Kingdom.
@en
label
Jackson v A-G
@en
