Nichols v Jessup
Nichols v Jessup [1986] 1 NZLR 226, is a New Zealand case regarding unconscionable bargains, and it set the threshold for an unconscionable bargain is that the stronger party did not have to have actual knowledge of the other party having a disability (to negotiate), but merely that the stronger party should have had suspicions that the other party had a disability.
primaryTopic
Nichols v Jessup
Nichols v Jessup [1986] 1 NZLR 226, is a New Zealand case regarding unconscionable bargains, and it set the threshold for an unconscionable bargain is that the stronger party did not have to have actual knowledge of the other party having a disability (to negotiate), but merely that the stronger party should have had suspicions that the other party had a disability.
has abstract
Nichols v Jessup [1986] 1 NZLR ...... other party had a disability.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
40,091,164
Wikipage revision ID
642,735,788
citations
[1986] 1 NZLR 226
court
Court of Appeal of New Zealand
date decided
1986-09-26
full name
Paul Anthony Nichols v Eileen Noella Jessup
keywords
unconscionable bargain
name
Nichols v Jessup
transcripts
subject
hypernym
comment
Nichols v Jessup [1986] 1 NZLR ...... other party had a disability.
@en
label
Nichols v Jessup
@en
