Citizens United v. FEC
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, No. 08-205, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a U.S. constitutional law and corporate law case dealing with the regulation of campaign spending by organizations. The United States Supreme Court held (5–4) that freedom of speech prohibited the government from restricting independent political expenditures by a nonprofit corporation. The principles articulated by the Supreme Court in the case have also been extended to for-profit corporations, labor unions and other associations.
Wikipage disambiguates
08-205558 U.S. 310Citizen's UnitedCitizens UnitedCitizens United V. Federal Election CommissionCitizens United caseCitizens United decisionCitizens United rulingCitizens United v. FEC, PFAWCitizens United v. Fed. Election Comm'nCitizens United v. Federal Election Comm'nCitizens United v. Federal Election CommissionCitizens United v. Federal Election Comm’nCitizens United v FECCitizens United v Federal Election CommissionCitizens United vs. FECCitizens unitedCitizens united v fecDemocracy Is Strengthened by Casting Light On Spending in Elections ActFEC v Citizens' United
Wikipage redirect
primaryTopic
Citizens United v. FEC
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, No. 08-205, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a U.S. constitutional law and corporate law case dealing with the regulation of campaign spending by organizations. The United States Supreme Court held (5–4) that freedom of speech prohibited the government from restricting independent political expenditures by a nonprofit corporation. The principles articulated by the Supreme Court in the case have also been extended to for-profit corporations, labor unions and other associations.
has abstract
Citizens United v. Federal Ele ...... l in races for federal office.
@en
El caso Ciudadanos Unidos cont ...... ampañas políticas electorales.
@es
L'arrêt Citizens United v. Fed ...... ises aux campagnes politiques.
@fr
シチズンズ・ユナイテッド対FEC裁判(シチズンズユナイテッド ...... 1条の表現の自由に反しており、違憲であるという判断を下した。
@ja
联合公民诉联邦选举委员会案(Citizens United ...... ·乔姆伦斯基将其称为“近年来关于第一修正案最为重要的案件”。
@zh
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
22,097,436
Wikipage revision ID
745,026,486
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
citation
Concurrence
Concurrence/Dissent
DecideDate
DecideYear
Holding
2592000.0
JoinConcurrence
JoinConcurrence/Dissent
Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor
JoinMajority
Roberts, Scalia, Alito; Thomas ; Stevens, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor
Litigants
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
majority
OpinionAnnouncement
OralArgument
OralReargument
Overturned previous case
McConnell v. FEC
Prior
ReargueDate
ReargueYear
SCOTUS
subject
comment
Citizens United v. Federal Ele ...... unions and other associations.
@en
El caso Ciudadanos Unidos cont ...... ampañas políticas electorales.
@es
L'arrêt Citizens United v. Fed ...... ises aux campagnes politiques.
@fr
シチズンズ・ユナイテッド対FEC裁判(シチズンズユナイテッド ...... 1条の表現の自由に反しており、違憲であるという判断を下した。
@ja
联合公民诉联邦选举委员会案(Citizens United ...... ·乔姆伦斯基将其称为“近年来关于第一修正案最为重要的案件”。
@zh
label
Caso Ciudadanos Unidos contra Comisión de Elecciones Federales
@es
Citizens United v. FEC
@en
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
@fr
シチズンズ・ユナイテッド対FEC裁判
@ja
联合公民诉联邦选举委员会案
@zh
sameAs
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
Citizens United, Appellant v. Federal Election Commission
@en