Nordenfelt v Maxim Nordenfelt Guns and Ammunition Co Ltd
Nordenfelt v Maxim Nordenfelt Guns and Ammunition Co Ltd [1894] AC 535 is a 19th-century English case decided by the House of Lords. The dispute was about restraint of trade, and the judgment declares when such a restraint (which is prima facie void) may become valid. The case also established the "Blue pencil doctrine" as a method for deciding whether contractual obligations can be partially enforced when the obligation as drafted in the contract has an element of illegality.
Maxim Nordenfelt Guns and Ammunition Co v NordenfeltNordenfelt v. Maxim, Nordenfelt Gun Co.Nordenfelt v. Maxim, Nordenfelt Guns and Ammunition CoNordenfelt v Maxim, Nordenfelt Gun CoNordenfelt v Maxim, Nordenfelt Gun Co (1894)Nordenfelt v Maxim, Nordenfelt Guns LtdNordenfelt v Maxim, Nordenfelt Guns and Ammunition CoNordenfelt v Maxim, Nordenfelt Guns and Ammunition Co LtdNordenfelt v Maxim Nordenfelt
Wikipage redirect
Nordenfelt v Maxim Nordenfelt Guns and Ammunition Co Ltd
Nordenfelt v Maxim Nordenfelt Guns and Ammunition Co Ltd [1894] AC 535 is a 19th-century English case decided by the House of Lords. The dispute was about restraint of trade, and the judgment declares when such a restraint (which is prima facie void) may become valid. The case also established the "Blue pencil doctrine" as a method for deciding whether contractual obligations can be partially enforced when the obligation as drafted in the contract has an element of illegality.
has abstract
Nordenfelt v Maxim Nordenfelt ...... has an element of illegality.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
10,373,770
Wikipage revision ID
744,620,264
citations
court
House of Lords
name
Nordenfelt v Maxim Nordenfelt Guns and Ammunition Co Ltd
hypernym
comment
Nordenfelt v Maxim Nordenfelt ...... has an element of illegality.
@en
label
Nordenfelt v Maxim Nordenfelt Guns and Ammunition Co Ltd
@en