Ableman v. Booth
Ableman v. Booth, 62 U.S. 506 (1859), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that State courts cannot issue rulings on federal law that contradict the decisions of federal courts, overturning a decision by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin. The Supreme Court held that under the Constitution, the federal courts have the final power to decide cases arising under the Constitution and federal statutes, and that the States do not have the power to overturn those decisions. Thus, Wisconsin did not have the authority to nullify federal judgments or statutes.
Wikipage disambiguates
primaryTopic
Ableman v. Booth
Ableman v. Booth, 62 U.S. 506 (1859), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that State courts cannot issue rulings on federal law that contradict the decisions of federal courts, overturning a decision by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin. The Supreme Court held that under the Constitution, the federal courts have the final power to decide cases arising under the Constitution and federal statutes, and that the States do not have the power to overturn those decisions. Thus, Wisconsin did not have the authority to nullify federal judgments or statutes.
has abstract
Ableman v. Booth, 62 U.S. 506 ...... deral courts from one another.
@en
«Эйблман против Бута» (англ. A ...... инятием Закона о беглых рабах.
@ru
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
17,820,031
Wikipage revision ID
742,517,919
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
DecideDate
DecideYear
Holding
A state court cannot grant a w ...... States and in federal custody.
JoinMajority
Litigants
Ableman v. Booth
United States v. Booth
SCOTUS
subject
comment
Ableman v. Booth, 62 U.S. 506 ...... federal judgments or statutes.
@en
«Эйблман против Бута» (англ. A ...... уции. Указывалось также, что с
@ru
label
Ableman v. Booth
@en
Эйблман против Бута
@ru
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
Stephen V. Ableman, plaintiff ...... f in error v. Sherman M. Booth
@en