Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United States
Addyston Pipe and Steel Co. v. United States, 175 U.S. 211 (1899), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that for a restraint of trade to be lawful, it must be ancillary to the main purpose of a lawful contract. A naked restraint on trade is unlawful; it is not a defense that the restraint is reasonable.
175 U.S. 21185 F. 271Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. U.S.Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. U. S.Addyston Pipe and Steel Co. v. U.S.Addyston Pipe and Steel Co. v. USAddyston Pipe and Steel Co. v. United StatesAddyston Pipe and Steel Company v. United StatesAddyston Pipe and Steel Company v United StatesAddyston Pipe v. United States
Wikipage redirect
primaryTopic
Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United States
Addyston Pipe and Steel Co. v. United States, 175 U.S. 211 (1899), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that for a restraint of trade to be lawful, it must be ancillary to the main purpose of a lawful contract. A naked restraint on trade is unlawful; it is not a defense that the restraint is reasonable.
has abstract
Addyston Pipe and Steel Co. v. ...... t the restraint is reasonable.
@en
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
739,423,541
ArgueDateA
ArgueDateB
ArgueYear
citation
DecideDate
DecideYear
Holding
Upheld the rule of reason doctrine regarding U.S. antitrust laws.
JoinMajority
Fuller, Harlan, Gray, Brewer, Brown, Shiras, White, McKenna
LawsApplied
First, Fourteenth amendment, Commerce Clause
Litigants
Addyston Pipe and Steel Co. v. U.S.
majority
SCOTUS
subject
comment
Addyston Pipe and Steel Co. v. ...... t the restraint is reasonable.
@en
label
Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United States
@en
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
Addyston Pipe and Steel Company et al., Appts., v. United States
@en