Barclays Bank Ltd v Quistclose Investments Ltd
Barclays Bank Ltd v Quistclose Investments Ltd [1968] UKHL 4 (sub nom Quistclose Investments Ltd v Rolls Razor Ltd) is a leading property, unjust enrichment and trusts case, which invented a new species of proprietary interest in English law. A "Quistclose trust" arises when an asset is given to somebody for a specific purpose and if for whatever reason the purpose for the transfer fails, the transferor may take back the asset.
Barclays Bank Ltd v Quistclose Invest LtdBarclays Bank Ltd v Quistclose LtdBarclays Bank v QuistcloseBarclays Bank v Quistclose InvestmentsBarclays Bank v Quistclose Investments LtdBarclays Ltd v Quistclose LtdBarclays bank ltd v quistclose investments ltdBarclays v quistcloseQuistcloseQuistclose trustQuistclose trusts
Wikipage redirect
primaryTopic
Barclays Bank Ltd v Quistclose Investments Ltd
Barclays Bank Ltd v Quistclose Investments Ltd [1968] UKHL 4 (sub nom Quistclose Investments Ltd v Rolls Razor Ltd) is a leading property, unjust enrichment and trusts case, which invented a new species of proprietary interest in English law. A "Quistclose trust" arises when an asset is given to somebody for a specific purpose and if for whatever reason the purpose for the transfer fails, the transferor may take back the asset.
has abstract
Barclays Bank Ltd v Quistclose ...... dvanced holds them as trustee.
@en
thumbnail
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
719,761,475
citations
[1968] UKHL 4, [1970] AC 567
court
House of Lords
date decided
1968-10-31
judges
Lord Reid, Lord Morris of Borth-Y-Gest, Lord Guest, Lord Pearce and Lord Wilberforce
keywords
Quistclose trust, resulting trust
name
Barclays Bank Ltd v Quistclose Investments Ltd
opinions
Lord Wilberforce
subject
hypernym
type
comment
Barclays Bank Ltd v Quistclose ...... feror may take back the asset.
@en
label
Barclays Bank Ltd v Quistclose Investments Ltd
@en
