Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Montana
Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Montana, 453 U.S. 609 (1981) is a 6-to-3 ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States that held that a severance tax in Montana does not violate the Commerce Clause or the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution.
Wikipage redirect
primaryTopic
Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Montana
Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Montana, 453 U.S. 609 (1981) is a 6-to-3 ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States that held that a severance tax in Montana does not violate the Commerce Clause or the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution.
has abstract
Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Mon ...... he United States Constitution.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
24,233,438
Wikipage revision ID
723,022,516
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
citation
Concurrence
DecideDate
DecideYear
Dissent
Holding
The Montana severance tax does not violate the Commerce Clause or the Supremacy Clause.
JoinDissent
Powell, Stevens
JoinMajority
Burger, Brennan, Stewart, White, Rehnquist
LawsApplied
Litigants
Commonwealth Edison Company v. Montana
majority
Prior
SCOTUS
subject
comment
Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Mon ...... he United States Constitution.
@en
label
Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Montana
@en
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
Commonwealth Edison Company, et al. v. Montana, et al.
@en