District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman
District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 (1983), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court in which the Court enunciated a rule of civil procedure known as the Rooker-Feldman doctrine (also named for the earlier case of Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413 (1923). The doctrine holds that lower United States federal courts may not sit in direct review of state court decisions.
Wikipage disambiguates
primaryTopic
District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman
District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 (1983), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court in which the Court enunciated a rule of civil procedure known as the Rooker-Feldman doctrine (also named for the earlier case of Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413 (1923). The doctrine holds that lower United States federal courts may not sit in direct review of state court decisions.
has abstract
District of Columbia Court of ...... view of state court decisions.
@en
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
645,223,038
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
citation
DecideDate
DecideYear
Dissent
Holding
The Court held that lower Unit ...... g the Rooker-Feldman doctrine.
JoinMajority
Burger, White, Marshall, Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist, O'Connor
LawsApplied
Litigants
District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman
majority
Prior
On certiorari from the United ...... e District of Columbia Circuit
SCOTUS
subject
comment
District of Columbia Court of ...... view of state court decisions.
@en
label
District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman
@en
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
District of Columbia Court of Appeals, et al. v. Feldman, et al.
@en