Dred Scott v. Sandford
Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 (1857), also known simply as the Dred Scott case, was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court on US labor law and constitutional law. It held that "a negro, whose ancestors were imported into [the U.S.], and sold as slaves", whether enslaved or free, could not be an American citizen and therefore had no standing to sue in federal court, and that the federal government had no power to regulate slavery in the federal territories acquired after the creation of the United States. Dred Scott, an enslaved man of "the negro African race" who had been taken by his owners to free states and territories, attempted to sue for his freedom. In a 7–2 decision written by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, the court denied Scott's request. The decision was only
Wikipage disambiguates
60 U.S. 393Dred Scot V. SanfordDred Scott CaseDred Scott DecisionDred Scott V. SandfordDred Scott V SandfordDred Scott caseDred Scott decisionDred Scott descisionDred Scott v. John F.A. SandfordDred Scott v. John F. A. SandfordDred Scott v. SanfordDred Scott v SandfordDred Scott vs. SandfordDred scott v. sandfordDred scott v. sanfordDred scott v sanfordDred scott vs. sandfordDred scott vs SandfordDredd Scott v. SandfordIrene EmersonScott v. SandfordScott v. SanfordScott v SanfordThe Dred Scott CaseThe Dred Scott Decision
Wikipage redirect
primaryTopic
Dred Scott v. Sandford
Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 (1857), also known simply as the Dred Scott case, was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court on US labor law and constitutional law. It held that "a negro, whose ancestors were imported into [the U.S.], and sold as slaves", whether enslaved or free, could not be an American citizen and therefore had no standing to sue in federal court, and that the federal government had no power to regulate slavery in the federal territories acquired after the creation of the United States. Dred Scott, an enslaved man of "the negro African race" who had been taken by his owners to free states and territories, attempted to sue for his freedom. In a 7–2 decision written by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, the court denied Scott's request. The decision was only
has abstract
De zaak Dred Scott vs. Sandfor ...... van Scotts eigenaar beslecht.
@nl
Dred Scott v. John F. A. Sandf ...... États-Unis Roger Brooke Taney.
@fr
Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US ...... court's worst decision ever".
@en
Dred Scott versus Sandford war ...... r Vereinigten Staaten gesehen.
@de
El Caso Dred Scott contra Sand ...... ón de la próxima Guerra Civil.
@es
Il caso Dred Scott contro Sand ...... caso Slaughter-House del 1873.
@it
O Caso Dred Scott (também conh ...... tão candidato Abraham Lincoln.
@pt
Дредд Скотт против Сэнфорда — ...... ло подготовлено Роджером Тони.
@ru
ドレッド・スコット対サンフォード事件(英:Dred Scot ...... リカ合衆国憲法修正第13条と第14条で覆されることになった。
@ja
斯科特诉桑福德案(Dred Scott v. Sandfor ...... Sanford”。这仅是一个文员的拼写错误,但法院没有纠正。
@zh
thumbnail
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
744,068,185
ArgueDateA
ArgueDateB
ArgueYear
case
Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393
citation
Concurrence
DecideDate
DecideYear
Dissent
findlaw
Holding
Judgment reversed and suit dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
JoinConcurrence
JoinMajority
Wayne, Catron, Daniel, Nelson, Grier, Campbell
justia
Litigants
Dred Scott v. Sandford
other source
other url
Prior
Judgment for defendant, C.C.D. Mo.
ReargueDateA
ReargueDateB
ReargueYear
SCOTUS
superseded
subject
comment
De zaak Dred Scott vs. Sandfor ...... van Scotts eigenaar beslecht.
@nl
Dred Scott v. John F. A. Sandf ...... ur de l'esclavage, déclarant :
@fr
Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US ...... equest. The decision was only
@en
Dred Scott versus Sandford war ...... r Vereinigten Staaten gesehen.
@de
El Caso Dred Scott contra Sand ...... ón de la próxima Guerra Civil.
@es
Il caso Dred Scott contro Sand ...... gli schiavi proprietà privata.
@it
O Caso Dred Scott (também conh ...... os bens móveis ou propriedade
@pt
Дредд Скотт против Сэнфорда — ...... ло подготовлено Роджером Тони.
@ru
ドレッド・スコット対サンフォード事件(英:Dred Scot ...... リカ合衆国憲法修正第13条と第14条で覆されることになった。
@ja
斯科特诉桑福德案(Dred Scott v. Sandfor ...... Sanford”。这仅是一个文员的拼写错误,但法院没有纠正。
@zh
label
Caso Dred Scott contra Sandford
@es
Caso Dred Scott
@pt
Dred Scott contro Sandford
@it
Dred Scott v. Sandford
@de
Dred Scott v. Sandford
@en
Dred Scott vs. Sandford
@nl
Scott v. Sandford
@fr
Дред Скотт против Сэндфорда
@ru
ドレッド・スコット対サンフォード事件
@ja
斯科特诉桑福德案
@zh
sameAs
wasDerivedFrom
depiction
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
Dred Scott v. John F. A. Sandford
@en