Frisby v. Schultz
Frisby v. Schultz, 487 U.S. 474 (1988), was a United States Supreme Court case that upheld the ordinance by the town of Brookfield, Wisconsin, preventing protest outside of a residential home. In a 6–3 decision, the Court ruled that the First Amendment right to freedom of assembly and protest was not violated, stating that the government had "[legitimate reason to protect] the homes of its residents[.]"
Wikipage redirect
primaryTopic
Frisby v. Schultz
Frisby v. Schultz, 487 U.S. 474 (1988), was a United States Supreme Court case that upheld the ordinance by the town of Brookfield, Wisconsin, preventing protest outside of a residential home. In a 6–3 decision, the Court ruled that the First Amendment right to freedom of assembly and protest was not violated, stating that the government had "[legitimate reason to protect] the homes of its residents[.]"
has abstract
Frisby v. Schultz, 487 U.S. 47 ...... the homes of its residents[.]"
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
33,442,929
Wikipage revision ID
724,038,951
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
Concurrence
DecideDate
DecideYear
Dissent
Holding
The Supreme Court upheld the s ...... nificant government interest."
JoinDissent
JoinMajority
Rehnquist, Blackmun, Scalia, Kennedy
Litigants
Frisby v. Schultz
majority
OralArgument
SCOTUS
subject
comment
Frisby v. Schultz, 487 U.S. 47 ...... the homes of its residents[.]"
@en
label
Frisby v. Schultz
@en
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
Russell Frisby et al. V. Sandra Schultz et al.
@en