Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc.
Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc., 552 U.S. 576 (2008), was a United States Supreme Court case which held that state and federal courts cannot, on a motion to vacate or modify an arbitration award, expand the limited scope of judicial review specified in 9 U.S.C. §§ 10 and 11, including terms agreed upon by the parties.
primaryTopic
Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc.
Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc., 552 U.S. 576 (2008), was a United States Supreme Court case which held that state and federal courts cannot, on a motion to vacate or modify an arbitration award, expand the limited scope of judicial review specified in 9 U.S.C. §§ 10 and 11, including terms agreed upon by the parties.
has abstract
Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. ...... ms agreed upon by the parties.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
23,437,514
Wikipage revision ID
724,030,072
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
DecideDate
DecideYear
Dissent
Holding
State and federal courts canno ...... r the Federal Arbitration Act.
JoinDissent
JoinMajority
Roberts, Thomas, Ginsburg, Alito; Scalia
LawsApplied
Litigants
Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc.
majority
ParallelCitations
Prior
On writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
SCOTUS
subject
comment
Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. ...... ms agreed upon by the parties.
@en
label
Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc.
@en
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
Hall Street Associates, L.L.C., Petitioner v. Mattel, Inc.
@en